UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrantx

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

 

oPreliminary Proxy Statement
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

 

PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

xNo fee required
oFee Computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

 

 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 
 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 
 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 
 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 
 (5)Total fee paid:

 

 
 oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 
 (1)Amount Previously Paid:

 

 
 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 
 (3)Filing Party:

 

 
 (4)Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

500 HILLS DRIVE

BEDMINSTER, NEW JERSEY 07921

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2018

To Our Shareholders:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (the “Company”) will be held on the first floor of our headquarters building at 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New Jersey on Tuesday, April 26, 2016,Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m. local time, for the purpose of consideringto consider and voting upon the following matters:

vote:

1.Election of the elevenTo elect thirteen directors named herein to serve until the expiration of their termsfor a one-year term and thereafter until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.

 

2.To approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the Corporation’sCompany’s named executive officers as determined by the Compensation Committee.officers.

 

3.The approvalTo amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the amended Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, which includes an increase in the share reserve by 500,000authorized number of shares and certain other amendments described herein.of common stock from 21,000,000 to 42,000,000.

 

4.The ratification ofTo ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Corporation’sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.2018.

 

5.Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 7, 2016,15, 2018 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

 

You are urged to read carefully the attached proxy statement relating to the meeting.

 

Shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, we urge you to exercise your right to vote as promptly as possible.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors
Todd M. Poland
Corporate Secretary

By Order of the Board of Directors

MARY M. RUSSELL,

CORPORATE SECRETARY

 

Bedminster, New Jersey

March 17, 201627, 2018

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED

OR VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 26, 2016MAY 9, 2018

 

This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at

http://www.edocumentview.com/PGC

 

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

Proxy Statement

Table of Contents

Voting Information1
Corporate Governance3
Director Compensation9
Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock10
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors12
Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Compensation of Named Executive Officers14
Proposal 3 – Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Authorized Shares15
Proposal 4 – Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm16
Compensation Discussion and Analysis19
Compensation Committee Report31
Executive Compensation32
Transactions with Related Persons39
Shareholder Proposals39
Other Matters39

Table of Contents

PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

500 HILLS DRIVE

BEDMINSTER, NEW JERSEY 07921

PROXY STATEMENT

DATED MARCH 17, 2016

GENERAL PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION

This proxy statement is furnished to the shareholders of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (“Peapack-Gladstone” or the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Peapack-Gladstone of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on the first floor of our headquarters building at 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New Jersey on Tuesday, April 26, 2016Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m. local time. This proxy statement is first being made available to shareholders on approximately March 17, 2016.27, 2018.

 

VOTING INFORMATION

 

Outstanding Securities and Voting Rights

 

The record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting is March 7, 2016.15, 2018. Only shareholders of record as of the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

 

On the record date 16,347,75019,013,821 shares of Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s common stock, no par value, were outstanding and eligible to be voted at the meeting. Each share of Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s common stock is entitled to one vote.

 

Delivery of Proxy Materials

The 2018 notice of annual meeting of shareholders, this proxy statement, the Company’s 2017 annual report on Form 10-K and the proxy card or voting instruction form are referred to as our “proxy materials.” Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are furnishing our proxy materials to certain shareholders over the Internet. Most shareholders are receiving by mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (an “E-Proxy Notice”), which provides general information about the annual meeting, the matters to be voted on at the annual meeting, the website where our proxy statement and annual report are available for review, downloading and printing, and instructions on how to submit proxy votes. The E-Proxy Notice also provides instructions on how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials and how to elect to receive either a paper copy or an electronic copy of the proxy materials for future meetings.

Shareholders that have previously elected to receive proxy materials via electronic delivery will receive an e-mail with the proxy statement, annual report and instructions on how to vote. Shareholders who previously elected to receive paper copies of the proxy materials will receive the proxy statement, annual report and instructions on how to vote by mail.

Householding

When more than one holder of our common stock shares the same address, we may deliver only one E-Proxy Notice or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to that address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of those shareholders. Similarly, brokers and other intermediaries holding shares of our common stock in “street name” for more than one beneficial owner with the same address may deliver only one E-Proxy Notice or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to that address if they have received consent from the beneficial owners of the stock.

We will deliver promptly upon written demand or oral request a separate copy of the E-Proxy Notice or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to any shareholder or record at a shared address to which a single copy of those documents was delivered. To receive additional copies, you may write to or call Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary of Peapack-Gladstone, at 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, P.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 or (908) 443-5386. If your shares are held in “street name,” you should contact the broker or other intermediary who holds the shares on your behalf to request an additional copy of the E-Proxy Notice or proxy materials.

If you are a shareholder of record and are either receiving multiple E-Proxy Notices or multiple paper copies of the proxy materials, as applicable, and wish to request future delivery of a single copy or are receiving a single E-Proxy Notice or copy of the proxy materials, as applicable, and wish to request future delivery of multiple copies, please contact Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary at the address or telephone number above. If your shares are held in “street name,” you should contact the broker or other intermediary who holds the shares on your behalf.

 1

Table of Contents

Required Vote

 

At the meeting, inspectors of election will tabulate both ballots cast by shareholders present and votingThe presence, in person and votes castor by proxy. Under applicable New Jersey law and Peapack-Gladstone's certificateproxy, of incorporation and by-laws, abstentionsa majority of the shares entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of establishingto determine a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker holding shares for a beneficial holder does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary power to vote with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

 

The election of directors requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s common stock voted at the meeting, whether voted in person or by proxy. This means that the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact on the election of directors.

 

The approval of each of (1) the amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, (2) on a non-binding basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as determined byand (3) the Compensation Committee requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, whether voted in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact on the approval of this advisory proposal.

The ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, whether voted in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact on the ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP’s appointment.

The approval of the amended Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, whether voted in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect in the approval of the amended 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.these proposals.

 

All shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation will be voted FOR the election of the 11 nominees for director who are named in this proxy statement, FOR the approval, on a non-binding basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as determined by the Compensation Committee, FOR the approval of the amended Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and FOR ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016,follows, unless the shareholder specifies a different choice by means of the proxy or revokes the proxy prior to the time it is exercised. exercised:

·Proposal 1 – FOR the election of the 13 nominees for director;
·Proposal 2 – FOR the approval, on a non-binding basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;
·Proposal 3 – FOR approval of the amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 21,000,000 to 42,000,000; and
·Proposal 4 – FOR the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.

Should any other matter properly come before the meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote upon such matters accordingin their discretion.

Voting

We are offering you four alternative ways to their discretion.vote your shares:

Internet. If you wish to vote using the Internet, you can access the webpage at www.envisionreports.com/PGC and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code on your E-Proxy Notice or proxy card with your smartphone. Have your proxy card available when you access the webpage.

Telephone. If you wish to vote by telephone, call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE(8683) and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call.

Mail. If you wish to vote by mail, please sign your name exactly as it appears on your proxy card, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

In Person. The method by which you vote will not limit your right to vote in person at the meeting if you decide to attend in person. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from the holder of record to be able to vote at the meeting. If you submit a proxy and then wish to change or vote in person at the meeting, you will need to revoke the proxy that you have submitted, as described below.

 

Revocability of Proxy

 

Any shareholder giving a proxy has the right to attend and to vote at the meeting in person. A proxy may be revoked prior to the meeting by filingsubmitting a later-dated proxy or a written revocation if it is sent to theTodd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary, of Peapack-Gladstone, Mary M.

2

Russell, at 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, POP.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey, 07921, and is received by Peapack-Gladstone in advance of the meeting.07921. A proxy may be revoked at the meeting by filing a later-dated proxy or a written revocation with the Secretary of the meeting prior to the voting of such proxy or by voting in person at the meeting.

 

 2

Table of Contents

Solicitation of Proxies

 

This proxy solicitation is being made by the Board of Peapack-Gladstone and the costs of the solicitation will be borne by Peapack-Gladstone. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, e-mail or facsimile transmission by directors, officers and employees of Peapack-Gladstone and its subsidiaries or Laurel Hill Advisory Group LLC.LLC, a proxy solicitor firm. Directors, officers and employees will not be specially compensated for such solicitation activities. The amount Peapack-Gladstone will pay $6,000 plus certain out of pocket costs to Laurel Hill Advisory Group LLC for its proxy solicitation services is $6,000 plus certain out of pocket costs.services. Peapack-Gladstone will also make arrangements with brokers, dealers, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons, and Peapack-Gladstone will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding the materials.

 

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORSAnnual Meeting Attendance

 

DIRECTOR INFORMATIONOnly shareholders or their proxy holders and Peapack-Gladstone guests may attend the annual meeting. Please bring your E-Proxy Notice to be admitted to the meeting.

 

Peapack-Gladstone's by-laws authorize a minimumIf your shares are held in “street name,” you must bring to the meeting evidence of fiveyour stock ownership indicating that you beneficially owned the shares on the record date for voting and a maximumvalid form of 25 directors; currently,photo identification to be allowed access. If you wish to vote at the Board has 11 members. Directors are elected annually bymeeting, you much bring a proxy executed in your favor from the shareholders for one-year terms. Peapack-Gladstone's Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board the 11 current directors for reelection for one-year terms expiring at Peapack-Gladstone’s 2017 Annual Meetingholder of Shareholders or until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. If, for any reason, any of the nominees become unavailable for election, the proxy solicited by the Board will be voted for a substitute nominee selected by the Board. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the named nominees is unavailable for election or will not serve if elected.record.

 

Unless a shareholder indicates otherwise on the proxy, the proxy will be voted for the persons named in the table below to serve until the expiration of their terms, and thereafter until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the Board's nominees for election, the nominees' positions with Peapack-Gladstone (if any), the principal occupation or employment of each nominee for the past five years and the period during which each nominee has served as a director of Peapack-Gladstone. The nominee's prior service as a director includes prior service as a director of Peapack-Gladstone Bank (the “Bank”) prior to the formation of the holding company. In addition, described below is each director nominee’s particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that have led the Board to conclude that the person should serve as a director.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS
Name and Position   Director Principal Occupation or Employment for the Past Five Years;
With Peapack-Gladstone Age Since Other Company Directorships

Finn M. W. Caspersen, Jr.

Senior Executive Vice
President, Chief Operating
Officer and General
Counsel

 46 2012 Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel of Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank. Mr. Caspersen began his career with Peapack-Gladstone in 2004 and is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his business skills, his judgment, and his proven leadership.
Dr. Susan A. Cole 73 2014 President of Montclair State University.  Dr. Cole, named to the Board in February 2014, is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of her 18 years as President of Montclair State University, the second largest university in New Jersey, with approximately 20,000 students, which is invaluable in the oversight of Bank operations.
Anthony J. Consi, II 70 2000 Retired; previously Senior Vice President of Finance and Operations, Weichert Realtors. Mr. Consi is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 15 years of public accounting experience at Coopers & Lybrand and his 22 years of finance and operations leadership at Weichert Realtors, both of which are invaluable to his role as Audit Committee Chairman.
Richard Daingerfield 62 2014 Retired; previously Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts from 2010 to 2014.  Mr.

      Daingerfield is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his expertise in corporate governance, executive management, risk management, corporate banking and commercial banking. His broad legal experience in all aspects of commercial and retail banking, including international and domestic private banking, are invaluable to his role as Risk Committee Chairman.
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr. 55 2012 Partner of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Mr. Gramigna is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his27 years of experience in trust, estate planning and estate administration, which is invaluable in the oversight of our wealth management division.

Douglas L. Kennedy

CEO

 59 2012 President & CEO of Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank since 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kennedy served as Executive Vice President and Market President at Capital One Bank/North Fork and held key executive level positions with Summit Bank and Bank of American/Fleet Bank. Mr. Kennedy, who began his career in commercial banking in 1978, is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 38 years of commercial banking experience, demonstrated business leadership, judgment and vision.
John D. Kissel 63 1987 Real Estate Broker, Turpin Real Estate, Inc. Mr. Kissel is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 26 years of experience in the residential real estate market, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of the Company’s real estate loan portfolio.
James R. Lamb 73 1993 Principal of James R. Lamb, P.C., Attorney at Law. Mr. Lamb is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 49 years of legal experience, which is invaluable to the Board’s corporate governance program and the Board’s oversight of the Bank’s legal and regulatory affairs.
F. Duffield Meyercord
Chairman
 69 1991 Chairman of the Board of Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank; Partner of Carl Marks Advisory Group, LLC; President, Meyercord Advisors, Inc.; Director of Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (formerly Programmer’s Paradise, Inc.). Mr. Meyercord is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 41 years of experience in directing strategic projects and providing operational advisory services to numerous businesses, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of corporate strategy.
Philip W. Smith, III 60 1995 President, Phillary Management, Inc., a real estate management company. Mr. Smith is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 29 years of experience in commercial real estate agency and management, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of the Company’s real estate loan portfolio.
Beth Welsh 57 2012 General Manager of Bassett Associates. Ms. Welsh is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of her21 years of experience in the commercial real estate market as well as her past banking experience, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of the Company’s real estate lending and small business banking.

Other than Mr. Meyercord, none of our directors hold, or have held in the past five years, any directorships at a public company or registered investment company.

The members of our Board of Directors are persons who as a group we believe have demonstrated appropriate leadership skills, experience and judgment in areas that are relevant to our business. We believe that their collective ability to challenge and stimulate management and their dedication to the affairs of the Company serve the interests of the Company and its shareholders. In accordance with its charter, the Nominating Committee has established director qualifications and standards, and identifies and evaluates each candidate on a case-by-case basis including an assessment of the requisite skills and characteristics of new board members as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment includes consideration of the independence, diversity, skills, experience and other elements relevant to the success of our Company in today’s business environment. In selecting director nominees for our Board, we consider the collective experience, attributes and skills of the entire Board, as well as the ability of the individuals to work together with other members of the Board.


RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSAL 1

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE ‘FOR’ THE NOMINATED SLATE OF DIRECTORS INCLUDED IN PROPOSAL 1.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

General and Corporate Governance Principles

 

The business and affairs of Peapack-Gladstone are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. Members of the Board are kept informed of Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s business through discussions with our President and CEO and Peapack-Gladstone’s other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees. All members of the Board also served as directors of Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s subsidiary bank, Peapack-Gladstone Bank (the “Bank”), during 2015.2017. The Board of Directors of Peapack-Gladstone and Peapack-Gladstone Bank each held 713 meetings during 2015.2017. During 2015,2017, each director of Peapack-Gladstone attended no fewer than 91%75% of the total number of meetings of Peapack-Gladstone’s Board and meetings of committees on which such director served. It is Peapack-Gladstone’s policy to encourage director attendance at the Annual Meeting absent a compelling reason such as illness. Last year, all but two directors attended the Annual Meeting.

 

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles, which are intended to provide guidelines for the governance of Peapack-Gladstone, including: the qualification and selection of the Board of Directors and seniorits committees; convening executive sessions of independent directors; the Board of Directors’ interaction with management believe promote this purpose.and third parties; director compensation, orientation and continuing education and the evaluation of the performance of the CEO. The Corporate Governance Principles are available in the Government Documents portion of the Investor Relations section of Peapack-Gladstone’s website located at www.pgbank.com. We periodically review these governance principles, the rules and listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)SEC regulations.

 

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

 

Our Board of Directors is comprised of 1113 directors, a majorityall of whichwhom are independent directors. F. Duffield Meyercord serves as our Chairman and Douglas L. Kennedy is our Chief Executive Office and is also a member of our Board of Directors. The board has three primary committees composed solely of independent directors – Audit, Compensation, and Nominating – under applicable NASDAQ rules, and each of the three committees has a separate independent chair. In addition to these three committees, theexcept for Douglas L. Kennedy, our Chief Executive Officer. The Company also hasmaintains a Risk Committee, which, along with our Board of Directors, is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management. Our full Board receives and reviews a company-wide risk assessment annually. While the Board Risk Committee and the full Board oversee the Company’s risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is an appropriate approach for addressing the risks facing our Company at this time.Company. Our independent directors conduct separate executive sessions to discuss Company affairs on at least a semi-annual basis.basis and more frequently as necessary. The ChairmanChair of the Board, who is independent, presides over these sessions. In the event thatIf in the future our Board ChairmanChair is not independent, our By-Lawsbylaws provide for the appointment of an independent lead director.

 

We believe that having a separate chairmanChair and CEO, independent chairs and membership for each of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees and holding executive sessions of independent director sessionsdirectors provides the right form of leadership for our Company. Separating the chairmanChair and CEO positions allowedallows us the CEO to expand our management structure to positionbetter focus on his responsibilities of running the Company, enhancing shareholder growth and better positioning the Company for future

 3

Table of Contents

growth, while our experienced independent director majority provides oversight of Company operations and provides different perspectives based on the directors’ experience, oversight and expertise from outside our Company.

 

Director Independence

 

The Board has determined that a majority of the directors and all current members of the Nominating, Compensation, and Audit Committees are “independent” for purposes of thein accordance with NASDAQ rules and Peapack-Gladstone’s internal independence standards provided in our Corporate Governance Principles. The Board has determined that the members of the Audit Committee are also “independent” for purposes of the heightened standards of independence under NASDAQ rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the members of the Compensation Committee are also “independent” for purposes of the heightened standard of independence under the NASDAQ rules. The Board based these determinations onBoard’s conclusion follows a review by the Nominating Committee and on a review by management of the responses of the directors and executive officers to questions regarding employment and transaction history, transactions with the Bank, affiliations and family and other relationships. The independent directors are Dr. Susan A. Cole, Anthony J. Consi, II, Richard Daingerfield, Edward A. Gramigna, Jr., James R. Lamb, F. Duffield Meyercord, Philip W. Smith, III and Beth Welsh.

 

To assist it in making determinations of independence, the Board has concluded that the following relationships are immaterial and that a director whose only relationships with Peapack-Gladstone fall within these categories is independent absent any other relationship whichthat would interfere with the exercise of the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director:

 

5

·A loan made by the Bank to a director, his or her immediate family member or an entity affiliated with a director or his or her immediate family member, or a loan personally guaranteed by such persons, if such loan (i)(1) complies with state and federal regulations on insider loans, where applicable; and (ii)(2) is not classified by the Bank’s credit committee or by any bank regulatory agency which supervisedthat supervises the Bank as substandard, doubtful or loss.loss; and (3) is on terms customary and usual market terms and conditions.
·A deposit, trust, insurance brokerage, securities brokerage or similar customer relationship between Peapack-Gladstone or its subsidiaries and a director, his or her immediate family member or an affiliate of his or her immediate family member if such relationship is on customary and usual market terms and conditions.
·The employment by Peapack-Gladstone or its subsidiaries of any immediate family member of the director if the employee serves below the level of a senior vice president.
·Annual contributions by Peapack-Gladstone or its subsidiaries to any charity or non-profit corporation with which a director is affiliated if the contributions do not exceed an aggregate of $20,000 in any calendar year and the contribution is made in the name of Peapack-Gladstone.
·Purchases of goods or services by Peapack-Gladstone or any of its subsidiaries from a business in which a director or his or her immediate family member is a partner, shareholder or officer, if the director or his or her immediate family member owns five percent or less of the equity interests of that business and does not serve as an executive officer of the business.
·Purchases of goods or services by Peapack-Gladstone, or any of its subsidiaries, from a director or a business in which the director or his or her immediate family member is a partner, shareholder or officer if the annual aggregate purchases of goods or services from the director, his or her immediate family member or such business in the last calendar year does not exceed the greater of $60,000 or two percent of the gross revenues of the business.
·Fixed retirement benefits paid or payable to a director either currently or on retirement.

 

The following categories or types of transactions, relationships or arrangements were considered by the Board in determining that each listed director is independent in accordance with the NASDAQ listing standardsrules and Peapack-Gladstone’s Corporate Governance Principles.

 

Independent DirectorCategory or Type
Dr. ColeSusan A.ColeTrust
Mr.Anthony J. Consi, IILoans, Deposits Trust
Mr.Richard DaingerfieldLoans, Deposits, Trust
Mr.Edward A. GramignaDeposits, Trust
Mr.John D. KisselLoans, Deposits
James R. Lamb, Esq.Loans, Deposits, Trust
Mr.F. Duffield MeyercordLoans, Deposits, Trust

 4

Table of Contents

Mr.Independent DirectorCategory or Type
Philip W. SmithLoans, Deposits, Trust, Employment of Immediate Family Member below
level of Senior Vice PresidentMember*
Ms.Beth WelshLoans, Deposits, Trust

___________________

IndependentMr. Smith’s sister in-law Anne Smith was promoted to Senior Managing Director Sessions

Our Corporate Governance Principles require thatin 2017. Anne Smith is not an executive sessions including only independent directors be held at least semi-annually. The Chairmanofficer of the Board, who is independent, presides over these independent director sessions.

Company.

 

Shareholder Communication with Directors

 

The Board of Directors has established the following procedures for shareholder communications with the Board of Directors:

 

·Shareholders wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors should send any communication to the Board of Directors, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, c/o Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary of Peapack-Gladstone, Mary M. Russell, at 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, POP.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey, 07921. Any such communication should state the number of shares owned by the shareholder.
·The Corporate Secretary will forward such communication to the Board of Directors or as appropriate to the particular Committee Chairman,Chair, unless the communication is a personal or similar grievance, an abusive or inappropriate communication, or a communication not related to the duties or responsibilities of the Board of Directors, in which case

6

the Corporate Secretary has the authority to disregard the communication. All such communications will be kept confidential to the extent possible.
·The Corporate Secretary will maintain a log of, and copies of, all communications, for inspection and review by any Board member, and shallwill regularly review all such communications with the Board or the appropriate Committee Chairman.Chair.

 

The Board of Directors has also established the following procedures for shareholder communications with the Chairman,Chair, who presides over the independent director sessions:

 

·Shareholders wishing to communicate with the ChairmanChair should send any communication to the Presiding Director of Independent Director Sessions, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, c/o Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary, of Peapack-Gladstone, Mary M. Russell, at 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, P.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey, 07921. Any such communication should state the number of shares owned by the shareholder.
·The Corporate Secretary will forward such communication to the Chairman,Chair, unless the communication is a personal or similar grievance, an abusive or inappropriate communication, or a communication not related to the duties or responsibilities of the non-management directors, in which case the Corporate Secretary has the authority to disregard the communication. All such communications will be kept confidential to the extent possible.
·The Corporate Secretary will maintain a log of, and copies of, all communications, for inspection and review by the Chairman,Chair, and shallwill regularly review all such communications with the ChairmanChair at the next meeting.

 5

Table of Contents

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

In 2015,2017, the Board of Directors maintained an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating Committee, a Risk Committee, and a CEO Advisoryan Executive Committee. The following table identifies the Company’s Audit, Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee are each solely comprisedCommittees and their members as of independent directors;March 15, 2018. Each committee operates under a descriptionwritten charter that is approved by the Board of eachDirectors that governs its composition, responsibilities and operations. Each committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of theseits charter at least annually. The charters of all three committees follows.are available in the Governance Documents portion of the Investor Relations section of the Company’s web site (www.pgbank.com).

Director 

Audit

Committee

 Compensation
Committee
 

Nominating

Committee

       
Carmen M. Bowser     X
Susan A. Cole     X
Anthony J. Consi, II    X* X  
Richard Daingerfield X    
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr. X      X*
Steven A. Kass X    
Douglas L. Kennedy      
John D. Kissel      
James R. Lamb, Esq. X    
F. Duffield Meyercord      X* X
Philip W. Smith, III     X
Tony Spinelli   X  
Beth Welsh X    
       
Number of meetings in 2017 8 6 2

_____________

*Chairperson

 

Audit Committee

Mr. Consi serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. Other members of the Audit Committee currently are Messrs. Daingerfield, Gramigna and Lamb and Ms. Welsh. The Audit Committee met eight times during 2015.

 

The Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee, Mr. Consi, meets the NASDAQ standard of being financially sophisticated. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Consi meets the SEC criteria of an “audit committee financial expert.”

 

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter. The charter can be viewed at the Investor Relations link on our website www.pgbank.com. The charter givesprovides the Audit Committee the authority and responsibility for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of our independent auditors, including pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors. Other responsibilities of the Audit Committee pursuant to the charter include: reviewing the scope and results of the audit with our independent auditors; reviewing with management and our independent auditors Peapack-Gladstone’s interim and year-end operating results including pressearnings releases; considering the appropriateness of the internal accounting and auditing procedures of Peapack-Gladstone; considering our outside auditors’ independence; reviewing examination reports by bank regulatory agencies; reviewing audit reports prepared by the Internal Audit Department of Peapack-Gladstone; reviewing audit reports prepared by any outside firm whichthat may conduct some internal audit functions for Peapack-Gladstone; and reviewing the response of management to those reports. The Audit Committee reports to the full Board pertinent matters coming before it.

 

Compensation Committee

 

Peapack-Gladstone’s Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Meyercord (Chair), Consi and Smith. Mr. Merton served as a member of the Compensation Committee during 2015 until he retired from the Board on December 31, 2015. During 2015, the Compensation Committee met four times.

The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter setting out the functions and responsibilities of this committee. The charter can be viewed at the Investor Relations link on our website www.pgbank.com. The Compensation Committee recommends to the independent members of the Board the CEO’s compensation, sets specific compensation for executive officers (other than the CEO) and ratifies general compensation levels for all other officers and employees. It also administers our long-term stock incentive plans and makes awards under those plans. The Compensation Committee also recommends Board has approved its charter, which delegates tocompensation. In setting compensation levels, the Compensation Committee the

7

responsibility to recommend Board compensation. Included in this process isundertakes a thorough analysis and consideration of overall Company performance, individual job performance, the overall need of the Company to attract, retain and incent executive talent, and the total cost of the compensation programs.programs, and peer compensation comparisons.

 

 6

Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee has the authority to hire, fire, and seekresponsibility for the servicesappointment, retention, compensation and oversight of compensation consulting and advisory firms as it deems appropriate to its role. In 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of McLagan, an Aon Hewitt Company (“McLagan”), an independent compensation consulting firm specializing in executive compensation. Services were related to providingcompensation, which provided an updated competitive market analysis. McLagan reports directly to the Compensation Committee and carries out its responsibilities to the Compensation Committee in coordination with the Human Resources Department as requested by the Compensation Committee. As a matter of policy the Compensation Committee does not prohibit its advisors from providing services to management, but any such engagement must be requested or approved by the Compensation Committee.

 

Nominating Committee

 

Peapack-Gladstone’s Nominating Committee currently consists of Messrs. Gramigna (Chair), Smith, Meyercord and Ms. Cole. Mr. Merton served as a member of the Nominating Committee during 2015 until he retired from the Board on December 31, 2015. The Nominating Committee met two times during 2015.

The Nominating Committee operates under a written charter setting out the functions and responsibilities of this committee. The charter can be viewed at the Investor Relations link on our website www.pgbank.com. The Nominating Committee reviews qualifications of and recommends to the Board candidates for election as director of Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank, considers the composition of the Board, recommends committee assignments, and discusses management succession for the ChairmanChair and the CEO positions. The Nominating Committee is also charged with reviewing the Board’s adherence to the Corporate Governance Principles and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Nominating Committee reviews recommendations from shareholders regarding corporate governance and director candidates. The procedure for submitting recommendations of director candidates is set forth below under the caption “Nomination of Directors.”

 

Nomination of Directors

 

Nominations for director may be made only by the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board or by a shareholder of record entitled to vote. The Board of Directors has established minimum criteria for members of the Board.

TheseBoard, which include:

 

·Directors are encouraged to live and/or work in the communities served by Peapack-Gladstone’s subsidiary bank.
·Directors shall maintain stockStock ownership in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines.
·Directors shall be experienced in business, shall be financially literate and shall beBeing respected members of their communities.
·Directors shall becommunities and of high ethical and moral standards and havehaving sound personal finances.
·A Director may not serveNot serving on the board of directors of any other bank that serves the same market area as Peapack-Gladstone.
·An appropriate mix of educational background, professional background and business experience to make a significant contribution to the overall composition of the Board.
·If the Committee deems it applicable, whether the candidate would be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and considered to be financially sophisticated as described in the NASDAQ rules, or considered to be an audit committee financial expert as defined pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
·Whether the candidate would be considered independent under the NASDAQ rules and the Board’s additional independence guidelines set forth in Peapack-Gladstone’s Corporate Governance Principles.
·Demonstrated character and reputation, both personal and professional, consistent with that required for a bank director.
·Willingness to apply sound and independent business judgment.
·Ability to work productively with the other members of the Board.
·Availability for the substantial duties and responsibilities of a Peapack-Gladstone director.
·Meets the additional criteria set forth in the Peapack-Gladstone’s Corporate Governance Principles.

 

The Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy with regard to the selection of director nominees. The Nominating Committee considers diversity of experience, both of the individual under consideration and of the Board as a whole, as a factor in identifying nominees for director. In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, in assessing candidates for nomination, the Nominating Committee considers, among other factors, the candidate’s independence, diversity, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board.

 

The Nominating Committee has adopted a policy regarding consideration of director candidates recommended by shareholders. The Nominating Committee will consider nominations made by shareholders. Shareholders wishing to submit a director candidate for consideration by the Committee must submit such director candidate recommendations to the Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, NJ 07921, in writing, not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting. In order toFor our annual meeting in 2019, we must receive this notice between December 10, 2018 and January 9, 2019. To ensure that a shareholder wishing to propose a candidate for consideration by the Committee has a significant stake in the Company, to qualify for consideration by the Committee, the shareholder submitting the candidate must demonstrate that he or she has been the beneficial owner of at least 1% of the Company’s outstanding shares for a minimum of one year prior to the submission of the request. In addition, the Committee has the right to require any additional

8

background or other information from any director candidate or the recommending shareholder as it may deem appropriate. Shareholders who wish

 7

Table of Contents

to nominate a director must follow the requirements in our bylaws. For our annual meeting in the year 2017, we must receive this notice on or after November 27, 2016, and on or before December 27, 2016.

The following factors, at a minimum, are considered by the Nominating Committee as partinformation regarding shareholder nominations of its review of all director candidates, and in recommending potential director candidates to the Board:see “Shareholder Proposals” below.

·appropriate mix of educational background, professional background and business experience to make a significant contribution to the overall composition of the Board;
·if the Committee deems it applicable, whether the candidate would be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and considered to be financially sophisticated as described in the NASDAQ rules, or considered to be an audit committee financial expert as defined pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
·if the Committee deems it applicable, whether the candidate would be considered independent under the NASDAQ rules and the Board’s additional independence guidelines set forth in Peapack-Gladstone’s Corporate Governance Principles;
·demonstrated character and reputation, both personal and professional, consistent with that required for a bank director;
·willingness to apply sound and independent business judgment;
·ability to work productively with the other members of the Board;
·availability for the substantial duties and responsibilities of a Peapack-Gladstone director; and
·meets the additional criteria set forth in the Peapack-Gladstone’s Corporate Governance Principles.

 

You can obtain a copy of the full text of our policy regarding shareholder nominationsrecommendations for director candidates by writing to MaryTodd M. Russell,Poland, Corporate Secretary, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, P.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921.

 

Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy and Corporate Governance Principles

 

Peapack-Gladstone has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy, which applies to Peapack-Gladstone’s chairman, chief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and to all other Peapack-Gladstoneof Peapack-Gladstone’s directors, officers and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy is available in the Government Documents portion of the Investor Relations section of Peapack-Gladstone’s website located at www.pgbank.com. The Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it from Mary M. Russell, Corporate Secretary, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, P.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey, 07921. Peapack-Gladstone will disclose any substantive amendments to or waiver from provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy on our website as may be required and within the time period specified under applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules.

 

As noted above, we have also adopted Corporate Governance Principles, which are intended to provide guidelines for the governance 8

Table of Peapack-Gladstone by the Board and its committees. The Corporate Governance Principles are available at the Investor Relations section of Peapack-Gladstone’s website located at www.pgbank.com.Contents

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The following table summarizes the compensation of the non-employee directors of Peapack-Gladstone in 2015.2017. Douglas L. Kennedy, as a full-time employee, was not compensated for his service rendered as a director.

 

Name Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash (1)
 Stock
Awards
(2)
 Change in Pension Value and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Earnings (3) (4)
 Total
Susan A. Cole $31,300  $6,189  $  $37,489 
Anthony J. Consi, II  77,800   27,715      105,515 
Richard Daingerfield  64,300   3,084   1,438   68,822 
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.  53,600   16,218   1,257   71,075 
John D. Kissel  29,500   9,021      38,521 
James R. Lamb, Esq.  39,700   9,315   12,522   61,537 

Name Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash (1)
 Stock
Awards
(2)
 Change in Pension Value and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Earnings (3) (4)
 Total
Edward A. Merton  31,500   7,868   18,619   57,987 
F. Duffield Meyercord  105,000   61,933      166,933 
Philip W. Smith, III  32,400   12,441      44,841 
Beth Welsh  37,900   9,986   1,250   49,136 

Name Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash (1)
 Stock Awards Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (2) (3)
 Total
Carmen M. Bowser (4) $12,200  $  $  $12,200 
Susan A. Cole  49,700   9,836      59,536 
Anthony J. Consi, II  127,950   54,116      182,066 
Richard Daingerfield  110,300   36,176      146,476 
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.  97,400   29,040      126,440 
John D. Kissel  48,800   9,174      57,974 
James R. Lamb, Esq.  67,800   12,393      80,193 
F. Duffield Meyercord  148,950   130,645      279,595 
Philip W. Smith, III  49,700   10,558      60,258 
Tony Spinelli (5)  33,000         33,000 
Beth Welsh  68,300   12,092      80,392 

 

(1)In 2015,2017, Peapack-Gladstone paid its directors a $10,000 annual retainer for service on the Board, $1,200 and $900 each for Nominating and Trust committee meetings, respectively, attended and $2,000 for each regular Board, Executive or CEO Advisory Committee meeting they attend and $900 each for all other committee meetingsmeeting they attend. The ChairmanChair received an additional $50,000$75,000 annual retainer. The Audit Committee Chair received an additional $25,000 annual retainer, while the Compensation Committee and Risk Committee Chairs eachChair received an additional $15,000 annual retainer. Theretainer and the Nominating Committee ChairmanChair received an additional $7,000 annual retainer. Audit Committee members received an additional $3,000 annual retainer and Compensation Committee members received an additional $2,000 annual retainer. Douglas L. Kennedy, Frank A. Kissel and Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr., as full-time employees, were not compensated for services rendered as directors. In 2015, Frank A. Kissel received $200,000 in compensation for his services as an employee, $27,060 for auto allowance and $2,939 for BOLI premiums.

(2)Each director also received an annual equity award for service on the Board in the form of restricted stock. The following table represents the number of restricted shares awarded to each director during 2015, the grant date fair market value of these awards computed in accordance with ASC 718 and the aggregate number of options or restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2015, for each of the following directors:
Name Number of
Shares of
Restricted Stock
Awarded in 2015
 Grant Date Fair
Market Value of
Stock Awarded (a)
 Aggregate Number
of Options
Outstanding at
12/31/2015
 Aggregate Number
of Restricted Stock
Awards
Outstanding at
12/31/2015
Susan A. Cole  295  $6,189      295 
Anthony J. Consi, II  1,321   27,715   17,120   2,822 
Richard Daingerfield  147   3,084      147 
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.  773   16,218   2,500   1,664 
John D. Kissel  430   9,021   17,120   870 
James R. Lamb, Esq.  444   9,315   17,120   1,004 
Edward A. Merton  375   7,868   17,120   945 
F. Duffield Meyercord  2,952   61,933   17,120   5,510 
Philip W. Smith, III  593   12,441   17,120   1,389 
Beth Welsh  476   9,986   2,500   1,076 
(a)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards in accordance with ASC 718, see Note 12 – Stock-Based Compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for additional information on the valuation methodology. The 1998 and 2002 Stock Option Plans for Outside Directors provide for the award of non-qualified stock options to non-employee directors. The 2006 and 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan provides for the award of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted stock to non-employee directors. The plans provide that grants are made based upon recommendations from the Compensation Committee to the Board.
Under each of the plans, the exercise price for the option shares may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant of the option. The options granted under these plans are, in general, exercisable not earlier than one year after the date of grant, at a price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, and expire not more than ten years after the date of grant.
Shares awarded vest in three equal annual installments commencing with the first anniversary of the grant date.
(3)Peapack-Gladstone hashad provided a retirement plan, the Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation Amended and Restated Director’s Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), for eligible non-employee directors of Peapack-Gladstone and/or its subsidiaries. The amended plan provides five years of annual benefits to directors with ten or more years of service, which commence after a director has retired from the Board. The annual benefit is equal to $40,000, with an additional $10,000 paid to the chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees and an additional $10,000 paid to the Chairman. No director was credited with more

10

than ten years of service when the plan became effective, regardless of how long the person had served as directorExpenses accrued were $981,000 as of the effective date. If a directorDecember 31, 2016. The Plan was terminated during 2017 with ten years of service ceasesfinal distributions to be a director as a result of death or disability, or a director with five years of service ceasesmade in April 2018 to be a director following a change in control, the directoreach eligible director. Distributions will be credited with a totalin the amount accrued as of 15 years of service for plan purposes. In the event that the director dies prior to receipt of all benefits, the payments continue to the director's beneficiary or estate.December 31, 2016.
(4)(3)The amount in this column represents the change in pension value. There were no above-market, nonqualified deferred compensation earnings. There was no change in pension value in 2017 due to the termination of the plan in 2017 with final distribution in 2018 to be in the amount accrued as of December 31, 2016.
(4)Ms. Bowser joined the Board of Directors effective September 28, 2017.
(5)Mr. Spinelli joined the Board of Directors effective May 25, 2017.

The following table represents the number of restricted shares awarded to each director during 2017, the grant date fair market value of these awards computed in accordance with ASC 718 and the aggregate number of options or restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2017, for each of the following directors.

Name Number of Shares of
Restricted Stock
Awarded in 2017
 Grant Date Fair
Market Value of Stock
Awarded (a)
 Aggregate Number
of Options
Outstanding at
12/31/2017
 Aggregate Number
of Restricted Stock
Awards
Outstanding at
12/31/2017
Carmen M. Bowser    $       
Susan A. Cole  327   9,836      426 
Anthony J. Consi, II  1,748   54,116   5,000   2,189 
Richard Daingerfield  1,172   36,176      1,221 
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.  945   29,040   2,500   1,203 
John D. Kissel  305   9,174   14,810   449 
James R. Lamb, Esq.  412   12,393   12,500   560 
F. Duffield Meyercord  4,190   130,645   12,500   5,174 
Philip W. Smith, III  351   10,558   12,500   549 
Tony Spinelli            
Beth Welsh  402   12,092   2,500   561 

(a)       Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards in accordance with ASC 718. See Note 12 – Stock-Based Compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for additional information on the valuation methodology.

 9

Table of Contents

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth as of February 29, 2016March 15, 2018 certain information as to beneficial ownership of each person known to Peapack-Gladstone to own beneficially more than 5five percent of the outstanding common stock of Peapack-Gladstone.

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature

of Beneficial Ownership

 

Percent of Class

   

Entities affiliated with The Banc Funds

Company LLC (1)

20 North Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

1,324,0198.10%
   

Wellington Management Company LLP (2)

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

1,362,2758.33%
   

Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C. (3)

645 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor

New York, NY 10022

832,8795.09%
   

BlackRock Inc. (4)

55 East 52d Street

New York, NY 10055

830,4615.08%
   

James M. Weichert (5)

1625 State Highway 10

Morris Plains, NJ 07950

1,070,480

 

6.55%
   

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature

of Beneficial Ownership

 

Percent of Class

   

Entities affiliated with The Banc Funds

Company LLC (1)

20 North Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

1,472,2637.77%
   

James M. Weichert (2)

1625 State Highway 10

Morris Plains, NJ 07950

1,070,480

 

5.65%
   

BlackRock Inc. (3)

55 East 52d Street

New York, NY 10055

1,066,7945.63%
   

Wellington Management Group, LLP (4)

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

964,3165.09%


_________________________
(1)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2016 by The Banc Funds Company, LLC. The filing discloses that as of December 31, 2015, The Banc Funds Company, LLC has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,324,019 shares of our common stock.14, 2018.
(2)Based on a Schedule 13G/13D/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016 by Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management”). The filing discloses that as of December 31, 2015, Wellington Management, has shared voting power with respect to 1,333,355 and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,362,275 shares of our common stock.April 30, 2014.
(3)Based on a Schedule 13G/13D/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016 by Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C. The filing discloses that as of December 31, 2015, Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C. has shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 832,879 shares of our common stock.January 24, 2018.
(4)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 27, 2016 by BlackRock Inc. The filing discloses that as of December 31, 2015, BlackRock Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 814,716 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 830,461 shares of our common stock.February 18, 2018.
(5)Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on April 30, 2014 by James M. Weichert. The filing discloses that as of March 12, 2014, James M. Weichert has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,070,480 shares of our common stock.

11

 

Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth as of March 2, 201615, 2018 the number of shares of Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s common stock, beneficially owned by each of the directors/nominees and the executive officers of Peapack-Gladstone for whom individual information is required to be set forth in this proxy statement (the “named executive officers”) pursuant to the regulations of the SEC, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.

Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)Percent of Class (2)
John P. Babcock80,352(3)*
Jeffrey J. Carfora92,984(4)*
Finn M. W. Caspersen, Jr.90,122(5)*
Dr. Susan A. Cole835(6)*
Anthony J. Consi, II103,547(7)*
Richard Daingerfield3,954(8)*
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.6,990(9)*
Douglas L. Kennedy156,714(10)*
John D. Kissel62,981(11)*
James R. Lamb38,734(12)*
F. Duffield Meyercord60,587(13)*
Philip W. Smith, III65,706(14)*
Eric H. Waser14,499(15)*
Beth Welsh4,864(16)*

All directors and executive officers

as a group (18 persons)

885,968(17)5.42%

 10

Table of Contents

Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)Percent of Class (2)
John P. Babcock88,581(3)*
Carmen M. Bowser400(1)*
Jeffrey J. Carfora101,508(4)0.54
Lisa P. Chalkan8,506(6)*
Dr. Susan A. Cole1,623(7)*
Anthony J. Consi, II99,079(8)0.52
Richard Daingerfield5,870(9)*
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.9,501(10)*
Steven A. Kass1,000(1)*
Douglas L. Kennedy165,691(11)0.87
John D. Kissel60,725(12)*
James R. Lamb35,640(13)*
F. Duffield Meyercord81,330(14)*
Robert Plante-*
Philip W. Smith, III63,089(15)*
Anthony Spinelli430(1)*
Beth Welsh6,440(16)*
All directors and executive officers
as a group (25 persons)987,895(17)4.84%

 

NOTES:

*Less than one-half of one percent
(1)Beneficially owned shares include shares over which the named person exercises either sole or shared voting power or sole or shared investment power. It also includes shares owned (i)(1) by a spouse, minor children or by relatives sharing the same home, (ii)(2) by entities owned or controlled by the named person and (iii)(3) by other persons if the named person has the right to acquire such shares within 60 days by the exercise of any right or option. Unless otherwise noted, all shares are owned of record or beneficially by the named person.
(2)The number of shares of common stock used in calculating the percentage of the class owned by all directors and executive officers as a group includes shares of common stock outstanding as of March 2, 2016,15, 2018, 54,305 restricted stock units vesting within 60 days, and 98,72061,050 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.15, 2018.
(3)This total includes 69,426Includes 5,325 shares allocated under Peapack-Gladstone’s 401(k) Plan, 41,393 shares of restricted stock.stock awards, and 20,631 shares of restricted stock units.
(4)This total includes 634Includes 963 shares allocated to Mr. Carfora under Peapack-Gladstone's Profit SharingPeapack-Gladstone’s 401(k) Plan, 1,7693,920 shares purchased forunder the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 19,915 shares of restricted stock awards, and 12,186 shares of restricted stock units.
(5)Includes 1,433 shares allocated under Peapack-Gladstone’s 401(k) Plan, 135 shares purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 38,88217,036 shares of restricted stock.stock awards.
(5)(6)This total includes 1,333Includes 270 shares allocated to Mr. Caspersen under Peapack-Gladstone's Profit SharingPeapack-Gladstone’s 401(k) Plan, 1,834 shares purchased for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 45,0182,025 shares of restricted stock awards, and 5,2508,068 shares of restricted stock units.
(7)Includes 99 shares of restricted stock awards and 327 shares of restricted stock units.
(8)Includes 441 shares of restricted stock awards, 1,748 shares of restricted stock units, and 5,000 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.
(6)This total includes 295 shares of restricted stock.
(7)This total includes 2,822 shares of restricted stock and 16,620 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.
(8)This total includes 147 shares of restricted stock.15, 2018.
(9)This total includes 1,664Includes 49 shares of restricted stock awards and 1,172 shares of restricted stock units.
(10)Includes 258 shares of restricted stock awards, 945 shares of restricted stock units, and 2,500 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.
(10)This total includes 109,478 shares of restricted stock and 1,738 shares purchased for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.15, 2018.
(11)This total includesIncludes 7,424 shares allocated under Peapack-Gladstone’s 401(k) Plan, 3,900 shares purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 49,740 shares of restricted stock awards, and 38,957 shares of restricted stock units.

 11

Table of Contents

(12)Includes 1,789 shares owned by Mr. John D. Kissel'sKissel’s wife, 4,224 shares owned by Mr. Kissel'sKissel’s children, 870144 shares of restricted stock awards, 305 shares of restricted stock units, and 16,62012,500 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.15, 2018.

12

(12)(13)This total includesIncludes 1,684 shares owned by Mr. Lamb'sLamb’s wife, 1,004148 shares of restricted stock awards, 412 shares of restricted stock units, and 16,62012,500 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.15, 2018.
(13)(14)This total includes 5,510Includes 984 shares of restricted stock awards, 4,190 shares of restricted stock units, and 16,62012,500 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.15, 2018.
(14)(15)This total includes 8,243Includes 8,361 shares owned by Mr. Smith'sSmith’s wife, 1,335 shares owned by Mr. Smith’s management company, 1,389198 shares of restricted stock awards, 351 shares of restricted stock units, and 16,62012,500 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.
(15)This total includes 9,532 shares of restricted stock and 833 shares purchased for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.15, 2018.
(16)This total includes 1,076Includes 159 shares of restricted stock awards, 402 shares of restricted stock units, and 2,500 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2016.15, 2018.
(17)This total includes 326,685Includes 149,405 shares of restricted stock 98,720awards, 152,221 shares of restricted stock units, and 61,050 shares purchasable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 201615, 2018 and 25,03234,500 shares held in a margin account.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

In 2015,2017, the Board of Directors updated the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Stock Ownership Guidelines apply to the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and the named executive officers of the Company and impose the following requirements:

 

·All new members elected to the Board must own a minimum of $10,000 in Company stock at the time of his or her appointment;
·Directors must maintain five times the amount of the Company annual equity award for service on the Board;
·The Chief Executive Officer must maintain three times his or her base salary in Company stock; and
·ExecutiveNamed executive officers must maintain one time his or her base salary in Company stock.

 

Individuals can count shares owned in a Company benefit plan towards the stock ownership requirement. There is no set compliance period to meet the guidelines, with the exception of the minimum ownership requirement applicable to new Board members.members, which must be met at the time of a new Board member’s appointment. However, until the guidelines are achieved, individuals will be required to retain 100% of any net shares received through a Company grant under the 2012 Long TermLong-Term Incentive Plan.

 

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board has 13 members. Peapack-Gladstone’s Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that the 13 current directors be re-elected for one-year terms expiring at Peapack-Gladstone’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. If, for any reason, any of the nominees become unavailable for election, the proxy solicited by the Board may be voted for a substitute nominee selected by the Board. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the named nominees is unavailable for election or will not serve if elected.

Unless a shareholder indicates otherwise on the proxy, the proxy will be voted for the persons named in the table below to serve until the expiration of their terms, and thereafter until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the Board’s nominees for election, the nominees’ positions with Peapack-Gladstone (if any), the principal occupation or employment of each nominee for the past five years and the period during which each nominee has served as a director of Peapack-Gladstone. The nominee’s prior service as a director includes prior service as a director of the Bank prior to the formation of the holding company. In addition, described below is each director nominee’s particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that have led the Board to conclude that the person should serve as a director.

 12

Table of Contents

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS

Name and Position
With Peapack-
Gladstone
 Age Director
Since
 

Principal Occupation or Employment for the Past Five Years;

Other Company Directorships

Carmen M. Bowser 63 2017 Retired; former Managing Vice President, Commercial Real Estate Division, Capital One Bank. Ms. Bowser is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of her extensive experience in the commercial real estate market, which includes serving as Managing Vice President, Commercial Real Estate Division at Capital One Bank and as Managing Director for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company. Her expertise and leadership experience will be invaluable to the oversight of the Company’s real estate portfolio.
Dr. Susan A. Cole 75 2014 President of Montclair State University.  Dr. Cole is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of her 19 years as President of Montclair State University, the second largest university in New Jersey, with approximately 20,000 students, which provides invaluable experience in the oversight of Bank operations.
Anthony J. Consi, II 72 2000 Retired; previously Senior Vice President of Finance and Operations, Weichert Realtors. Mr. Consi is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 15 years of public accounting experience at Coopers & Lybrand and his 22 years of finance and operations leadership at Weichert Realtors, both of which are invaluable to his role as Audit Committee Chair.
Richard Daingerfield 64 2014 Retired; Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts from 2010 to 2014.  Mr. Daingerfield is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his expertise in corporate governance, executive management, risk management, corporate banking and commercial banking. His broad legal experience in all aspects of commercial and retail banking, including international and domestic private banking, are invaluable to his role as Risk Committee Chair.
Edward A. Gramigna, Jr. 57 2012 Partner of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Mr. Gramigna is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 28 years of experience in trust, estate planning and estate administration, which is invaluable in the oversight of our wealth management division.
Steven A. Kass 62 2018 Retired; Previously senior partner of KPMG from 2014 to 2016.  Mr. Kass was Chief Executive Officer of Rothstein Kass, an accounting firm that specialized in audit, tax and advisory services to hedge fund, private equity and venture capital clients, before it was sold to KPMG in 2014. Mr. Kass is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his public company accounting and management level experience.

Douglas L. Kennedy

Chief Executive Officer

 61 2012 President and CEO of Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank since 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kennedy served as Executive Vice President and Market President at Capital One Bank/North Fork and held key executive level positions with Summit Bank and Bank of America/Fleet Bank. Mr. Kennedy, who began his career in commercial banking in 1978, is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 39 years of commercial banking experience, demonstrated business leadership, judgment and vision.
John D. Kissel 65 1987 Retired: former Real Estate Broker, Turpin Real Estate, Inc. Mr. Kissel is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 27 years of experience in the residential real estate market, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of the Bank’s real estate loan portfolio.
James R. Lamb 75 1993 Attorney at Law. Mr. Lamb is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 50 years of legal experience, which is invaluable to the Board’s corporate governance program and the Board’s oversight of the Bank’s legal and regulatory affairs.

 13

Table of Contents

Name and Position
With Peapack-
Gladstone
 Age Director
Since
 

Principal Occupation or Employment for the Past Five Years;

Other Company Directorships

F. Duffield Meyercord Chair 71 1991 Chair of the Board of Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank; Partner of Carl Marks Advisory Group, LLC; President, Meyercord Advisors, Inc. Mr. Meyercord is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 42 years of experience in directing strategic projects and providing operational advisory services to numerous businesses, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of corporate strategy.
Philip W. Smith, III 62 1995 President, Phillary Management, Inc., a real estate management company. Mr. Smith is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of his 30 years of experience in commercial real estate agency and management, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of the Company’s real estate loan portfolio.
Tony Spinelli 50 2017 Chief Operating Officer and President, Cyberdivision for Fractal Industries, Inc.  Mr. Spinelli also served as Senior Vice President, Chief Information Security Officer, Capital One Bank. Mr. Spinelli is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because his expertise in cybersecurity, security engineering and compliance will provide insight into emerging threats to the Company and our clients.
Beth Welsh 59 2012 General Manager of Bassett Associates, a real estate management company in Summit, New Jersey.  Ms. Welsh is qualified to serve on the Board of Directors because of her 22 years of experience in the commercial real estate market as well as her past banking experience, which is invaluable to the Board’s oversight of the Company’s real estate lending and small business banking.

The members of our Board of Directors collectively demonstrate appropriate leadership skills, experience and judgment in areas that are relevant to our business. We believe that their collective ability to challenge and stimulate management and their dedication to the affairs of the Company serve the interests of the Company and its shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE

DIRECTORS INCLUDED IN PROPOSAL 1.

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are competitive, are focused on pay-for-performance principles and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We also believe that both the Company and our shareholders benefit from responsive corporate governance policies and constructive and consistent dialogue. The proposal described below, commonly known as a “Say on Pay” proposal, gives you, as a shareholder of Peapack-Gladstone the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation for our named executive officers by voting to approve or not approve such compensation as described in this proxy statement. We currently hold our “Say on Pay” vote on an annual basis.officers.

 

As part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), Congress adopted Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, pursuant to which the Board is giving our shareholders thiswere provided an opportunity to approve on an advisory, or non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K.officers. Accordingly, we are asking you to approvevote on the compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s named executive officers as described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation (together with the accompanying narrative disclosure) in this proxy statement. Your vote is advisory and will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

 

 14

Table of Contents

The following summarizes the backgrounds of the named executive officers.

 

·Mr. Kennedy joined the Bank in October 2012 as Chief Executive Officer. He is a career banker with over 3840 years of commercial banking experience. Previously, Mr. Kennedy served as Executive Vice President and Market President at Capital One Bank/North Fork and held key executive level positions with Summit Bank and Bank of American/Fleet Bank. Mr. Kennedy has a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics and a MBA from Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Connecticut.

·Mr. Carfora joined the Bank in April 2009 as Chief Financial Officer having previously served as a Transitional Officer with New York Community Bank from April 2007 until January 2008 as a result of a merger with PennFed Financial Services Inc. and Penn Federal Savings Bank (collectively referred to as “PennFed”). Prior to the merger, Mr. Carfora served as Chief Operating Officer of PennFed from October 2001 until April 2007 and Chief Financial Officer from December 1993 to October 2001. Mr. Carfora has nearly 3638 years of experience, including 3335 years in the banking industry. Mr. Carfora has a Bachelor’s degreeDegree in Accounting and a MBAan M.B.A in Finance, both from Fairleigh Dickinson University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

 

·Mr. Caspersen has nearly 21 years of experience, including 12 years in the banking industry. Mr. CaspersenPlante joined the Bank in March 2017 as Chief Risk Officer in March 2004 and was promoted to General Counsel in May 2006. He was elected to the Board of Directors in April 2012.Operating Officer. Mr. Caspersen was named Senior Executive Vice President,Plante previously served as Chief Operating Officer at Israel Discount Bank New York. Mr. Plante also served as Chief Information Officer at CIT Group and General Counselalso held senior leadership positions at GE Capital Global Consumer Finance and with the Geary Corporation, a privately held IT consulting Company. Mr. Plante has a Bachelor of Science in 2013. Prior to joiningBusiness Administration in Finance, from the Bank, Mr. Caspersen worked in the fieldsUniversity of venture capital, investment banking and corporate law. Mr. Caspersen is a graduate of Harvard Law School and Harvard College.Vermont.

 

·Mr. Babcock joined the Bank in March 2014 as Senior Executive Vice President of the Bank and President of Private Wealth Management. Mr. Babcock has 3537 years of experience in commercial and wealth management/private bank businesses in New York City and regional markets through mergers, expansions, rapid growth and periods of significant organizational change. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Babcock was the managing director in charge of the Northeast Mid-Atlantic region for the HSBC Private Bank. Mr. Babcock graduated from Tulane University’s A.B. Freeman School of Business and has an M.B.A. from Fairleigh Dickinson University. Mr. Babcock holds FINRA Series 7, 63 and 24 securities licenses.

 

·Eric H. WaserMs. Chalkan joined the bankjoined the Bank in 2015 asApril 2015. Ms. Chalkan has more than 30 years of financial services experience with a concentration in risk management, credit administration, underwriting and managing of policies and procedures. Ms. Chalkan was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer in April 2016. Prior to joining Peapack-Gladstone Bank in 2015, Ms. Chalkan served key roles at Capital One N.A. as Senior Vice President, Head of Commercial BankingPolicy; Director of Loan Administration/Commercial Banking; and Manager of Middle Market Underwriting/New Jersey. Prior to her tenure at Peapack-Gladstone Bank. He is responsible for the oversight and growthCapital One, Ms. Chalkan held key positions at Bank of the Bank’s commercial and industrial lending business. Eric has more than 25 years of experience in financial services and private banking, most recently serving as managing director for Citibank’s East Business Banking Division, which achieved superior growth and risk adjusted returns through his direction. Throughout his career, as president of Mid Atlantic Corporate Banking, CEO-NJ and managing director at SovereignAmerica/Fleet Bank, and executive vice president at Fleet Boston Financial/Nat WestHSBC Bank Eric focused on all aspects of RetailUSA/HSBC Securities, Inc. as Vice President, Underwriting Manager, in Small Business Services and Commercial Banking Segments including: business banking, middle market, large corporate, leveraged lending, and professional services, healthcare and not for profit specialty segments. Mr. WaserRisk Review Field Manager, respectively. Ms. Chalkan holds a Bachelor of Science degreeArts Degree in Economics from Indiana University, Kelly School of Business and has taught extensively on advanced credit, sales and leadership training topics and programs.Rutgers University.

RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSAL 2

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE NON-BINDING APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS DETERMINED BYOFFICERS.

PROPOSAL 3

AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEERESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES

The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders approve an amendment to Article Fourth of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company that would increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 21,000,000 (as presently authorized) to 42,000,000 shares. The Board of Directors unanimously voted to approve this amendment and to recommend that shareholders approve it.

As of March 15, 2018, 19,013,821 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, and 408,178 shares of common stock were held as treasury shares. In addition, approximately 847,804 shares are subject to restricted and performance stock awards. As a result, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance, after taking into account shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s employee stock plans, is 732,808.

The Board believes that the availability of additional authorized shares of common stock will provide the Company with additional flexibility to issue common stock for a variety of general corporate purposes as the Board may determine to

 15

Table of Contents

be desirable including, without limitation, stock splits (including splits effected through the declaration of stock dividends), raising capital, future financings, investment opportunities, acquisitions, or other distributions. The Board has not authorized the Company to take any action with respect to the shares that would be authorized under this proposal, and the Company currently does not have any definitive plans, arrangements or understandings with respect to the issuance of the additional shares of common stock authorized by the proposed amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.

The proposed amendment to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect or delay or prevent a change in control of the Company by providing the Company the capability to engage in actions that would be dilutive to a potential acquiror, to pursue alternative transactions, or to otherwise increase the potential cost to acquire control of the Company. Thus, while the Company currently has no intent to employ the additional unissued authorized shares as an anti-takeover device, the proposed amendment and the future issuance of additional shares of common stock may have the effect of discouraging future unsolicited takeover attempts. The Board is not aware of any such attempt to take control of the Company, and would act in the best interest of shareholders if any attempt was made. The proposed amendment has been prompted by business and financial considerations. The proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock will not change the number of shares of common stock outstanding, nor will it have any immediate dilutive effect or change the rights of current holders of the Company’s common stock. However, the issuance of additional shares of common stock authorized by this amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation may occur at times or under circumstances as to have a dilutive effect on earnings per share, book value per share or the percentage voting or ownership interest of the present holders of the Company’s common stock, none of whom have preemptive rights under the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to subscribe for additional securities that the Company may issue.

Once the proposed amendment is approved, no further action by the shareholders would be necessary prior to the issuance of additional shares of common stock unless required by law or the rules of any stock exchange or national securities association on which the common stock is then listed or quoted. Under the proposed amendment, each of the newly authorized shares of common stock will have the same rights and privileges as currently authorized common stock. Adoption of the proposed amendment will not affect the rights of the holders of currently outstanding common stock of the Company nor will it change the par value of the common stock. The proposed amendment to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock does not change the number of shares of preferred stock that the Company is authorized to issue. The last increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock was approved by the shareholders in 2009.

If the proposed amendment is adopted, it will become effective upon filing of Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the New Jersey Secretary of State.

The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL TO AMEND THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES.

PROPOSAL 4

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors appointed Crowe Horwath LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. Representatives from Crowe Horwath LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting to answer questions and they will have the opportunity to speak if desired. The Audit Committee will consider the outcome of our shareholders’ vote in connection with the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP, but is not bound by the vote. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether a different independent registered public accounting firm should be selected.

 16

Table of Contents

Aggregate fees for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 billed by Crowe Horwath LLP were as follows:

Type of Service 2017  2016 
Audit Fees $470,000  $400,000 
Audit-Related Fees (1)  145,208   156,750 
Total $615,208  $556,750 

(1)Includes fees for procedures related to the offering of subordinated debt and consents for registration statements for 2017 and for Peapack-Gladstone common stock offering and consents for registration statements for 2016.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE HORWATH AS DISCLOSED INOUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND TABULAR AND RELATED NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE INCLUDED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2018.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures

The Audit Committee maintains a policy concerning the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to Peapack-Gladstone. The policy requires that all services to be performed by Peapack-Gladstone’s independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services, audit-related services and permitted non-audit services, be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Specific services being provided by the independent registered public accounting firm are regularly reviewed in accordance with the pre-approval policy. At subsequent Audit Committee meetings, the Audit Committee receives updates on the services actually provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, and management may present additional services for approval. All services rendered by Crowe Horwath LLP are permissible under applicable laws and regulations. Each new engagement of Crowe Horwath LLP in 2017 was approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Report

To the Board of Directors of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation:

The Company’s management is responsible for the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and issuing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The independent registered public accounting firm is also responsible for issuing an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on criteria issued by the Committee on Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s internal control over financial reporting on behalf of the Board of Directors.

In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

We have discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and have discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. In concluding that the independent registered public accounting firm is independent, the Audit Committee considered, among other factors, whether the non-audit services provided by the firm were compatible with its independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting process.

 17

Table of Contents

In performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity. In its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management, which has the primary responsibility for financial statements and reports, and of the independent registered public accounting firm that, in its report, expresses an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide it with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal control over financial reporting designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm do not assure that the Company’s financial statements are presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, that the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) or that the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is “independent.”

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommend to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Audit Committee
of the Board oF Directors

Anthony J. Consi, II, Chair

Richard Daingerfield

Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.

  Steven A. Kass

James R. Lamb, Esq.

  Beth Welsh

 

 

March 15, 2018

 18

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

The following is a discussion and analysis of our compensation programs as they apply to our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the three other most highly compensated individuals who were serving as executive officers at the end of fiscal 20152017, and one highly compensated former executive officer (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

 

Executive Summary

 

20152017 Financial Highlights and Company Performance

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“Committee”(the “Committee”) believes that the Company, under the leadership and guidance of its CEO and other named executive officers, has been successful in executing its Strategic Plan – “Expanding Our Reach.” The Strategic Plan focuses on the client experience and aggressively building and maintaining a private banking platform.

 

In particular, the Committee noted the following factors, which it believes demonstrated the success of the Company and of the CEO and other named executive officers individually in 2015:2017:


·For the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Company reflected year over year improvement in revenue, earnings, returns,profitability and efficiency,asset quality, as shown in the table below:
       Improvement        
 2015 2015   2015 Adjusted        
(Dollars in millions, except EPS) As Reported Adjusted(A) 2014 vs 2014  2017 2016 Improvement 2017
vs. 2016
Pretax income $32.14  $34.64  $24.29  $10.35   43% $54.31  $42.74  $11.57   27%
Net income $19.97  $21.53  $14.89  $6.64   45% $36.50  $26.48  $10.02   38%
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) $1.29  $1.39  $1.22  $0.17   14% $2.03  $1.60  $0.43   27%
Total revenue $108.17  $108.17  $88.70  $19.47   22% $145.77  $125.35  $20.42   16%
                                    
Return on average assets  0.64%  0.69%  0.63%  0.06       0.89%  0.72%  0.17%    
Return on average equity  7.71%  8.31%  7.96%  0.35       10.12%  8.92%  1.20%    
Efficiency ratio  63.80%  61.71%  67.45%  (5.74)    
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets  0.37%  0.30%  0.07%    

 

(A)2015 adjusted excludes $2.5 million of charges related to the closure of two branch offices, as previously announced. Exclusion of these charges increases pretax income by $2.5 million, net income by $1.6 million, earnings per share by $0.10 per share, ROAA by 0.05%, and ROAE by 0.60%, and decreases the efficiency ratio by 2.09%.

·At December 31, 2015,2017, the market value of assets under management/assets under administration (AUA) at the Private Wealth Management Division of Peapack-Gladstone Bank (“(the “Bank”) increased $1.8 billion to $5.5 billion from $3.7 billion at December 31, 2016, reflecting growth of 49 percent. Organic growth was $500 million of the Bank”) was $3.32$1.8 billion includingin growth, while acquisitions accounted for $1.3 billion of the acquisition of Wealth Management Consultants, which occurred in May 2015. Year over year growth in AUA totaled 11 percent for 2015.growth.
·Fee income from the Private Wealth Management Division totaled $17.0 million for 2015, growing from $15.2 million for 2014. Year over year growth in wealth management fee income was 12 percent, despite a relatively flat stock market in 2015.

·Loans (including Loans Held for Sale) at December 31, 20152017 totaled $3.0$3.71 billion. This reflected net growth of $745$392 million, net of participations sold,or 12 percent, when compared to $2.3the $3.31 billion at December 31, 2014. Year over year net2016. This loan growth was 33 percent.
·Multifamily loan participations sold in 2015 totaled approximately $200 million.
·Commercial & Industrial (C&I) loans at December 31, 2015 totaled $513 million. This reflected growth of $204 million when compared to the $309 million at December 31, 2014. Year over year C&I loan growth was 66 percent.
·Totalprincipally funded by “customer” deposit balancesgrowth (defined as deposits excluding brokered CDs and brokered “overnight” interest-bearing demand deposits) grew $663 million.

·Total “customer” deposit balances amounted to $2.64$3.45 billion at December 31, 2015 from $1.982017. This reflected net growth of $308 million (10 percent) when compared to $3.14 billion of total “customer” deposit balances at December 31, 2014. Year over year customer deposit growth totaled 33 percent.2016.

·Asset quality metrics continued to be strong at December 31, 2015.2017. Nonperforming assets at December 31, 20152017 were just $7.3$15.6 million, or 0.220.37 percent of total assets. Total loans past due 30 through 89 days and still accruing were only $2.1 millionjust $246 thousand, or 0.01 percent of total loans at December 31, 2015.2017.

·The Company’s net interest income for 2015 was $84.5 million. This reflected improvement when compared to $67.9 million for 2014. Year over year growth in net interest income was 24 percent.
·The book value per shareand Bank’s capital ratios at December 31, 2015 of $17.61 reflected improvement when2017 all increased compared to $16.36 atthe December 31, 2014. Year over year growth in book value per share totaled 8 percent.
·For 2015, overall results2016 levels. These capital positions were better than our budget/plan for 2015 (“2015 Budget”) as shown in the table below.
           Achievement 
  2015  2015  2015  2015 As Adjusted 
(Dollars in millions, except EPS) As Reported  Adjusted(A)  Budget  Vs 2015 Budget 
Pretax income $32.14  $34.64  $31.70  $2.94   9%
Net income $19.97  $21.53  $19.02  $2.51   13%
Diluted EPS $1.29  $1.39  $1.23  $0.16   13%
Total revenue $108.17  $108.17  $104.65  $3.52     

                     
Return on average assets  0.64%  0.69%  0.62%  0.07   11%
Return on average equity  7.71%  8.31%  7.42%  0.89   12%
Efficiency ratio  63.80%  61.71%  63.02%  (1.31)    

(A)2015 adjusted excludes $2.5benefitted by net income of $36.50 million and $36.59 million of charges relatedvoluntary share purchases under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Further, during 2017 the Company’s and Bank’s regulatory capital positions were also benefitted by $34.1 million of net proceeds from the mid-December 2017 subordinated debt issuance, and the subsequent downstream of a large portion of the proceeds to the closure of two branch offices,Bank as previously announced. Exclusion of these charges increases pretax income by $2.5 million, net income by $1.6 million, earnings per share by $0.10 per share, ROAA by 0.05%, and ROAE by 0.60%, and decreases the efficiency ratio by 2.09%.  regulatory capital.

 

Budget achievement is based on pretax income and net income, with consideration given to earnings per share (“EPS”), return on average assets (“ROAA”), return on average equity (“ROAE”), revenue growth and asset quality.  After consideration 19

Table of 2015’s results compared to budget, we determined 2015 Company performance to be rated at maximum under theContents

2017 Executive Performance Plan based onResults

For 2017, overall results were better than our budget/plan for 2017 (“2017 Budget”) as shown in the following guidelines:table below.

        Achievement
     2017  2017 Actual vs
(Dollars in millions, except EPS) 2017  Budget  2017 Budget
Pretax income $54.31  $48.20  $6.11   13%
Net income $36.50  $29.89  $6.61   22%
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) $2.03  $1.69  $0.34��  20%
Total revenue $145.77  $139.17  $6.60   5%
                 
Return on average assets  0.89%  0.73%  0.16%    
Return on average equity  10.12%  8.62%  1.50%    
                 

For purposes of the Company’s Executive Performance Plan (the “EPP”), Company performance was measured as follows:

·Threshold – 85% to 99%99.99% of budget achievement;“2017 Budget achievement”;
·Target – 100% to 109%109.99% of budget achievement;“2017 Budget achievement”: and
·Maximum – 110% and greaterabove of budget achievement;“2017 Budget achievement.”

2017 Budget achievement is based on pretax income and net income.

After consideration of 2017’s results to budget, we considered Company’s performance to be rated at the maximum level under the Executive Performance Plan.

 

Compensation Philosophy and Program Objectives

 

The fundamental objective of the Company’s executive compensation program, the elements of which are summarized in the table below, is to fairly compensate our named executive officers at levels appropriate in our market and grant equity compensation to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders. Our compensation program is designed to retain and attract qualified executives and motivate such executives to achieve short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals that strengthen our franchise value and ultimately deliver shareholder value. We believe in a pay-for-performance philosophy that appropriately aligns our executives’ total compensation with the performance and value of their contributions and the Company’s ultimate success. In 2015, the Committee continued the Executive Performance Plan (EPP) that was adopted in 2013, which links the named executive officers’ short-term and long-term incentive compensation directly to Company and individual performance. The Executive Performance Plan is the performance-based portion of our compensation package and includes the annual cash bonus, annual equity award, and the Strategic Plan Award (SPA).

 

 ElementPurposeLink to PerformanceFixed/Performance
Based
SalaryHelps attract and retain executives through market-competitive base payChanges based on individual and corporate performanceFixed
Annual Cash
Bonus (STI)
Encourages achievement of short-term strategic and financial performance metrics that create long-term shareholder valueBased on achievement of short-term, pre-defined corporate performance objectives and an assessment of individual performancePerformance Based
Annual Equity
(LTI)
Encourages achievement of short-term strategic and financial performance metrics that create long-term shareholder valueBased on achievement of short-term, pre-defined corporate performance objectives and an assessment of individual performancePerformance Based
Strategic Plan
Award (SPA)
Motivate executives to focus on the achievement of the Company’s high performing long-term strategic planning goals50% of the awards to the CEO, CFO,  COO, and President of Private Wealth Management vestwould have vested if high performance targets arehad been met by year end 2017Performance Based
Benefits and
Perquisites
Establishes limited perquisites in line with market practice, as well as health and welfare benefits on the same basis as our general employee population--Fixed

 

 20

Table of Contents

2015Change in Future Equity Compensation Structure

For 2018, the Committee adopted a new Long-Term Incentive Plan intended to further interlace executive pay with Company performance. The new LTIP combines the dual LTI and SPA grants into one program that is separated into a performance-vested grant and a time-vested grant, with such awards related to the LTIP made under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The performance-vested portion of the LTIP is granted, with the final number of shares cliff vesting three years later based on a three-year performance period. The time-vested shares are granted based upon prior-year performance and vest equally over a three-year period. For the CEO, CFO and President of Private Wealth Management, half of the LTI grants will be performance based.

2017 CEO Compensation Decisions

 

Mr. Kennedy joined the Company in October 2012 at a base salary of $500,000. He did not receive a base salary increase in 2013, 2014, 2015 or 2015.

16

2016. Mr. Kennedy received a salary increase of 100,000 in 2017 bringing his base salary to $600,000.

Mr. Kennedy received a short-term incentive award (cash) under the EPP of $309,375.$540,000 for 2017. This award was based on 20152017 Company performance (75% weighting) and 20152017 individual performance (25% weighting). As fully described previously,above, Company performance for 20152017 was achieved at maximum.the maximum level. Individual performance for 20152017 was also rated at targetthe maximum level. The calculated amount ($412,500) was then discounted 25% in the discretion of the compensation committee.

The following includes the more significant objectives considered in determining Mr. Kennedy’s individual performance, all of which were met or exceeded: continue to expand our wealth business; continue to expand our C&I lending business; continue buildingto enhance the client experience; continue to drive risk management excellence; continue migration to a referral and sales culture;private banking model; continue to focus on expanding fee based revenue; continue to enhance communications internally with employees and externally with shareholders; review and rationalize our branch network; deliver financial results.

In March 2015,2017, Mr. Kennedy was granted a long-term incentive award (restricted stock) under the EPP of $449,979. This$449,997 and a transition award of $99,986, respectively. The EPP award was based on 20142016 Company performance (75% weighting) and 20142016 individual performance (25% weighting). Company performance for 20142016 was set at the maximum level as results weredescribed in excess of 10 percent ahead of the 2014 Budget/Plan.2017 Proxy. Individual performance for 20142016 was also set at the maximum level. Thislevel, as also described in the 2017 Proxy. See the discussion in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “2016 Financial Highlights and Company Performance” and “2016 CEO Compensation Decisions” included in our proxy statement filed on March 17, 2017 for information regarding Company and individual performance for 2016. The $449,997 grant vests in equal increments over three years and the $99,986 grant vests in equal increments over five years.

 

Summary of Key Compensation Compliance Policies

 

PolicyDescription
Stock OwnershipOur directors and NEOsnamed executive officers have stock ownership guidelinesguidelines.
ClawbackAll awards made under the EPP are subject to clawback based on inaccurate financial statements.
No Excise Tax
Gross-Ups
During 2013, we eliminated 280G tax gross-up provisions from our executive’s agreements.
Double Trigger CIC
Severance
Cash severance is not automatically triggered upon a change-in-control without a corresponding termination.
Double Trigger
Equity in CIC
On a go forward basis, the Committee intends to grantBeginning in 2017, equity which willgrants require a change-in-control along with a corresponding termination in order to trigger an acceleration of equity in the case of a change-in-control.
Anti-Hedging PolicyDuring 2016, the Committee adopted a prospective policy prohibiting our executives and directors in the future from hedging Peapack shares, including buying or selling puts or calls, short sales, or engaging in any other transaction designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Peapack’s stock.
Anti-Pledging PolicyDuring 2016, the Committee adopted a prospective policy prohibiting our executives and directors in the future from holding Peapack shares in a margin account as collateral for a margin loan or otherwise pledging Peapack shares as collateral for a loan.

 

 

 21

Table of Contents

Roles and Decision Process

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“the Committee”) is responsible for establishing and overseeing policies governing annual and long-term compensation programs for our executives, and for determining executive compensation levels in line with our philosophy. Details of the Committee’s functions are more fully described in its charter, which has been approved by the Board of Directors and is available on our website. The Chair of the Committee regularly reports on Committee actions at the Company’s Board of Directors meetings.

 

The Committee reviews all compensation components for the Company’s CEO and other named executive officers, including base salary, annual cash and equity incentives, benefits and contracts/arrangements.

 

Although the Committee makes independent determinations on all matters related to compensation of the named executive officers, certain members of management may be requested to attend or provide input to the Committee. The CEO provides advice to the Committee relative to the compensation of the other named executive officers. The Chief Executive OfficerCEO is not present for the discussion by the Committee of his compensation. Other senior officers, such as the Head of Human Capital, COO/General Counsel, the CFO, and/or the ComptrollerCFO may provide information and perspective to the Committee as appropriate and/or as requested. The Committee’s independent compensation consultant (McLagan) also provides benchmarking information and advice as appropriate. The Committee makes all of its determinations based on its holistic assessment of the Company’s performance and individual performance and on data provided by management and its independent compensation consultant.


The Committee has the sole authority to retain, terminate, obtain advice from, oversee and compensate its outside advisors, including its independent compensation consultant. The Committee has determined that it has the funding it needs to retain the advisors necessary to carry out its duties effectively. In 2013, the Committee first retained McLagan an Aon Hewitt Company, as an independent outside compensation consultant. McLagan was retained again for 2015.2017. McLagan’s 2013, 2014, and 2015 services included peer group development and market benchmarking studies, assisting with the design and subsequent review of the incentive program, and providing insight and best practices with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers as well as the Employment Agreementimplementation of employment agreements and Changechange in Control Agreement for Mr. Kennedy and the Amended Change in Control Agreements for other Executive Officers.control agreements.

 

While the Committee seeks independent external perspective, the Committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s named executive officers.

 

The Committee reviewed its relationship with McLagan and considered McLagan’s independence in light of all relevant factors, including those set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and under the applicable NasdaqNASDAQ listing rules. The Compensation Committee received a report from McLagan addressing its independence, including the following factors: (1) there were no services provided to the Company, other than compensation related to consulting services provided by McLagan; (2) fees paid by the Company as a percentage of McLagan'sAon’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by McLagan that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the senior advisors and a member of the Compensation Committee; (5) any Company stock owned by the senior advisors; and (6) any business or personal relationships between the executives and the senior advisors. The Compensation Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work performed by McLagan and McLagan'sMcLagan’s senior advisors involved in the engagements did not raise any conflict of interest.

 

Compensation Review

 

Understanding the competitive landscape is a key element the Committee considers in making compensation decisions. Each year, the Committee commissions a compensation review by its independent compensation consultant. The purpose of this review is to provide an independent and objective analysis of our total compensation relative to a peer group and industry practices. The Committee utilizes the benchmarking data and best practices information for ongoing monitoring of executive pay relative to market practices and to determine executive compensation.

 

The foundation for the review is data from a peer group of banks. In late 2014,2016, the committeeCommittee reviewed benchmarking information provided by McLagan whichthat the Committee used to set 20152017 compensation. The peer group for this study was selected by the Committee after considering recommendations from McLagan. The peer group used for executive compensation comparisons consisted of 1916 commercial banks. The selection criteria generally included: eastern U.S. commercial banks in metro areas;areas with total assets $1.1 billion to $4.7 billion;revenue between $70 million and $240 million, non-interest income to total revenue greater than 12.5% or trust and investment revenue greater than $2 million; and non-performingnonperforming assets to total assets of less than or equal to 2%. This peer group of 1916 banks had median total assets of $2.2$4.0 billion (comparable to the Company’s $2.7$3.8 billion at December 31, 2014)2016), and median revenue of $89$123 million (comparable to the Company’s $89$125 million for 2014)2016).

 

The peer group consisted of the following 1916 banks:

 

 22

Table of Contents

·     American National Bankshares·     Lakeland Bancorp
·     Arrow Financial Corp.·     Merchants Bancshares Inc.
·     Bancorp Inc.·     Metro Bancorp Inc.First of Long Island Corp.
·     Bridge Bancorp Inc.·     Middleburg Financial CorpLakeland Bancorp
·     Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.·     National Bankshares Inc.
·     Cardinal Financial Corp.·     Sandy Spring Bancorp Inc.
·     Century Bancorp Inc.Cardinal Financial Corp.·     Suffolk Bancorp
·     Century Bancorp Inc.·     Tompkins Financial Corporation
·     Chemung Financial Corp.·     TriState Capital Holdings Inc.
·     Dime Community Bancshares Inc.·     Univest Corp. of Pennsylvania
·     Enterprise Bancorp Inc.·     Washington Trust Bancorp Inc.
·     Hudson Valley Holding Corp

 

We utilized the 2014 study to set 2015 target compensation for our NEOs The following salary and estimated total compensation (at target) comparisons were considered by the Committee in determining salaries and total compensation for the named executive officers:

 

·The 2014Target 2017 salaries for the Company’s five named executive officers were 3.4% above5% below the 50th percentile and 12.0%15% below the 75th percentile of the peer group.group, on average.

18

The salaries for the CEO, COO, CFO and EVP, Commercial Banking were 4.8% below the 50th percentile and 19.0%
·2017 estimated total compensation at the target level for the Company’s named executive officers were 10% above the 50th percentile and 11% below the 75th percentile of the peer group. The salary for the President of Private Wealth Management was 35.5% above the 50th percentile and 14.9% above the 75th percentile of the peer group.  

·The 2014 estimated total compensation at target for the Company’s five named executive officers were 3.6% above the 50th percentile and 13.4% below the 75th percentile of the peer group.

The estimated total compensation at target for the CEO, COO, CFO and EVP, Commercial Banking were 4.3% above the 50th percentile and 15.0% below the 75th percentile of the peer group. The estimated total compensation at target for the President of Private Wealth Management was 1.1% above the 50th percentile and 7.0% below the 75th percentile of the peer group.  

·The salary and total compensation for the President of Private Wealth Management is generally above peer group levels as he joined the Company in 2014 with significant experience with much larger financial institutions and the Committee set his salary and total compensation at levels commensurate with this experience and competitive with the larger institutions.  

 

Say on Pay Consideration

 

The Committee also considers feedback from our shareholders in making compensation determinations. At the 20152017 Annual Meeting, over 88%89% of votes cast were in favor of the say-on-pay proposal. We view this as a positive endorsement of pay practice. Even in light ofNotwithstanding this strong support, we continue to monitor our pay alignment and seek ways to improve our compensation program, such asprogram. As a result, the additionCommittee has decided to restructure the long-term incentive plan for 2018 and beyond. More detail on the specifics of double trigger, anti-hedging, and anti-pledging policiesthat plan can be found in 2016.the Executive Performance Plans section below.

 

Elements of Compensation and Decisions

 

We target our total compensation in a way that is fair and appropriate considering market conditions, peer group comparisons, Company performance, individual performance, as well as our long-term strategic goals. We believe our compensation policies and practices appropriately balance risk against our desire to award competitive compensation and are unlikely to have an adverse effect on our Company. The elements of our compensation include base salary and short-term incentive awards, long-term incentive awards and long-term strategic plan awards under our EPP as highlighted below.

 

Base Salary

 

Our named executive officers’ base salaries are set to reflect a combination of factors, including but not limited to, level of responsibility, being competitive in the market, experience, skill-set, and individual performance, as well as the Company’s compensation philosophy and overall performance. We design our base salaries in significant part to retain and attract talented executives who can help drive long-term shareholder value. We believe we must keep our base salaries competitive, within the context of our conservative compensation culture, or risk losing executive talent because the markets in which we operate present current and potential executives with higher-paying alternatives.

 

The following summarizes the 20142016 and 20152017 salaries for the Company’s named executive officers:

 

Named Executive Officer2014 Base
Salary Rate
2015 Base Salary
Rate
%
Increase
2016 Base
Salary Rate
2017 Base
Salary Rate
%
Increase
Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
$500,000$500,000 0%$500,000$600,000 20%
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
$256,376$281,37610%$281,376$316,00012%
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.
Senior EVP, COO and General Counsel
$300,000$320,0007%

John P. Babcock

President- Private Wealth Management

$500,000$500,0000%
Eric H. Waser
EVP, Head of Commercial Banking
 (A)$290,000(A)
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr. (1)
Former Senior EVP, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel
$320,000$320,0000%
Robert A. Plante (2)
EVP, Chief Operating Officer
$-$300,0000%

John P. Babcock

Senior EVP, President- Private Wealth Management

$500,000$500,0000%

Lisa P. Chalkan

EVP Chief Credit Officer

$255,000$270,0006%

 23

(A) Mr. Waser joinedTable of Contents

(1)Mr. Caspersen resigned from the Company effective December 30, 2017.
(2)Mr. Plante was named EVP, Chief Operating Officer, effective March 2017.

For purposes of the Company in February 2015CD&A he is shown as COO throughout the CD&A section.

  

Mr. Caspersen’s increase brought his salary to just under the 50th percentile for the peer group. Mr. Carfora’s increase brought his salary to halfway between the 50th and the 75th percentile for the peer group.


Executive Performance Plans

 

As noted earlier, in 2015For 2017 compensation, the Committee continued the EPP, which was put in place in 2013. The EPP consistsconsisted of the following three components, as previously described:

 

·Short termShort-term incentive awards (“STI Awards”) that provideprovided an annual cash incentive opportunity based on achievement of pre-defined Company and individual performance goals;

 

·Long termLong-term incentive awards (“LTI Awards”) that provideprovided annual restricted stock awards, with three yearthree-year vesting, based on achievement of pre-defined Company and individual performance goals; and

 

·Long termLong-term Strategic Plan Award grants (“SPA Grants”) provideprovided restricted stock awards, with five yearfive-year vesting, that are intended to motivate executives to focus on the achievement of the Company’s high performing long-term strategic planning goals.

 

The amount of STI Awards, LTI Awards and SPA Grants earned by each named executive officer is dependent on the achievement of both Company goals and individual goals. The following chart depicts the potential for awards granted to each named executive officer under the EPP. The percentages referenced in the chart with respect to the STI Awards (Cash), LTI Awards (Restricted Stock) and the SPA Grants (Restricted Stock) refer to percentages of base salary. The SPA Grants in 2013 for the CEO, CFO and COO (at that time) and, in 2014 for the President of Private Wealth Management were one-time, intended to cover multiple periods of up to and including the year ended December 31, 2017, as discussed above.later in this document under “SPA Grants.” The EVP, Commercial BankingChief Credit Officer is eligible to receive an annual SPA Grant, in the set percentage noted below.below; such grant vests equally over a five-year period.

 

Goals & ObjectivesSTI Awards (Cash)LTI Awards (Stock)SPA GrantsGoals & ObjectivesSTI Awards (Cash)LTI Awards (Stock)SPA Grants
CompanyIndividualThresholdTargetMaxThresholdTargetMax(Stock)CompanyIndividualThresholdTargetMaxThresholdTargetMax(Stock)
Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief
Executive Officer
75%25%45%60%90%45%60%90%

0%

(250% granted
in 2013)

75%25%45%60%90%45%60%90%

0%

(250% granted
in 2013)

Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief
Financial Officer
75%25%30%40%60%30%40%60%

0%

(200% granted
in 2013)

75%25%30%40%60%30%40%60%

0%

(200% granted
in 2013)

Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.

Senior EVP, COO and
General Counsel

75%25%30%40%60%30%40%60%

0%

(200% granted|
in 2013)

Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.

Former Senior EVP,
Chief Strategy Officer
and General Counsel

75%25%30%40%60%30%40%60%

0%

(200% granted
in 2013)

Robert A. Plante

EVP, COO

50%50%23%30%45%23%30%45%

0%

 

John P. Babcock

President of Private
Wealth Management

50%50%30%40%60%30%40%60%

0%

(200% granted
in 2014)

50%50%30%40%60%30%40%60%

0%

(200% granted
in 2014)

Eric H. Waser

EVP, Commercial
Banking

50%50%23%30%45%23%30%45%

0%

(30% beginning
in 2016)

Lisa P. Chalkan

EVP, Chief Credit Officer

25%75%15%20%30%15%20%30%

20%

 

 

In formulating the EPP, the Committee also considered internal policies and relevant guidance from bank regulatory authorities whichthat direct the Committee to ensure that compensation incentive programs do not jeopardize the safety and soundness of the Company or the Bank. To that end, the Committee believes that the EPP and the Company’s other incentive compensation policies:

·appropriately balance risk and reward;
·are compatible with effective controls and procedures; and
·are supported by strong corporate governance, including active oversight by the Committee.

 24

While the Committee adopted the EPP in 2013, it uses the EPP as a general guideline and is not required to award compensation based strictly on the terms of the EPP. Accordingly, the Committee has the absolute discretion to make awards that are less than or greater than awards contemplated by the EPP. The Committee also may change, modify or discontinue the EPP at any time, including during the course of a particular year. The Committee may take into account the following factors:

20

·the safety and soundness of the Company;
·unexpected events that occur during the year;
·the Company’s performance relative to its peer group;
·regulatory changes; and
·extraordinary efforts in achieving financial and/or non-financial, but important strategic goals.

In 2017, the Committee approved an amended long-term portion of the EPP, to take effect in 2018. The new LTI plan will be split between performance-vested and time-vested shares. The time-vested portion of the plan provides annual restricted stock awards, with three-year ratable vesting, with the grant based on the discretion of the Committee (between approximately 55% - 165% of the predefined target level). The Committee will consider the prior year’s performance of the Company and the prior year’s performance of the individual among other things. The performance-vested shares will be granted based on the discretion of the Committee (between approximately 55% - 165% of the predefined target level), and will vest at the conclusion of a three-year performance period based on EPS growth relative to peers. This grant is intended to motivate executives to focus on the achievement of the Company’s high performing long-term strategic planning goals and to further align Company executives with shareholders.

2018 LTI Plan% of GrantPerformance MetricVesting LengthVesting TypePerformance Condition# of shares vested
CEO & SEVPsEVPs
Time-Vested
Shares
50%75%Discretionary3 yearsRatableAward is granted at a discretionary
level from approximately 55% of target to 165%
of target. The Committee will
consider prior year performance of
the company and the individual,
among other things.
100% of shares granted
Performance-
Vested
Shares
50%25%3-yr relative
EPS Growth
3 yearsCliffAward is granted at a discretionary
level from approximately 55% of target to 165%
of target. The Committee will
consider prior year performance of
the Company and the individual,
among other things.
ThresholdTargetMaximum
25th
percentile
of peer
EPS
growth =
approximately
55% of
grant
50th
percentile
of peer
EPS
growth =
100% of
grant
75th
percentile
of peer
EPS
growth =
approximately
165% of
grant

Due to the nature of this plan change, no equity under the EPP was granted for the CEO and SEVPs for performance in 2017. The awards made in 2017 were granted based upon 2016 performance, while the 2018 award will be granted based on 2018-2020 performance. In an effort to keep executives aligned with Company performance throughout this 2017 transition year, the Committee granted a transition award to executives in 2017, which vests ratably over five years.

 25

EPP Company Performance

The following table shows the income targets at various levels compared to the actual performance (as adjusted) of the Company and the corresponding Company performance achievement as it relates to payouts for the annual STI (cash) and LTI (restricted stock) awards in the EPP.

 

Threshold

(85% of Budget)

2015

Budget

Max

(110% of Budget)

2015 as
Adjusted

Company Performance

 

2015 as % of Budget

Threshold

(85% of Budget)

Target

2017

Budget

Max

(110% of Budget)

2017 Actual

Company Performance

2017 as % of Budget

Pretax Net Income26.9531.7034.8734.64109%
Pretax Income40.9748.2053.0254.31113%
Net Income16.1719.0220.9221.53113%25.4129.8932.8836.50122%
 Average111% - Maximum Average118% (= Max)

 

The Committee also reviewed the Company’s earnings per share (“EPS”), return on average assets (“ROAA”), return on average equity (“ROAE”), revenue growth and asset quality. After reviewing these measures, the Committee concluded Company performance was achieved at the maximum level for 2015,2017, as calculated.

Short Term Incentive Awards (Cash)

We paid short term incentive awards (cash) to our named executive officers based on 20152017 Company performance and 20152017 individual performance. As fully described previously, Company performance for 20152017 was rated at maximum.the maximum level. Individual 20152017 performance was rated at targetthe maximum level for all NEOs.the CEO and at maximum for each of the other four named executive officers that received an award. The individual performance of those other four named executive officers was determined by the CEO and agreed to by the Compensation Committee. Among other things, the CEO considered performance relative to: specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in the budget, wherever applicable; specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in prior year results, wherever applicable; and various goals and targets previously set by the CEO and the individual at the beginning of the fiscal year, including personal accountability for critical performance with respect to standard banking industry company metrics, such as deposit growth, loan growth, credit quality, efficiency ratio, and other such goals. The use of individual goals represents the clear assignment by the Compensation Committee of direct personal accountability for specific financial, organizational, operational and risk management objectives, the attainment of which contribute significantly to the Company’s performance. The Committee awarded the short termshort-term incentives (cash) detailed below.

 

Named Executive OfficerShort Term
Incentive Award
(Cash) Paid in
December 2015
and March 2016

 

% of
Base
Salary

Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
$309,375*62%
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
$116,068*41%
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.
Senior EVP, COO and General Counsel
$132,000*41%
John P. Babcock
President of Private Wealth Management
$250,00050%
Eric H. Waser
EVP, Commercial Banking
$108,75038%

*Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, and Caspersen’s STI (cash) awards were calculated at $412,500, $154,757, and $176,000, respectively. These calculated amounts were then discounted by 25% at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Named Executive OfficerShort Term
Incentive Award
(Cash) Paid for
2017

 

% of
Base
Salary

Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
$540,00090%
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
$189,60060%
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.
Former Senior EVP, Chief Strategy Officer and
General Counsel
$--
Robert A. Plante
EVP and COO
$135,00045%
John P. Babcock
President of Private Wealth Management
$300,00060%
Lisa P. Chalkan
EVP, Chief Credit Officer
$100,00037%

 

 

Long Term Incentive Awards (Restricted Stock)

 

Our long termlong-term incentive awards (restricted stock)(generally restricted stock units) are designed to focus our executives on long-term performance and shareholder value. We granted long term incentive awards (restricted stock)(generally restricted stock units) to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Caspersen, Babcock, and BabcockMs. Chalkan in

21

March 2015.2017. These awards were based on 20142016 Company performance and 20142016 individual performance. Company performance for 20142016 was atmaximum with the 2014 Budget.maximum level. Individual performance was eitherrated at themaximum level for the CEO and at maximum or target level for the other named executive officers for 2016. The individual performance of those other four named executive officers was determined by the CEO and agreed to by the Compensation Committee. Among other things, the CEO considered performance relative to: specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in the budget, wherever applicable; specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in prior year results, wherever applicable; and various goals and targets previously set by the CEO and the individual attarget level. These grants vest the beginning of the fiscal year, including personal accountability for critical performance with respect to standard banking industry company metrics, such as deposit growth, loan growth, credit quality, efficiency ratio, and other such goals. The use of individual goals represents the clear assignment by the Compensation Committee of direct personal accountability for specific financial, organizational, operational and risk management objectives, the attainment of which contribute significantly to the Company’s performance. See the discussion in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “2016 Financial Highlights and Company Performance” and “2016 CEO Compensation Decisions” included in our proxy statement filed on March 17, 2017 for information regarding Company and individual performance for 2016. This grant vests in equal increments over three years.

 

 26

The following table shows the income targets at various levels compared to the actual 2016 performance of the Company and the corresponding Company performance achievement as it relates to payouts for the annual LTI (restricted stock) awards.

 

Threshold

(85% of Budget)

Target

2016

Budget

Max

(110% of 2015 as considered for compensation determination )

2016 Actual

Company Performance

2016 as % of Budget

Company Performance

2016 as a %

of 2015 as considered for compensation determination

Pretax  Income27.3232.1438.1042.74133%123%
Net Income16.9419.9323.6826.48133%123%
    Average133%123%(= Max)

After reviewing these measures, the Committee concluded Company performance was achieved at the maximum level for 2017, as calculated. The Committee concluded Company performance was achieved at maximum for 2016, as calculated. The following table sets forth the awards of restricted stock granted in March 20152017 based on 20142016 performance to our named executive officers.

 

Named Executive OfficerLong Term Incentive Award
(Restricted Stock) Granted
March 2015 (in Dollars)
Long Term Incentive Award
(Restricted Stock) Granted
March 2015 (in Shares)
% of
Base
Salary
Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
$449,979 21,44890%
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
$153,825 7,33255%
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.
Senior EVP, COO and General Counsel
$164,987 7,86452%
John P. Babcock
President of Private Wealth Management
$249,998 (A) 11,916 (A)50%
Eric H. Waser
EVP, Commercial Banking
$(B) (B)(B)

(A) Mr. Babcock also received
Named Executive OfficerLong Term Incentive Award
(Restricted Stock) Granted
March 2017 (in Dollars) (1)
Long Term Incentive Award
(Restricted Stock) Granted
March 2017 (in Shares)
% of
Base
Salary
Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
$449,997 14,96075%
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
$168,809 5,61253%
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.
Senior EVP, Chief Strategy Officer and
General Counsel
$175,998 5,85155%
Robert A. Plante
EVP and COO
$- --
John P. Babcock
President of Private Wealth Management
$249,995 8,31150%
Lisa P. Chalkan
EVP, Chief Credit Officer
$127,479 4,23847%
(1)Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Caspersen, and Babcock LTI (stock) awards were calculated at $450,000, $168,826, $176,000, and $250,000 respectively (all grants were rounded down slightly to convert to whole shares). These vest over three years.
Ms. Chalkan’s restricted stock grant includes a LTI stock award calculated at $76,500 (2,543 shares) vesting over three years and a second grant with a fair value of $99,991 (4,401 shares) in December 2015 for his efforts associated with the successful merger with and integration of Wealth Management Consultants.

(B) Mr. Waser joined the Company in February 2015, and in connection with his offer letter and hiring, Mr. Waser was granted $199,981 (9,532 shares) of restricted stock which vests evenly over three years.

Strategic Plan Award (SPA) calculated at $51,000 (1,695 shares) vesting over five years.

SPA Grants

 

As described previously, SPA Grantsgrants of restricted stock arehave been intended to motivate executives to focus on the achievement of the Company’s high performing long-term strategic planning goals. For the CEO, CFO, COO, and President of Private Wealth Management the grant iswas not an annual grant and iswas expected to cover multiple years up to and including the year ended December 31, 2017:2017. The CEO COO and CFO received these grants in 2013. The President of Private Wealth Management received his grant in 2014 when he joined the Company. These SPA grants arewere subject to vesting as follows: 50% of the grant vests in equal increments over a five yearfive-year period and the remaining 50% vestswould have vested only if four of

 27

five pre-determined high performing annual targets arewere met for an annual period of time. If the high performing targets are not mettime, by year end 2017,2017. Since four of the stock isfive targets were not met, this portion of the grant will be forfeited. The high performing targets arewere as follows:

 

·ROAA of one percent;
·ROAE of 12 percent;
·revenue growth of 15 percent;
·EPS growth of 15 percentpercent: and
·non-performingnonperforming assets to total assets of less than 1.5 percent of assets.

 

Based on current projections,While we attained the performance contingent portion of these awards are unlikely to vest, as, due to several factors, most notably the continued low interest raterevenue growth target, EPS growth target, and flat net interest spread environment,nonperforming asset target, we believe we willdid not be able to generate a one percent ROAA or a 12 percent ROAE by 2017.in 2017, thus only attaining three of the five high performance targets (as opposed to the four required for performance-based vesting). In December 2015, we reversed the accumulated restricted stock expense that had been amortized since grant date.date, and have not accrued any expense since.

As noted in the table above, the EVP, Chief Credit Officer received an annual SPA grant in March 2017 with a value of 20 percent of her base salary. Such grant time vests equally over a five-year period.

Transition Grants

As described earlier, the CEO and SEVPs received a transitional award at the beginning of 2017 which represents 1/6th of the 2018 LTI plan target opportunity. These shares vest over five years.

Named Executive OfficerTransition Award (Restricted
Stock) Granted March 2017
(in Dollars) (1)
Transition Award (Restricted
Stock) Granted March 2017
(in Shares)
% of
Base
Salary
Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
$99,986 3,32417%
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
$42,202 1,40213%
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.
Former Senior EVP, Chief Strategy Officer
and General Counsel
$47,978 1,59515%
Robert A. Plante
EVP and COO
$- --
John P. Babcock
President of Private Wealth Management
$74,989 2,49315%
Lisa P. Chalkan
EVP, Chief Credit Officer
$- --
(1)Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Caspersen, and Babcock LTI (stock) awards were calculated at $100,000, $42,206, $48,000, and $75,000 respectively. These vest over three years (all grants were rounded down slightly to convert to whole shares).

Deferred Compensation Retention Award

In 2017, Peapack instituted a retention tool for the top three executives (Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Carfora and Mr. Babcock). The Deferred Compensation Retention Award (“DCRA”) is a cash-based retention award with contributions made to the plan over a five-year period. Beginning with the third quarter of 2017, quarterly contributions of $50,000 for Mr. Kennedy and $25,000 for the other two executives will be made assuming the executive is employed and the Company has generated EPS of at least 60% of budget for the previous 12 months. Vesting occurs ratably over three years. The account balance receives interest crediting based on the Wall Street Journal prime rate, provided that the rate shall not exceed 7.5%.

 28

Named Executive Officer2017 ContributionAnnualized Contribution
Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
$ $100,000 $200,000
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
$ $50,000  $100,000
Robert A. Plante
EVP and COO
$- -
John P. Babcock
President of Private Wealth Management
$ $50,000  $100,000
Lisa P. Chalkan
EVP, Chief Credit Officer
$- -

The Committee determined a retention award based in cash instead of stock was appropriate because of the substantial stock ownership of the top executives. The current equity ownership of these executives is well in excess of the Company’s ownership guidelines.

 

Benefits/Other Compensation


The Company provides bank-sponsored insurance and retirement benefit plans tofor our named executive officers. The benefit packages are designed to assist named executive officers in providing for their financial security.

 

The Company provides retirement benefits to named executive officers through a combination of plans that are qualified and nonqualified under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company has established a qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Code, covering substantially all salaried employees over the age of twenty-one21 with at least twelve months of service and whose participation is not prohibited by the 401(k) plan.Plan. Under the savings portion of the 401(k) plan,Plan, employees may contribute up to 15% of their base pay (up to a maximum of $18,000 in2015) to their elective account via payroll withholding.in 2017). Annually, the Company makes a matching contribution equal to 50% of the first 6% of an employee’s salary, plus up to an additional 3% employer contribution for all employees, on a discretionary basis. The Committee believes that employees require 401(k) plans, and that to attract and retain able employees the Company must offer these benefits to its employees, including its named executive officers.

 

The named executive officers receive the same employer-provided health and welfare insurance package coveringavailable to all full-time employees, which includes health, dental, vision, disability and basic group life insurance.

 

The Company has also purchased bank owned life insurance and entered into a split-dollar plan with the named executive officers (except for Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Babcock, and Mr. Waser) and certain other employees to provide current and post-employment life insurance in an amount whichthat ranges from $25,000 to 2.5 times the participant’s annual base salary. A life insurance benefit of 2.5 times a named executive officer’s annual base salary vests if prior to the termination of employment there is a change in control or the named executive officer becomes disabled. A benefit of 2.5 times the named executive officer’s salary is paid if the participant dies while employed by the Company. Named executive officers are also entitled to a vested post-employment life insurance benefit based on years of service and age as of the date of termination of employment. This vested benefit ranges from a minimum of 1.0 times base annual salary at age 50 to a maximum of 2.5 times annual base salary at age 60, in each case after completion of 15 years of service. There is a minimum benefit of $25,000 if the participant does not reach the vesting levels. Bank ownedBank-owned life insurance assists the Company in offsetting the rising costs of employee benefits by providing the Company with current income prior to the death of an insured, and a lump-sum payment upon the death of an insured. The Company owns the cash surrender value of the policies and records the increases in the cash surrender value as income. Upon the death of an insured the Company will receive cash equal to the cash surrender value of the policy and excess life insurance over the amount paid to the insured’s beneficiary. The Committee believes that bank ownedbank-owned life insurance is primarily a good investment for the Company, and secondarily a supplementary life insurance benefit for many of our officers, including our named executive officers.

 

Change in Control Agreements

 

Upon his hire in February 2015, we entered into a change in control agreement with Mr. Waser. In December 2013 we entered into a change in control agreement with Mr. Kennedy, and amendedWe maintain individual change in control agreements with Mr.Casperson,Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Carfora, Mr. Plante, Mr. Babcock and Mr. Carfora. In 2014 we entered into a change in control agreement with Mr. Babcock. With the exception of Mr. Waser’s agreement, the terms of each of these agreements are substantially the same among the named executive officers.Ms. Chalkan. The agreements each provide for the employment of the named executive officer for a period of three yearsContract Period (defined in the table below) commencing on the day prior to a change in control (as defined in the agreement). During the three year period in which the agreement is in effect,Contract

 29

Period, the executives will each be provided with (i)(1) the same base salary that existed prior to the change in control, (ii)(2) an opportunity for a bonus equal to at least the bonus opportunity in effect immediately prior to the change in control, and (iii)(3) benefits and perquisites at levels generally available to the executive prior to the change in control. If, during such three-year period,the Contract Period, the executive resigns for good reason (as defined in the agreement) or is terminated other than for cause (as defined in the agreement) hehe/she will be entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to threethe multiple defined in the table below times hishis/her then base salary and the greater of his average bonus amount for the three preceding fiscal years and the bonus paid during the most recent fiscal year. For Mr. Waser, upon a resignation for good reason or a termination for other than cause, he will be entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to two times his then base salary and the greater of hishis/her average bonus amount for the three preceding fiscal years and the bonus paid during the most recent fiscal year. Each named executive officer will also be entitled to receive payments from the Company equal to the costs of COBRA continuation lifeof health insurance coverage for 18 monthsa period defined in the table below following termination of employment. In the event that the total paymentsbenefits payable under the agreements and other arrangements following a change in control would require the executive to pay an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, then the total payments paid to the executive will be the greater of (i)(1) a reduced payment equal to the amount whichthat would not result in the payment of an excess parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and an excise tax by the executive under Section 4999, and (ii)(2) a payment equal to the greatest after tax amount payable to the executive after taking into account any excise tax imposed under Section 4999. The agreements also prohibit the executives from competing against the Company and soliciting the Company’s customers and employees for a one yearone-year period following termination of employment. The Committee feels these agreements are necessary to encourage our named executive officers to approach an advantageous merger or acquisition transaction without regard to immediate loss of salary and benefits. The Committee also believes that, given the high degree of consolidation within the banking business, these agreements are necessary to retain and attract talented named executive officers.


Named Executive OfficerContract PeriodChange-in-Control and
Termination Severance
Multiple
Change-in-Control and
Termination Health
Care Continuation
Douglas L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
3 years3 times3 years
Jeffrey J. Carfora
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer
3 years3 times3 years
Robert A. Plante
EVP and COO
2 years2 times2 years
John P. Babcock
President of Private Wealth Management
3 years3 times3 years
Lisa P. Chalkan
EVP, Chief Credit Officer
3 years1.5 times1.5 years

Employment Contracts

 

We are also a party to employment agreements that give the named executive officers certain benefits. These agreements provide, among other things, for eligibility for (i)(1) participation during the employment term in all compensation and employee benefits plans for which any salaried employees of the Company are eligible, (ii)(2) an annual base salary and (iii) discretionary(3) bonus payments with respect to each calendar year.year within the Committee’s discretion. Under these agreements, if a named executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause (at any time preceding the date prior to a change in control), the Company shall pay the executive’s base salary for a period equal to two years from the effective date of such termination. In the event that the Company terminates a named executive officer’s employment for cause or in the event of the named executive officer’s retirement, permanent disability or death, the Company shall pay the named executive officer any earned but unpaid base salary as of the date of termination of employment. The employment agreements also include certain non-compete and non-solicitation provisions. The Committee believes the Company would be unable to retain and attract talented senior executives without employment agreements, which are customary in the Company’s competitive market.market, are important in order to retain and attract talented senior executives.

Separation and Release with Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.

Mr. Caspersen’s resigned as Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel and from the Board of Directors of the Bank and the Company, effective December 30, 2017. In consideration of releasing all claims against the Company and the Bank, the Company will pay Mr. Caspersen severance of $640,000 over a two-year period, paid him a separation payment for 2017 of $176,000, fully vested 19,356 shares of restricted stock, which would have vested over the next several years, and provided other perquisites that were consistent with other executives at his level.


 30

Income Tax Considerations

 

Our federal income tax deduction for non-performance basedexecutive compensation paid to certain of our named executive officers listed in the summary compensation table, with the exception of the executive listed as a result of serving as the principal financial officer, is limited by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code to $1 million annually. Compensation paid to any of them exceeding $1 million is non-deductible for federal income tax purposes unless it is “performance based,“qualified performance-based compensation,” as defined in Section 162(m), meaning generally, that the compensation is based on the executive’s achieving pre-established objective performance goals and paid under a plan pre-approved by our shareholders.

 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) enacted on December 22, 2017 significantly modified Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Tax Act eliminated the “qualified performance-based compensation” exception to the deductibility limitation under Section 162(m) for tax years commencing after December 31, 2017. The Tax Act provides “grandfathered” treatment for qualified performance-based compensation in excess of $1 million that meets the requirements of Section 162(m), is payable pursuant a written binding contract in effect as of November 2, 2017 and is not modified in any material respect. In addition, the Tax Act expands the definition of “covered employee” to include the principal financial officer as well as any employee who has been designated a covered employee for any fiscal year beginning after December 31, 2016.

In 2017 and in prior years, the Committee monitors, and will continue to monitor,monitored the effect of Section 162(m) on the deductibility of the Company’s compensation. The Committee weighsweighed the benefits of full deductibility with the other objectives of the executive compensation program and, accordingly, may from time to time payhave paid compensation subject to the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m). A number of requirements must be met for particular compensation to qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m), so there can be no assurance that the incentive compensation awarded will be fully deductible in all circumstances.

 

The Committee has historically attempted to structure its compensation arrangements to achieve deductibility under Section 162(m), unless the benefit of such deductibility is considered by the Committee to be outweighed by the need for flexibility or the attainment of other objectives. As was the case prior to the enactment of the Tax Act, the Committee will continue to monitor issues concerning the deductibility of executive compensation. Since corporate objectives may not always be consistent with the requirements for tax deductibility, the Committee is prepared, when it deems appropriate, to enter into compensation arrangements under which payments will not be deductible under Section 162(m). Thus, deductibility will be one of many factors considered by the Committee in designing our executive compensation program.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and based on such review and discussions the Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee

Ofof the Board of Directors

 

F. Duffield Meyercord, ChairmanChair

Anthony J. Consi, II

Philip W. Smith, III

Tony Spinelli

 

 

25 31

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

20152017 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth compensation information for Peapack-Gladstone’s named executive officers. For a summary of the Committee’s decisions on compensation awarded to our named executive officers in 2017, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

  Name and
   Principal
   Position

 

 

Year

 

 

  Salary

  ($)

 

 

  Bonus

  ($)

 

  Stock Awards
  ($)(1)

   Incentive
   Compensation
   Non-Equity

   ($)

   All Other
   Compensation
   ($)(2)

 

 

  Total

  ($)

Douglas L. Kennedy

President &
CEO of
Peapack-
Gladstone and
the Bank

2015

2014

2013

 

500,000

500,000

500,000

 

--

112,500

0

 

449,979

337,493

1,499,980

 

309,375

450,000

225,000

 

29,091

42,056

21.416

 

1,288,445

1,442,049

2,246,396

 

Jeffrey J.

Carfora

Senior
Executive Vice
President and
CFO of
Peapack-
Gladstone and
the Bank

2015

2014

2013

 

281,376

256,376

256,376

 

--

38,456

0

 

153,825

115,360

572,099

 

116,068

153,826

76,913

 

23,779

35,629

25,861

 

575,048

599,647

931,249

 

Finn M. W.
Caspersen, Jr.

Senior
Executive Vice
President,
Chief
Operating
Officer and
General
Counsel of
Peapack-
Gladstone and
the Bank

2015

2014

2013

 

320,000

300,000

300,000

 

--

45,000

0

 

164,986

135,005

664,635

 

132,000

165,000

90,000

 

27,606

33,774

44,058

 

644,592

678,779

1,098,693

 

John P.
Babcock

Senior
Executive Vice
President of
Peapack-
Gladstone and
President of
Private Wealth
Management

2015

2014

500,000

394,231

--

500,000

350,000

1,200,014

250,000

250,000

$23,100

17,433

1,123,100

2,361,678

Eric H. Waser

Executive Vice
President of
Peapack-
Gladstone and
the Bank -
Head of
Commercial
Banking (3)

2015

 

 

245,385

 

--

 

199,981

 

108,750

 

20,205

 

 

574,321

 

Name and Principal Position Year Salary
 ($)
 Stock Awards
($)(1)
 Incentive
Compensation
Non-Equity
 ($)(2)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
 Total
($)
Douglas L. Kennedy  2017   573,077   549,983   540,000   132,541   1,795,601 
President & CEO of Peapack-  2016   500,000   350,614   450,000   34,007   1,334,621 
Gladstone and the Bank  2015   500,000   449,979   309,375   29,091   1,288,445 
Jeffrey J. Carfora  2017   306,678   211,011   189,600   67,792   775,081 
Senior Executive Vice President  2016   281,376   131,541   168,600   16,702   598,219 
and CFO of Peapack-Gladstone
and the Bank
  2015   281,376   153,825   116,068   16,579   567,848 
Finn M. W. Caspersen, Jr.  2017   320,000   901,822      227,719   1,449,541 
Former Senior Executive Vice  2016   320,000   149,587   176,000   27,661   673,248 
President, Chief Strategy Officer
and General Counsel of
Peapack-Gladstone and the
Bank (4)
  2015   320,000   164,986   132,000   27,606   644,592 
Robert A. Plante  2017   236,538      135,000      371,538 
Executive Vice President and                        
Chief Operating Officer of
Peapack-Gladstone and the
Bank (5)
                        
John P. Babcock  2017   500,000   324,984   300,000   68,967   1,193,951 
Senior Executive Vice President  2016   500,000   249,990   250,000   17,806   1,017,796 
of Peapack-Gladstone and
President of Private Wealth
Managemen
  2015   500,000   350,000   250,000   15,900   1,115,900 
Lisa P. Chalkan  2017   256,153   127,479   100,000   16,200   499,832 
Executive Vice President and
Chief Credit Officerof Peapack-
Gladstone and the Bank  (6)
                        

 

(1)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards in accordance with ASC 718, see718. See Note 12 – Stock-Based Compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152017 for additional information on the valuation methodology. These awards were granted under our 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, which

26

provides forDue to the awardresignation of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,Mr. Caspersen, certain restricted stock or restrictedawards/units were accelerated for vesting purposes and are included in stock units to eligible employees, including our named executive officers.awards along with the awards granted in 2017. The plan provides that grants to eligible employees are determined and approved bytotal value of shares accelerated on the Compensation Committee.vesting date totaled $677,847.
(2)Amounts represent short-term incentive awards (cash) paid in the first quarter of 2018 under our EPP based on 2017 performance achievement.

 32

(3)The following table itemizes the compensation in this column:column. The table excludes perquisites that did not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate for each named executive officer.
Name Auto
Allowance
 Company
Contributions to
401(k)
 BOLI
Premiums
Douglas L. Kennedy $13,191  $15,900  $ 
Jeffrey J. Carfora  7,200   15,900   679 
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.  11,163   15,900   543 
John P. Babcock  7,200   15,900    
Eric H. Waser  6,000   14,205    

Name Company
Auto
 Company
Contributions to
401(k)
 Deferred
Retention
Award Plan (A)
 Separation
Payment
 BOLI
Premiums
Douglas L. Kennedy $12,464  $16,200  $101,388  $  $2,489 
Jeffrey J. Carfora   ─    16,200   50,694    ─    898 
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.  11,163   16,200    ─    199,726   630 
Robert A. Plante   ─     ─     ─     ─     ─  
John P. Babcock   ─    16,200   50,694    ─    2,073 
Lisa P. Chalkan   ─    16,200    ─     ─     ─  

(A) This is a defined contribution plan with annual contributions to be made of $200,000 for Mr. Kennedy and $100,000 for Messrs. Carfora and Babcock for a period of five years. All contributions are to be made in cash. The effective date of the Plan was August 2017. The account balance receives interest based on the Wall Street Journal prime rate.

 

(3)(4)Mr. WaserCaspersen resigned from the Company, effective December 30, 2017.
(5)Mr. Plante joined the Company in February 2015.March 2017.
(6)Ms. Chalkan was added as a named executive officer in 2017.

 

20152017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name Grant Date All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of
Stocks or Units (#) (1)
 Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock and
Option Awards
Douglas L. Kennedy 3/11/2015  21,448  $449,979 
Jeffrey J. Carfora 3/11/2015  7,332   153,825 
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr. 3/11/2015  7,864   164,987 
John P. Babcock 3/11/2015  11,916   249,998 
  12/4/2015  4,401   99,991 
Eric H. Waser 3/11/2015  9,532   199,981 

The following tables set forth additional detail regarding 2017 incentive compensation non-equity (cash) and stock award grants under the Executive Performance Plan.

  Estimated Payouts Under the Short Term
(Cash) Incentive Plan
  
Name Threshold ($) Target ($) Maximum
($)
 Actual Cash
Payments ($)
Douglas L. Kennedy $270,000  $360,000  $540,000  $540,000 
Jeffrey J. Carfora  94,800   126,400   189,600   189,600 
Finn M. W. Caspersen, Jr.  76,000   128,000   192,000    
Robert A. Plante  69,000   90,000   135,000   135,000 
John P. Babcock  150,000   200,000   300,000   300,000 
Lisa P. Chalkan  40,500   54,000   100,000   100,000 

  Estimated Payouts Under the Long Term
(Stock) Incentive Plan
   All Other Stock
Awards: Number of
 Grant Date Fair
      Maximum   Shares of Stocks or Value of Stock
Name Threshold ($) Target ($) ($) Grant Date Units (#) Awards (1) (2)
Douglas L. Kennedy $225,000  $300,000  $450,000   3/11/2017   14,960  $449,997 
Jeffrey J. Carfora  84,413   112,550   168,826   3/11/2017   5,612   168,809 
Finn M. W. Caspersen, Jr.  96,000   128,000   192,000   3/11/2017   5,851   175,998 
Robert A. Plante                  
John P. Babcock  150,000   200,000   300,000   3/11/2017   8,311   249,995 
Lisa P. Chalkan  38,250   51,000   76,500   3/11/2017   2,543   76,493 

  

(1)Represents restrictedExcludes “transitional” stock awards granted under the 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. For Messrs.(described previously) as follows:
Mr. Kennedy -$99,986; 3,324 shares
Mr. Carfora Caspersen and Babcock, these awards vest in three equal annual installments commencing with the first anniversary-$42,202; 1,402 shares
Mr. Caspersen-$47,978; 1,595 shares
Mr. Babcock-$74,989; 2,493 shares
(2)Excludes Strategic Plan award grant of the grant date subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. For Mr. Waser, this represents his sign-on grant, which vests in five equal annual installments commencing with the first anniversary of the grant date subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The restricted$50,986; 1,695 shares have the right to vote and receive dividends.for Ms. Chalkan

2733 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20152017 Fiscal Year-End

The following table represents stock options and stock awards outstanding for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2015.2017. The market value of shares that have not vested is calculated using our closing market price of $35.02 as of December 29, 2017. There were no outstanding options for any of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2017.

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards Stock Awards
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
��Option
Exercise
Price
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Grant Date Number of
Shares That
Have Not
Vested
 Market
Value of
Shares That
Have Not
Vested
 Grant Date Number of
Shares
That Have
Not
Vested
 Market
Value of
Shares That
Have Not
Vested
Douglas L. Kennedy                  1/2/2013   6,812 (3)  $140,463  1/2/2013  3,406 (1) $119,278 
 12/4/2013  7,099 (1)  248,607 
 12/4/2013  35,491 (2)  1,242,895 
                  12/4/2013   21,295 (3)   439,103  3/11/2015  7,150 (3)  250,393 
                  12/4/2013   35,491 (4)   731,824  3/11/2016  13,782 (3)  482,646 
                  3/11/2014   11,614 (5)   239,481  3/11/2017  14,960 (3)  523,899 
                  3/11/2015   21,448 (5)   442,258  3/11/2017  3,324 (1)  116,406 
Jeffrey J. Carfora                  1/3/2012   980 (6)  $20,208  12/4/2013  14,559 (2) $509,856 
                  3/1/2013   1,392 (5)   28,703  12/4/2013  2,912 (1)  101,978 
                  12/4/2013   8,735 (3)   180,116  3/11/2015  2,444 (3)  85,589 
                  12/4/2013   14,558 (4)   300,207  3/11/2016  5,171 (3)  181,088 
                  3/11/2014   3,970 (5)   81,861  3/11/2017  5,612 (3)  196,532 
                  3/11/2015   7,332 (5)   151,186  3/11/2017  1,403 (1)  49,133 
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.  2,100 (1)      26.76   1/3/2017                     $ 
Robert A. Plante        $ 
John P. Babcock 3/11/2014  10,273 (1) $359,760 
  3,150 (2)      23.40   1/2/2018              3/11/2014  25,681 (2)  899,349 
                  1/3/2012   1,003 (6)  $20,682  3/11/2015  3,972 (3)  139,099 
                  3/1/2013   1,516 (5)   31,260  12/4/2015  1,467 (3)  51,374 
                  12/4/2013   10,222 (3)   210,778  3/11/2016  9,827 (3)  344,142 
                  12/4/2013   17,036 (4)   351,282  3/11/2017  8,311 (3)  291,051 
                  3/11/2014   4,646 (5)   95,801  3/11/2017  2,493 (1)  87,305 
                  3/11/2015   7,864 (5)   162,156 
John P. Babcock                  3/11/2014   6,883 (5)  $141,927 
Lisa P. Chalkan 5/19/2015  2,025 (3) $70,915 
                  3/11/2014   20,545 (3)   423,638  3/11/2016  1,741 (3)  60,970 
                  3/11/2014   25,681 (4)   529,542  3/11/2016  2,089 (1)  73,157 
                  3/11/2015   11,916 (5)   245,708 
                  12/4/2015   4,401 (5)   90,749 
Eric H. Waser                  3/11/2015   9,532 (3)  $196,550 

 

(1)Stock options granted on January 3, 2007, vest at a rate of 20% per year for five years and are exercisable not earlier than one year after the date of the grant, at a price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant.
(2)Stock options granted on January 2, 2008, vest at a rate of 20% per year for five years and are exercisable not earlier than one year after the date of the grant, at a price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant.
(3)The restricted stock vests in five equal annual installments 20%beginning on eachthe first installments anniversary of issuance and only if the executive continues to serve as an executive at such applicable vesting date. Upon termination of employment by reason of death, disability or retirement, or upon a Changechange in Control,control, all shares immediately vest.
(4)(2)Performance-based restricted stock which will cliff vest in March following the fiscal year in which the Company meets four out of five performance measures as described under “Strategic Plan Award (SPA) Grants” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. If the Company does not meet four of the five high-performance measures in 2014, 2015, 2016 or 2017, the shares will be forfeited. As discussed previously, these awards are unlikely towill not vest. Upon termination of employment by reason of death, disability or upon a Change in Control, all shares immediately vest, and upon retirement, as defined in the award agreement, the shares will remain outstanding until they either vest or are forfeited in accordance with their terms.

2834 

(5)(3)The restricted stock vests in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of issuance and only if the executive continues to serve as an executive at such applicable vesting date. Upon termination of employment by reason of death, disability or retirement, or upon a Changechange in Control, all shares immediately vest.
(6)The restricted stock vests in four installments: 40% on the second anniversary of issuance and 20% each on the next three annual anniversaries, and only if the executive continues to serve as an executive at such applicable vesting date. Upon termination of employment by reason of death, disability or retirement, or upon a Change in Control,control, all shares immediately vest.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

The following table represents the options exercises and the vesting of restricted stock during 2015.2017. There were no stock options exercised by any named executive officers in 2017.

  Option Awards Stock Awards
  Number of Shares   Number of Shares  
  Acquired on Value Realized Acquired on Value Realized
  Exercise On Exercise Vesting On Vesting
Name (#) ($) (#) ($)
Douglas L. Kennedy    19,630  $418,645 
Jeffrey J. Carfora    11,263   233,029 
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr    12,251   254,649 
John P. Babcock    8,525   180,560 
Eric H. Waser        

 

  Stock Awards
  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
 Value Realized
On Vesting (1)
Name (#) ($)
Douglas L. Kennedy  30,438  $953,648 
Jeffrey J. Carfora  10,936   344,388 
Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr. (2)  31,685   1,066,623 
Robert A. Plante      
John P. Babcock  18,981   578,254 
Lisa P. Chalkan  3,417   101,589 

(1)The value realized upon vesting is equal to the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of vesting multiplied by the number of shares acquired. In each case, the amount reported is the aggregate of shares vesting from more than one grant of restricted stock.
(2)Included in Mr. Caspersen’s vesting were 19,356 restricted stock awards/units that were accelerated for vesting purposes.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information:

For fiscal 2017, our last completed fiscal year:

§The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our Company was $61,415; and
§The annual total compensation of Mr. Kennedy, our Chief Executive Officer, was $1,795,601.

Based on this information, the ratio for 2017 of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is 29 to 1.

We completed the following steps to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees and to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and CEO:

1.As of December 31, 2017, our employee population consisted of approximately 471 individuals, including any full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employees employed on that date.
2.To find the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, we used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for fiscal 2017. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of full-time and part-time permanent employees who were employed on December 31, 2017, but did not work for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part time employees.

35 

3.We identified an initial median employee using this compensation measure and methodology, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation. We identified an anomaly with this employee’s 2017 compensation that would have significantly impacted our pay ratio and therefore substituted this employee with an adjacent employee with substantially similar W-2 compensation to that of the original identified employee.
4.After identifying the median employee, we added together all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2017 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $61,415.
5.With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2017 Summary Compensation Table.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank have entered into employment agreements with the named executive officers, which set forth the terms of employment of the officers and provide for benefits in the event of termination without “cause.” Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank have also entered into change in control agreements with the named executive officers, each of which provide for benefits in the event a termination without “cause” or for “good reason” during a specified period following a merger or acquisition of Peapack-Gladstone. A detailed description of the employment agreements and change-in-control agreements may be found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy under “Employment Contracts” and “Change Inin Control Agreements.”

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

 

The following table shows the potential payments under each named executive officer’s change-in-control or employment agreement if he or she had terminated employment with the BankCompany effective December 31, 2015,2017, under each of the following retirement or termination circumstances: (i)(1) death or disability; (ii)(2) voluntary resignation or dismissal for cause; (iii)(3) retirement; (iv)(4) dismissal without cause; and (v)(5) dismissal without cause or resignation for good reason following a change-in-control of Peapack-Gladstone on December 31, 2015.Peapack-Gladstone. These payments are considered estimates as of specific dates as they contain some assumptions regarding stock price, life expectancy, salary and non-incentive compensation amounts and income tax rates and laws.

 

Compensation and/or Benefits
Payable Upon Termination
Death or
Disability
Voluntary
Resignation or
Dismissal For
Cause
RetirementDismissal
Without Cause

(no Change in
Control) (1) (3)

Dismissal Without
Cause or Resignation
For Good Reason
(following a Change

in Control) (1) (2) (3)

Douglas L. Kennedy     
Cash Severance------$1,000,000$2,850,000
Equity Acceleration (4)$2,062,165--$2,062,165--$2,062,165
Welfare Benefits Continuation--------$26,744
Reduction in Payment (5)--------$0
Total Benefit$2,062,165$0$2,062,165$1,000,000$4,938,909
Jeffrey J. Carfora     
Cash Severance------$562,752$1,305,606
Equity Acceleration (4)$797,643--$797,643--$797,643


36 

Welfare Benefits Continuation--------$26,744
Life Insurance Benefit (6) (7)$703,440------$128,458
Reduction in Payment (5)--------$0
Total Benefit$1,501,083$0$797,643$562,752$2,258,451
Finn M. W. Caspersen, Jr.     
Cash Severance------$640,000$1,455,000
Equity Acceleration (4)$908,084--$908,084--$908,084
Welfare Benefits Continuation--------$32,241
Life Insurance Benefit (6) (7)$800,000------$414,369
Reduction in Payment (5)--------$0
Total Benefit$1,708,084$0$908,084$640,000$2,809,694
John P. Babcock     
Cash Severance------$1,000,000$2,250,000
Equity Acceleration (4)$1,430,842--$1,430,842--$1,430,842
Welfare Benefits Continuation--------$32,241
Reduction in Payment (5)--------($72,534)
Total Benefit$1,430,842$0$1,430,842$1,000,000$3,640,549
Eric H. Waser     
Cash Severance------$580,000$710,500
Equity Acceleration (4)$196,550--$196,550--$196,550
Welfare Benefits Continuation--------$14,881
Reduction in Payment (5)--------$0
Total Benefit$196,550$0$196,550$580,000$921,930

The following table does not reflect the potential payments to upon termination or change in control to Mr. Caspersen because he resigned from employment with, and from the board of directors of, the Company and the Bank, effective December 30, 2017. Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the Summary Compensation Table above for further details regarding the amounts payable to Mr. Caspersen in connection with his resignation.

 

Compensation and/or Benefits
Payable Upon Termination
 Death or
Disability
 Voluntary
Resignation or
Dismissal For
Cause
 Retirement Dismissal
Without
Cause(no
Change in
Control) (1) (2)
 Dismissal Without
Cause or Resignation
For Good Reason
(following a Change in
Control) (1) (2) (3)
Douglas L. Kennedy                    
Cash Severance $  $  $  $1,200,000  $3,150,000 
Equity Acceleration (4)  2,984,124      2,984,124      2,984,124 
Welfare Benefits Continuation              14,163 
Life Insurance Benefit (5) (6)  1,250,000            208,510 
Reduction in Payment (7)               
Total Benefit $4,234,124  $  $2,984,124  $1,200,000  $6,356,797 
Jeffrey J. Carfora                    
Cash Severance $  $  $  $632,000  $1,453,800 
Equity Acceleration (4)  1,124,177      1,124,177      1,124,177 
Welfare Benefits Continuation              14,170 
Life Insurance Benefit (5) (6)  721,026            102,922 
Reduction in Payment (7)               
Total Benefit $1,845,203  $  $1,124,177  $632,000  $2,695,069 
Robert A. Plante                    
Cash Severance $  $  $  $  $870,000 
Equity Acceleration (4)               
Welfare Benefits Continuation              18,105 
Life Insurance Benefit (5) (6)               
Reduction in Payment (7)               
Total Benefit $  $  $  $600,000  $888,105 
John P. Babcock                    
Cash Severance $  $  $  $1,000,000  $2,250,000 
Equity Acceleration (4)  2,172,080      2,172,080      2,172,080 
Welfare Benefits Continuation              17,438 
Life Insurance Benefit (5) (6)  1,250,000            97,681 
Reduction in Payment (7)               
Total Benefit $3,422,080  $  $2,172,080  $1,000,000  $4,537,199 
Lisa P. Chalkan                    
Cash Severance $  $  $  $  $555,000 
Equity Acceleration (4)  353,457      353,457      353,457 
Welfare Benefits Continuation              18,105 
Life Insurance Benefit (5) (6)               
Reduction in Payment (7)               
Total Benefit $353,457  $  $353,457  $405,000  $926,562 

37 

(1)The term “cause” generally means (i)(1) willful and continued failure by a named executive officer to perform the officer’s duties, (ii)(2) willful misconduct by the named executive officer whichthat causes material injury to the Company or its successor or (iii)(3) the conviction of a crime, other than a traffic violation, drunkenness, drug abuse, or excessive absenteeism other than for illness.

 

(2)The term “good reason” generally means a change in job description, location, compensation or benefits.

(3)The term “change in control” generally means (i)(1) the acquisition of the Company’s securities representing 30% or more of the voting power of all itsthe Company’s securities, (ii)(2) the first purchase of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a tender or exchange offer, (iii)(3) the shareholder approval of (a) a merger or consolidation of the Company into another corporation wherein the other corporation exercises control over the Company, (b) a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or (c) a plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company, (iv)(4) a change in board membership such that over a two yeartwo-year period the directors constituting the Board at the beginning of such period do not constitute two thirdstwo-thirds of the Board of the Company or a successor corporation at the end of such period, or (v)(5) a sale of (a) the common stock of the Company following which a person or entity other than the Company or its affiliates owns a majority thereof or (b) all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

 

(3)The term “good reason” generally means a change in job description, location, compensation or benefits.

(4)Under Peapack-Gladstone’s variousIn 2016, our 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan was amended (the “Amended 2012 Plan”) to provide for double trigger vesting of equity plans, unvested stock options and restricted stock would immediatelyvesting. The Amended 2012 Plan provides that equity awards assumed by any acquiror will vest in the event ofonly upon specified termination events following a change in control. If awards are not assumed by the acquiror, then outstanding awards will vest upon the change in control. With respect to awards assumed by the surviving entity in connection with a change in control, if the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause or, in certain cases, if the grantee resigns for good reason, within two years after the effective date of the change in control, then the grantee’s outstanding options become fully vested, time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding awards lapse; and unless otherwise provided in the agreement, outstanding performance-based will be deemed to have been earned at target level, or at a level in excess of target in the Committee’s discretion, and paid on a pro rated basis based upon the length of time the grantee was employed during the performance period. The value of equity acceleration reported is based on the market price of $20.62$35.02 as of December 31, 2015.2017. Named executive officers would have three years from the date of termination following a change in control to exercise theany vested options.

 

(5)Peapack-Gladstone has purchased bank-owned life insurance and entered into a split-dollar plan with certain named executive officers and certain other employees to provide current and post-employment life insurance in an amount that ranges from $25,000 to 2.5 times the executive’s annual base salary. A life insurance benefit of 2.5 times the executive’s annual base salary vests if the executive becomes disabled prior to the termination of employment. A benefit of 2.5 times the executive’s salary is paid if the executive dies while employed by Peapack-Gladstone.

(6)The life insurance benefit at dismissal without cause or resignation for good reason following a change in control represents the imputed income from December 2017 through the end of the executive’s plan participation year (calculated on an actuarial basis) under Peapack-Gladstone’s Split-Dollar Plan. Upon a change in control, the executive would vest in the benefit of 2.5 times the executive’s annual base salary.

(7)In the event any payments to the named executive officers would exceed the amount that could be received without the imposition of an excise tax under Section 4999 of Code, the payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to ensure that such payments will be limited to the greater of (i)(1) the dollar amount whichthat can be paid to the named executive officers without triggering an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, or (ii)(2) the greatest after-tax amount payable to the executive after taking into account any excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code on the total payments.

 

The greatest after-tax amount payable to the executive after taking into account any excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code on the total payments to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Plante and CaspersenMs. Chalkan is greater than the dollar amount whichthat can be

30

paid to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Plante and CaspersenMs. Chalkan, without triggering an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. Accordingly, the payments to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Caspersen,Plante and WaserMs. Chalkan in connection with a termination following a change in control on December 31, 20152017 are not subject to a reduction.

 

The dollar amount which can be paid to Mr. Babcock without triggering an excise tax under Section 499938 

(6)Peapack-Gladstone has purchased bank owned life insurance and entered into a split-dollar plan with certain named executive officers and certain other employees to provide current and post-employment life insurance in an amount which ranges from $25,000 to 2.5 times the executive’s annual base salary. A life insurance benefit of 2.5 times the executive’s annual base salary vests if the executive becomes disabled prior to the termination of employment. A benefit of 2.5 times the executive’s salary is paid if the executive dies while employed by Peapack-Gladstone.

(7)The life insurance benefit at dismissal without cause or resignation for good reason following a change in control represents the imputed income from December 2015 through the end of the executive’s plan participation year (calculated on an actuarial basis) under Peapack-Gladstone’s Split-Dollar Plan. Upon a change in control, the executive would vest in the benefit of 2.5 times the executive’s annual base salary.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows information at December 31, 2015 for all equity compensation plans under which shares of our common stock may be issued:

      Number of Securities Remaining
      Available for Future Issuance
  Number of Securities Weighted-Average Under Equity Compensation
  to be issued upon Exercise Exercise Price Plans (Excluding Securities
Plan Category of Outstanding Options (a) of Outstanding Options (b) Reflected in Column (a) (c)
       
Equity      
Compensation      
Plans Approved      
by Security Holders(1) 267,289 $17.28(2)    394,166
       
Equity      
Compensation      
Plans not Approved      
by Security Holders   N/A   N/A   N/A
     Total 267,289 $17.28 394,166

(1)Amounts reflect securities to be issued under our 2006 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, our 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and securities remaining available for future issuance under our 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s executive officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s common stock, file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based upon copies of reports furnished by these insiders of Peapack-Gladstone, all Section 16(a) reporting requirements applicable to insiders during 20152017 were satisfied on a timely basis except forfor: one Form 4 (representing one transaction), which was filed late on behalf of Richard Daingerfield.

31

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONFrancesco Rossi, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer; one Form 3 (representing one transaction), which was filed late on behalf of Robert A. Plante, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer; and one Form 4 (representing one transaction), which was filed late on behalf of Lisa Chalkan, Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer.

 

The Board of Directors has established a Compensation Committee, which has been charged with overseeing executive compensation practices at Peapack-Gladstone. Members of the Board who served on the Compensation Committee during 2015 were Messrs. Meyercord (Chair), Consi, Merton (who retired from the Board and the Compensation Committee on December 31, 2015) and Smith. All members of the Compensation Committee, or their affiliates, have engaged in loan, deposit or trust transactions with the Bank, as discussed below, in “Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons” and under “Director Independence” above. No other relationships required to be reported under the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding compensation interlocks exist with respect to members of Peapack-Gladstone’s Compensation Committee.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS

 

Peapack-Gladstone uses the same policies and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of related persons transactions as described above under the caption “Director Independence.” In addition to the matters discussed above under the captions “Director Independence” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,Independence,” directors and officers and their associates were customers of and had transactions with the Bank during the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, and it is expected that such persons will continue to have such transactions in the future. All deposit accounts, loans, and commitments comprising such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business of the Bank on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons not related to Peapack-Gladstone, and, in the opinion of management of Peapack-Gladstone, did not involve more than normal risks of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

 

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

To the Board of Directors of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation:

We have reviewed and discussed with management Peapack-Gladstone's audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We have discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1 AU Section 380) as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

We have received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and have discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommend to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in Peapack-Gladstone's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The Audit Committee

Anthony J. Consi, II, Chairman

Richard Daingerfield

Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.

James R. Lamb, Esq.

Beth Welsh

March 11, 2016

32

PROPOSAL 3

APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

2012 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

The Board believes that the Peapack-Gladstone Financial 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended on March 21, 2013, March 20, 2014 and March 26, 2015 (the “2012 Stock Incentive Plan”), motivates our executive officers, other officers, employees and non-employee directors to align their interests with those of our shareholders, and helps us to attract and retain competent and dedicated individuals whose efforts will result in the long-term growth and profitability of Peapack-Gladstone.

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan was initially approved by the shareholders on April 24, 2012. Amendments to the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan were thereafter approved by our shareholders at our 2013 and 2014 annual meetings, and in March 2015, the Board further amended the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan to, among other immaterial items, provide for the grant of restricted stock units.

2016 Amendments

On March 16, 2016, our Board of Directors further amended the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, subject to shareholder approval thereof (the “Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan”), to increase the maximum number of shares that Peapack-Gladstone may issue under the plan from 700,000 to 1,200,000 shares. The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan has also been amended to implement double trigger vesting of equity awards in connection with a change in control. In addition, the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan has been amended to provide for the grant of cash-based incentive awards and to incorporate provisions for purposes of granting performance-based restricted stock, restricted stock unit and cash-based awards under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 162(m)”).

We believe the increase in shares is advisable and in the best interests of our shareholders. We continue to execute our Strategic Plan – Expanding Our Reach. As part of this growth plan, we have hired new officers and employees and intend to hire additional new officers and employees and incentivize them through the grant of equity awards in order to align their goals with the interests of our shareholders. Additionally, we will continue to use stock awards as a large portion of executive compensation to continue to ensure their interests are fully aligned with the interests of our shareholders.

Following the approval of the amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan at our 2014 annual meeting, 391,620 shares remained available for issuance under the plan. Since that time (April 22, 2014) and through March 16, 2016, 348,435 time based restricted shares, with varying vesting periods, and no stock options were granted to executive officers and other officer and employees. Also, in March 2015 and March 2016, 7,806 and 9,300, respectively, of time based restricted shares were granted to non-employee directors. Following these grants, and after adjusting for share forfeitures credited back to the plan, 70,727 shares remain available for future issuance under the plan as of March 16, 2016. In the coming years, we intend to continue to grant annual equity awards to our officer, employee and director plan participants and intend to hire additional new officers and employees in connection with our strategic plan and we will grant additional restricted stock awards as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

If our shareholders do not approve the proposal to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, Peapack-Gladstone expects that in less than one year it will have an insufficient number of shares available to make equity-based compensation a meaningful part of our officers’ and employees’ overall compensation. As such, we believe our ability to retain and attract talented employees and to execute our growth plan will be adversely affected due to the ability of the competitors of the Company to offer long-term equity compensation to those individuals. Additionally, we would have to consider providing additional cash compensation to our officers and employees to maintain competitive levels of compensation, thereby diminishing our ability to align compensation with the long-term interests of shareholders.

Approval for Purposes of Section 162(m)

The approval by shareholders of the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan will also be deemed to constitute approval of the material terms of performance-based compensation under the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan for purposes of Section 162(m). In general, Section 162(m) places a limit on the deductibility for U.S. federal income tax purposes on the compensation paid to a company’s chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial officer). Under Section 162(m), compensation paid to such persons in excess of $1 million in a taxable year generally is not deductible. However, compensation that qualifies as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) does not count against the $1 million deduction limit. One of the requirements of “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the performance-based compensation and the performance criteria under which such compensation may be paid be disclosed to and approved by shareholders every five years. For purposes of Section 162(m), material terms include (i) the employees eligible to receive compensation, (ii) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals may be based and (iii) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an employee under the performance goals. Each of these material terms is discussed in greater detail

33

below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this proposal precludes the Committee from granting awards that do not qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m), nor is there any guarantee that awards intended to qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) will ultimately be viewed as qualifying by the Internal Revenue Service.

The following paragraphs summarize material terms of the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the specific terms of the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement asExhibit A.

TYPES OF OPTIONS AND AWARDS

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that a committee designated by the Board to administer the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Committee”) may grant eligible participants incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights and, subject to shareholder approval, cash-based incentive awards. “Incentive stock options” to be granted under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan are intended to constitute “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. “Non-qualified stock options” are those options, which when granted or due to subsequent disqualification, do not qualify as incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

SHARES SUBJECT TO THE 2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN AND INDIVIDUAL AWARD LIMITS

The maximum number of shares that may be issued or transferred pursuant to options or awards for incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights upon approval of the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan is 1,200,000. The maximum number of shares that may be issued per year to any one eligible employee pursuant to options, restricted stock award, restricted stock unit awards and/or stock appreciation rights is 200,000. The maximum number of shares that may be issued per year to any non-employee director is 10,000. The maximum aggregate amount of any cash-based awards that may be paid to any one grantee in any one calendar year shall be $2 million dollars.

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that the Committee will conclusively determine the appropriate adjustments, if any, to the number of shares available and purchase price for stock options and awards in the case of a change in capitalization (as defined in the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan). Any such adjustment to shares subject to outstanding incentive stock options will be made in a manner designed so as not to constitute a modification as defined by Section 424(h)(3) of the Code and only to the extent otherwise permitted by Sections 422 and 424 of the Code.

Whenever any outstanding option expires, is cancelled or is otherwise terminated (other than by exercise of the option or any related stock appreciation right), the shares allocable to the unexercised portion of such option may again be the subject of options and awards under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. Further, whenever any shares subject to an award or option are retained by Peapack-Gladstone upon exercise of an award or option to satisfy the exercise price for, or any withholding or other taxes due with respect to, such award or option, or forfeited for any reason, such shares may again be the subject of options and awards under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.

TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan will terminate on April 23, 2022, the day preceding the tenth anniversary of its effective date. However, the Board of Directors has the right to terminate the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan at any time.

The Board also has the right to amend the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. However, without the approval of Peapack-Gladstone’s shareholders, no amendment may be made to the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan if the amendment would, except as provided under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan for a change in capitalization, require approval under applicable laws, policies or regulations or applicable listing or other requirements of NASDAQ, including amendments that will (a) increase the maximum number of shares as to which options or awards may be granted under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, (b) change the class of persons eligible to participate, or (c) materially extend the term of the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.

The rights under any option or award granted before any amendment to the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan may not be adversely affected by such amendment, except with the consent of the optionee or grantee, as the case may be.

ADMINISTRATION

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the Committee. Each member of the Committee is an independent director and a non-employee director (as defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act as it may be amended from time to time) and an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) as it may be amended from time to time. A majority of the Committee will constitute a quorum and a majority of a quorum may authorize any action. No failure to be so qualified shall invalidate any option or award or any action or inaction under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. 

The Committee has the power to identify each officer, key employee or director qualified to receive an option or award (an “optionee” or “grantee,” respectively) and determine the number of shares subject to each option or award, the amount or value of cash-

34

based awards, the date of grant and the terms and conditions governing the option or award provided, however, that all grants to directors must be approved by the Board of Directors, further provided, that grants to non-employee directors are limited by the amendment to not more than 10,000 per year. The Committee (or with respect to directors, the Board) is also charged with the responsibility of interpreting the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and making all administrative determinations.

ELIGIBILITY

All officers, key employees and non-employee directors of Peapack-Gladstone or its Subsidiaries designated by the Committee (or with respect to directors, the Board) will be eligible to receive options or awards under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (“eligible employees”), but no person may receive any options or awards unless such person is an employee of Peapack-Gladstone or a Subsidiary or a director, at the time the option or award is granted.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK OPTIONS

Term

All options to be granted under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan will be for such term as the Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board) determines, provided that (i) all incentive stock options will not be exercisable after the expiration of ten years from the date granted, and (ii) all non-qualified stock options will not be exercisable after the expiration of ten years and one day from the date granted. The Committee may, subsequent to the granting of any option, extend the term thereof but in no event shall the term as so extended exceed the maximum term provided for in the preceding sentence. The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that any options which are intended to be incentive stock options and are granted to an optionee who owns more than 10% of Peapack-Gladstone’s common stock (a “ten-percent shareholder”) must have terms of five years or less. No incentive options may be granted to a director.

Purchase Price

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that the purchase price shall be set forth in the grant agreement between the eligible employee and Peapack-Gladstone. The purchase price per share under each option must not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share at the time the option is granted (110% in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a ten-percent shareholder). The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan generally defines “fair market value” as the last sale price reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. On March 7, 2016, the last reported sale price of Peapack-Gladstone common stock was $17.10.

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that the purchase price for shares purchased pursuant to the exercise of any option, as well as any required tax withholding, is payable in full at the time of exercise. The purchase price and tax withholding may be paid in cash, by check, or at the discretion of the Committee and upon such terms and conditions as the Committee shall approve, by transferring shares to Peapack-Gladstone or by having shares that would otherwise have been delivered upon exercise withheld by Peapack-Gladstone.

Exercise Period

If the termination of employment is due to the optionee’s “retirement” (as defined in the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan), such options will become fully vested and be exercisable for period of 90 days in the case of incentive stock options, or three years in the case of non-qualified stock options, following such termination of employment. Upon death or termination of employment due to disability (as defined in the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan), all options become immediately and fully exercisable for a period of three years following termination. If an optionee’s employment is terminated by the optionee (other than retirement), or terminates by reason of dismissal for “Cause” (as defined in the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan) the right of the optionee to exercise any outstanding, vested options will terminate on the date of such termination of employment. If an optionee’s employment terminates without cause, the option will be exercisable, to the extent exercisable at the time of termination, for a period of 90 days following termination of employment. In no event may an option be exercised beyond its term.

The Committee has the discretion to grant options which do not become immediately exercisable upon the death, disability or retirement of an optionee. 

Upon the termination of a director’s service as a member of the Board for any reason other than retirement, disability, change in control or death, the director’s options shall be exercisable only as to those shares, which were immediately exercisable by the director at the date of termination. In the event of the death, retirement or disability of a director, all options held by the director shall become immediately exercisable. Upon termination of the director’s service due to or within 12 months after a change in control, all options held by the director shall become immediately exercisable. Options granted to a director shall expire and no longer be exercisable upon the earlier of (i) one hundred twenty (120) months following the date of grant, or (ii) three (3) years following the date on which the director ceases to serve as a director (for any reason other than cause).

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

35

Term

All stock appreciation rights available for issuance under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan will be for such term as the Committee (or with respect to directors, the Board) determines. If granted in connection with an option, such stock appreciation right will cover the same shares covered by the option (or such lesser number of shares as the Committee (or with respect to directors, the Board) may determine) and, except as provided below, be subject to the same term as the related option.

Exercise

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that a stock appreciation right granted in connection with an option is exercisable only at such time or times and to the extent that the related option is exercisable. If such stock appreciation right is connected to an incentive stock option it will be exercisable only if the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise exceeds the purchase price of the related incentive stock option. Generally, upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right related to an option the option is cancelled to the extent that the stock appreciation right is exercised, and upon the exercise of an option related to a stock appreciation right, the stock appreciation right is cancelled to the extent that the option is exercised; however, the Committee may also provide that upon exercise of an option related to a stock appreciation right, the stock appreciation right will also be deemed exercised entitling the grantee to payment of amounts in connection with both the stock appreciation right and the option. The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that a stock appreciation right unrelated to an option will contain such terms and conditions as to exercisability, vesting and duration as the Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board) will determine, but in no event shall they have a term of greater than ten years. Upon the death, disability, or retirement of a grantee, all stock appreciation rights become immediately exercisable. Unless otherwise provided in the agreement, upon the retirement of a grantee, the stock appreciation rights held by the grantee will be exercisable for a period of 90 days following such termination of employment; and upon the death or disability of a grantee, a stock appreciation right unrelated to an option will be exercisable for a period of one year following such termination of employment. Other exercise terms generally parallel those applicable to options. The Committee has the discretion to grant stock appreciation rights which do not become immediately exercisable upon the death, disability or retirement of a grantee.

Payment

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that upon exercise of a stock appreciation right related to an option the grantee will receive an amount determined by multiplying (A) the excess of fair market value of a share on the date of exercise of such stock appreciation right over the per share purchase price of the related option, by (B) the number of shares as to which such stock appreciation right is being exercised. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board) may limit in any manner the amount payable with respect to any stock appreciation right by including such a limit in the agreement evidencing the stock appreciation right at the time it is granted. The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that upon exercise of a stock appreciation right unrelated to an option the grantee will receive an amount determined by multiplying (A) the excess of fair market value of a share on the date of exercise of such stock appreciation right over the fair market value of a share on the date of the grant of the stock appreciation right, by (B) the number of shares as to which such stock appreciation right is being exercised. The Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board) has discretion to make such payments either solely in shares of Peapack-Gladstone’s common stock in a number determined at their fair market value on the date of exercise of the stock appreciation right or in cash or in a combination of cash and shares.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK

Terms and Conditions

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that upon granting a restricted stock award an agreement between the grantee and Peapack-Gladstone will set forth the restrictions, terms, and conditions of the award. Such agreement may require that an appropriate legend be placed on share certificates. Upon the grant of the restricted stock, the shares will be issued in the name of the grantee as soon as reasonably practicable after the purchase price, if any, is paid, and such shares will be deposited with the escrow agent pending termination of the restrictions which apply thereto. The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that upon delivery of such shares to the escrow agent, the grantee will have all rights of a shareholder with respect to the shares, including the right to vote and the right to receive all dividends paid or made with respect to the shares, unless the Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board), in its discretion, determines that such payment of dividends should be deferred. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the 2012 Plan, the Committee may grant under the restricted stock provisions of the 2012 Plan up to an aggregate of 10,000 shares and individually up to 5 shares of stock without restrictions.

In the event of any stock dividend or stock split on restricted stock, new shares issued to the eligible employee will remain subject to the same restrictions.

At the time of an award of shares of restricted stock, the Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board) may, in its discretion, determine that the payment of cash dividends, or a specified portion thereof, declared or paid on shares of restricted stock by Peapack-Gladstone will be deferred until the earlier to occur of (i) the lapsing of the restrictions imposed upon such shares, in which case such cash dividends shall be paid over to the grantee, or (ii) the forfeiture of such shares in which case such cash dividends shall be

36

forfeited to Peapack-Gladstone, and such cash dividends shall be held by Peapack-Gladstone for the account of the grantee until such time. In the event of such deferral, interest may, in the Committee’s discretion, be credited on the amount of such cash dividends held by Peapack-Gladstone for the account of the grantee from time to time at such rate per annum as the Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board), in its discretion, may determine. Payment of deferred cash dividends, together with any interest accrued thereon, will be made or forfeited upon the earlier to occur of the events specified in (i) and (ii).

Restrictions

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that the restrictions upon the shares of restricted stock will lapse at the time or times and on the terms and conditions, including satisfaction of performance criteria as the Committee determines as may be set forth in the agreement. Such restrictions will only lapse if the grantee on the date of the lapse is then and has continuously been an employee of Peapack-Gladstone or a Subsidiary from the date the award was granted. In the event of termination of employment as a result of death, disability or retirement of a grantee, all restrictions upon shares of restricted stock awarded to such grantee will immediately lapse. The Committee has the discretion to grant shares of restricted stock which have restrictions that do not automatically lapse upon the death, disability or retirement of a grantee. The Committee (or, with respect to directors, the Board) may also decide at any time in its absolute discretion and on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, to remove or modify the restrictions upon shares of restricted stock awarded. When the restrictions lapse, Peapack-Gladstone will deliver to the grantee a certificate for the number of shares of common stock without any legend or restrictions (except those required by federal or state securities laws) equivalent to the number of shares of restricted stock for which the restrictions have terminated. Delivery of shares is conditioned upon the grantee’s satisfaction of any tax withholding obligation that arises upon vesting, which withholding obligation may be satisfied by having Peapack-Gladstone withhold a number of shares then vesting equal to the aggregate required withholding tax.

Terms and conditions of restricted stock units

Terms and Conditions

A restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of common stock upon the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions, including without limitation upon the satisfaction of specified performance or other criteria. Restricted stock units represent an unfunded and unsecured obligation of Peapack-Gladstone, except as otherwise provided by the Committee. The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that upon granting a restricted stock unit award, an agreement between Peapack-Gladstone and the grantee will be executed and set forth the restrictions, terms and conditions of the award. If the grantee fails to execute the agreement evidencing a restricted stock unit award or fails to pay the purchase price, if any, for the restricted stock units, the award will be null and void. Holders of restricted stock units do not have any of the rights of a shareholder.

At the time of an award of restricted stock units, the Committee may, in its discretion, determine to provide the grantee with the right to receive cash dividend equivalents with respect to the restricted stock units subject to the award, or to a specified portion. A dividend equivalent is the amount equal to the cash dividend payable per share of common stock, if any, multiplied by the number of shares then underlying the award with respect to any cash dividends declared or paid by Peapack-Gladstone while the award is outstanding. Any dividend equivalents will be credited to the grantee at the time Peapack-Gladstone pays any cash dividends on its shares. Until dividend equivalents vest or are forfeited, interest may, in the Committee’s discretion, be credited on the amount of the dividend equivalent held by Peapack-Gladstone for the account of the grantee from time to time at the a rate per annum determined by the Committee. Any dividend equivalents credited to the grantee will vest at the same time as the underlying restricted stock units, and payment of credited dividend equivalents, with interest, will be made at the time when the underlying restricted stock units convert to shares of common stock. In the event any restricted stock units are forfeited, any dividend equivalents credited to the grantee with respect to such restricted stock units and any interest accrued thereon will also be forfeited.

Restrictions

The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that the restrictions upon restricted stock units will lapse at the time or times and on the terms, conditions and satisfaction of performance criteria as the Committee determines. Such restrictions will only lapse if the grantee on the date of the lapse is then and has continuously been an employee of Peapack-Gladstone or a subsidiary from the date the award was granted or unless the Committee sets a later date for the lapse of restrictions. In the event of termination of employment as a result of death, disability or retirement of a grantee all restrictions upon restricted stock units awarded to such grantee shall thereupon immediately lapse. The Committee has the discretion to grant shares of restricted stock which have restrictions that do not automatically lapse upon the death, disability or retirement of a grantee. In the event of any other termination, unvested restricted stock units are forfeited. The Committee may also decide at any time in its absolute discretion and on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, to remove or modify the restrictions upon restricted stock units. When the restrictions expire or have been cancelled with respect to one or more of the restricted stock units granted, Peapack-Gladstone will notify the grantee and deliver to the grantee a certificate for the number of shares of common stock without any legend or restrictions (except those required by federal or state securities laws), equivalent to the number of restricted stock units for which restrictions have been cancelled or have expired, or alternatively, an applicable book entry shall be made for uncertificated shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if requested by the grantee, the Committee, in its discretion, has the right to cancel any shares to be delivered to the grantee having a fair market value, on the day preceding the date of vesting of the restricted stock units, equal to the aggregate required tax withholding in connection with such vesting, and to apply the value of such shares as payment for the grantee’s aggregate required tax withholding for the vesting of any restricted stock units.

37

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CASH-BASED AWARDS

The Committee is hereby authorized to grant cash-based awards to grantees denominated in cash in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine. Each such cash-based award will specify a payment amount, payment range or a value determined with respect to the fair market value of the shares, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may designate cash-based awards as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) by conditioning the award or the lapse of restrictions on the achievement of performance goals in accordance plan terms and by administering the award to otherwise comply with the requirements of Section 162(m). The Committee is authorized at any time during or after a Performance Period to exercise negative discretion to reduce or eliminate a cash-based award of any grantee in its discretion.

PERFORMANCE GOALS

Under the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, if the Committee intends a restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award or cash-based award to qualify as “other performance based compensation” under Section 162(m), the Committee must establish performance goals for the applicable performance period no later than 90 days after the performance period begins (or by such other date as may be required under Section 162(m)).

Such performance goals must be based on one or more of the following criteria:

·     earnings, earnings growth, earnings per share

·     stock price (including growth measures and total shareholder return)

·     improvement of financial ratings

·     internal rate of return

·     market share

·     cash flow

·     operating income

·     operating margin

·     net profit after tax

·     earnings before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization, whether or not on a continuing operations or an aggregate or per share basis

·     gross profit

·     operating profit

·     cash generation

·     revenues

·     asset quality

·     return on equity

·     return on assets

·     return on operating assets

·     cost saving levels

·     efficiency ratio

·     net income

·     marketing-spending efficiency

·     core non-interest income

·     change in working capital

·     return on capital

·     book value or tangible book value

·     shareholder return

The performance goals may be described in terms of objectives that are related to the individual grantee or objectives that are Company-wide or related to a subsidiary, division, department, region, branch, function or business unit and may, but need not be, measured on an absolute or cumulative basis or on the basis of percentage of improvement over time, measured in terms of Company performance (or performance of the applicable subsidiary, division, department, region, branch, function or business unit) or measured relative to selected peer companies or a market index. Any performance goals that are financial metrics may be determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), or may be adjusted when established to include or exclude any items otherwise includable or excludable under GAAP. When the Committee determines whether a performance goal has been satisfied for any period, the Committee may include or exclude unusual, infrequently occurring or non-recurring charges, asset write downs, losses from discontinued operations, restatements and accounting changes and other unplanned special charges such as restructuring expenses, acquisitions, acquisition or disposition expenses, including expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, stock offerings, stock repurchases and loan loss provisions; provided that in the case of an award intended to qualify under Section 162(m), such inclusion or exclusion will be made in compliance with Section 162(m).

EFFECT OF CHANGE IN CONTROL

The Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan implements double trigger vesting for equity awards. With respect to awards assumed by the surviving entity in connection with a change in control, if the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause or, in certain cases, if the grantee resigns for good reason, within two years after the effective date of the change in control, then the grantee’s outstanding options become fully vested; time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding awards lapse; and unless otherwise provided in the agreement, outstanding performance-based will be deemed to have been earned at target, or at a level in excess of target in the Committee’s discretion, and paid on a pro rated basis based upon the length of time the grantee was employed during the performance period. Awards not assumed by the surviving entity will vest in generally the same manner upon the occurrence of the change in control. The Committee has discretion to make adjustments to outstanding awards upon the occurrence or in anticipation of any

38

corporate event or transaction involving the Company including, among others, any merger, consolidation, or reorganization as provided in the plan.

RECOUPMENT

To the extent required by applicable law (including, without limitation, Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) and/or the rules and regulations of any securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation service on which the Shares are listed or quoted, or if so required pursuant to a written policy adopted by the Company, options and awards shall be subject (including on a retroactive basis) to clawback, forfeiture or similar requirements.

FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES UNDER THE 2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

The following is a summary of the federal income tax consequences of transactions under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, based on federal income tax laws in effect on January 1, 2016. This summary is not intended to be comprehensive and does not describe federal employment tax or state or local income tax consequences.

Pursuant to the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, eligible employees may be granted the following benefits: incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock unit awards and cash-based awards.

Incentive Stock Options.No income is realized by an optionee upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. If shares of common stock are transferred to an optionee upon the exercise of an incentive stock option, and if no disqualifying disposition of such shares is made by such optionee within two years after the date of grant of the option or within one year after the transfer of such shares to such optionee, then (1) upon the sale or exchange of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the option exercise price will be taxed to such optionee as a long-term capital gain and any loss sustained will be treated as a long-term capital loss, and (2) no deduction will be allowed to Peapack-Gladstone for federal income tax purposes. The exercise of an incentive stock option will give rise to an item of tax preference that may result in alternative minimum tax liability for the optionee.

If common stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option is disposed of prior to two years after the grant date or one year after the exercise date, generally (1) the optionee will realize compensation (i.e., ordinary income) in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of such shares at exercise (or if less, the amount realized on the disposition of such shares, if the shares are disposed of by sale or exchange) over the option exercise price paid for such shares, and (2) Peapack-Gladstone will be entitled to deduct the amount of compensation income, which was taxed to the optionee for federal income tax purposes and if the amount represents an ordinary and necessary business expense of Peapack-Gladstone (the “ordinary and necessary test”). Any further gain (or loss) realized by the optionee will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss), as the case may be, and will not result in any deduction by Peapack-Gladstone.

If an incentive stock option is exercised more than three months following the termination of employment, the exercise of the option will generally be taxed in the same manner as the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, except if the termination is due to the death or disability of the employee where the options are exercised within one year after termination of employment by death or disability, the options will retain the favorable tax treatment for incentive options.

Options are eligible for favorable tax treatment as incentive options only to the extent that not more than $100,000 in fair market value at the time of grant (generally measured by the exercise price) first becomes exercisable in any one calendar year. For purposes of this rule, option grants are aggregated and a series of option grants over several years may in the aggregate result in more than $100,000 of options that first became exercisable in any one calendar year. Moreover, options that accelerate in the event of a change-in-control (or otherwise) may also cause more than $100,000 of options to become exercisable in the year of acceleration. If more than $100,000 of options first becomes exercisable in any one year, the excess options are non-qualified options regardless of the characterization in the grant agreement.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. Except as noted below, in the case of non-qualified stock options: (1) no income is realized by the optionee at the time the option is granted; (2) the optionee realizes ordinary income at exercise in an amount equal to the difference between the option exercise price paid for the shares and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise; (3) Peapack-Gladstone is entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the amount of income taxed to the optionee, subject to the ordinary and necessary test; and (4) upon disposition of the common stock acquired by exercise of the option, appreciation (or depreciation) occurring after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss), depending on the recipient’s holding period of the shares.

Stock Appreciation Rights. No income will be realized by a grantee in connection with the grant of a stock appreciation right. When the right is exercised, the grantee generally will be required to include in gross income as ordinary income in the year of exercise an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any shares of common stock received on the exercise. At the same time, Peapack-Gladstone will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount included in the grantee’s gross income by reason of the exercise, subject to satisfaction of the ordinary and necessary test.

39

Upon disposition of common stock acquired upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, appreciation (or depreciation) occurring after the date of exercise will be treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss), depending on the recipient’s holding period of the shares.

Restricted Stock Awards. A recipient of restricted stock generally will not be subject to tax at the time the restricted stock is received, but he/she will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the excess of: 1) the fair market value of the restricted stock when the restricted stock is first either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, over 2) the amount (if any) paid for the stock by the recipient. However, a recipient who so elects under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the date of grant of the restricted shares will recognize taxable ordinary income in the year of receipt of the shares equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares of restricted stock at the time of grant (determined without regard to the restrictions) over the purchase price (if any) of such restricted stock. Upon the subsequent sale or exchange of such stock, the recipient will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the basis of the restricted stock, which will equal the sum of the amount paid for the stock, plus the amount included in gross income upon the grant.

If the restricted shares subject to a Section 83(b) election are forfeited before they are vested, the recipient may be entitled to a capital loss for federal income tax purposes equal to the purchase price (if any) of the forfeited shares, but the recipient will not be entitled to a loss with respect to any income recognized as a result of the Section 83(b) election.

With respect to the sale of the shares after the forfeiture period has expired, the holding period to determine whether the recipient has long-term or short-term capital gain or loss generally begins when the restrictions expire and the tax basis of such shares will generally be based on the fair market value of such shares on such date. However, if the recipient timely makes a Section 83(b) election to be taxed as of the date of the grant of restricted shares, the holding period commences on such date and the tax basis will be equal to the fair market value of the shares on such date (determined without regard to the restrictions). The recipient’s employer generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount that is taxable as ordinary income to the recipient, subject to the ordinary and necessary test.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards.A recipient of restricted stock units will be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates when the shares underlying the units are delivered to the grantee, which is the excess of: 1) the fair market value of the restricted stock unit at the time of delivery, over 2) the amount (if any) paid for the restricted stock unit by the recipient. A recipient may not make an election under Section 83(b) with respect to restricted stock units. When the underlying shares are sold, the recipient will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and basis of the restricted stock units, which will equal the sum of the amount that was subjected to tax when the restricted stock units were delivered and the amount, if any, paid for the restricted stock units.

With respect to the sale of shares acquired under restricted stock units, the holding period to determine whether recipient has long-term or short-term capital gain or loss generally begins when the shares were delivered to the recipient. For restricted stock unit awards, Peapack-Gladstone generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount that is taxable as ordinary income to the recipient.

Dividends on Restricted Stock Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Dividends on restricted stock granted to a participant in the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan which are paid prior to the time such stock becomes vested or transferable by the recipient will generally be treated as compensation which is taxable as ordinary income to the participant and will be deductible by Peapack-Gladstone, subject to satisfaction of the ordinary and necessary test. However, if the recipient of restricted stock makes a timely Section 83(b) election with respect to the stock, dividends paid on such stock will be treated as dividend income, which is taxable to the recipient at a lower tax rate than the ordinary income tax rate, but will not be deductible by Peapack-Gladstone.

Cash-Based Awards.A grantee will not recognize income, and Peapack-Gladstone, will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a cash-based award is granted (for example, when the performance goals are established). Upon receipt of cash in settlement of the award, a grantee will recognize ordinary income equal to the cash received, and Peapack-Gladstone will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Section 162(m).

Stock Swaps.The 2012 Stock Incentive Plan provides that, with Peapack-Gladstone’s permission, an optionee may transfer previously owned shares to Peapack-Gladstone to satisfy the purchase price under an option (a “stock swap”). Generally, if an optionee utilizes previously owned shares to purchase shares upon the exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee will not realize any gain upon the exchange of the old shares for the new shares and will carry over into the same number of new shares the basis and holding period for the old shares. If the optionee purchases more shares than the number of old shares surrendered in the stock swap, the incremental number of shares received in the stock swap will have a basis of zero and a holding period beginning on the date of the exercise of the incentive stock option. If, however, shares acquired through the exercise of an incentive stock option are used in a stock swap prior to the end of the statutory holding period applicable to the old shares, the stock swap will constitute a disqualifying disposition of the old shares, resulting in the immediate recognition of ordinary income. See “Incentive Stock Options,” above.

If a stock swap is used to exercise a nonqualified stock option, the use of old shares to pay the purchase price of an equal number of new shares generally will be tax-free to the optionee, and the optionee will carry over into the new shares the basis and

40

holding period of the old shares. However, if more shares are acquired than surrendered, the incremental shares received in the stock swap will generally be taxed as compensation income in an amount equal to their fair market value at the time of the stock swap. The optionee’s basis in those additional shares will be their fair market value taken into account in quantifying the optionee’s compensation income and the holding period for such shares will begin on the date of the stock swap.

The Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan will allow us to continue to deduct for federal income tax purposes the compensation recognized by our executive officers in connection with certain awards granted under the plan. Peapack-Gladstone exempts from the deductibility limits of Section 162(m) compensation earned from grants of stock options under the Plan and, subject to shareholder approval and compliance with the requirements of Section 162(m), performance-based restricted stock, restricted stock units and cash-based awards.

Ordinary Income Tax Consequences

Capital Gains.Under current law, a taxpayer’s net capital gain (i.e., the amount by which the taxpayer’s net long-term capital gains exceed his net short-term capital losses) from a sale of shares is subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 20% if the shares have been held for more than 12 months. Capital losses are currently deductible against capital gains without limitation, but are currently deductible against ordinary income in any year only to the extent of $3,000 ($1,500 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return). Capital losses which are not currently deductible by reason of the foregoing limitation may be carried forward to future years.

Ordinary Income Tax. Ordinary income earned by reason of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock is subject to tax at rates as high as 39.6%.

THE AMENDED 2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN BENEFITS

There were approximately 212 officers, 130 other employees and nine non-employee directors of Peapack-Gladstone and its subsidiaries as of March 7, 2016. Because the Committee has full discretion to determine who is a key employee, there is no way to predict how many employees may ultimately receive awards or options under the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan or determine in advance the benefits or amounts that will be received in the future by or allocated to specific officers, directors or employees, or groups thereof under the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. No officers, directors or other employees have received awards or will receive awards under the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan before the date of the shareholder meeting.

SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL REQUIREMENT

The provisions of the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan will become effective upon shareholder approval of this Proposal 3 at the Annual Meeting. Unless and until our shareholders approve the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, we will continue to grant awards under the terms of the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, as currently in effect, from the shares currently available for issuance without regard to the amendments being proposed in this Proposal 3. Our Board approved the additional share authority requested under the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan based on a belief that the number of shares currently available under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan does not give us sufficient flexibility to adequately provide for future incentives based on current grant practices. If shareholders do not approve this Proposal 3, however, we will continue to have the authority to grant awards under the existing terms of the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. Shareholder approval of this Proposal 3 will also constitute approval of the performance criteria set forth in the Amended 2012 Stock Incentive Plan pursuant to the shareholder approval requirements of Section 162(m), which will enable us to award qualified performance-based awards through our 2021 Annual Meeting.

RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSAL 3

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2012 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN.

41

PROPOSAL 4

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors appointed Crowe Horwath LLP as independent registered public accounting firm to examine Peapack-Gladstone’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 and to render other professional services as required. Representatives from Crowe Horwath LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting to answer questions and they will have the opportunity to speak if desired. The Audit Committee will consider the outcome of our shareholders’ vote in connection with the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP, but is not bound by the vote. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether a different independent registered public accounting firm should be selected.

Aggregate fees for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, billed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Crowe Horwath LLP (“Crowe”) were as follows:

Type of Service 2015  2014 
Audit Fees (1) $290,000  $260,000 
Audit-Related Fees (2)  101,600   140,000 
Total $391,600  $400,000 

(1)These amounts include fees for professional services rendered by Crowe in connection with the audit of Peapack-Gladstone’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in Peapack-Gladstone’s Quarterly Reports of Form 10-Q.
(2)Includes fees for procedures related to the offering of common stock and consents for registration statements for 2015 and for the at-the-market offering and consents for registration statements for 2014.

RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSAL 4

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE HORWARTH AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.

AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL PROCEDURES

The Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy concerning the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to Peapack-Gladstone. The policy requires that all services to be performed by Crowe Horwath LLP, Peapack-Gladstone’s independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services, audit-related services and permitted non-audit services, be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Specific services being provided by the independent registered public accounting firm are regularly reviewed in accordance with the pre-approval policy. At subsequent Audit Committee meetings, the Audit Committee receives updates on the services actually provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, and management may present additional services for approval. All services rendered by Crowe Horwath LLP are permissible under applicable laws and regulations. Each new engagement of Crowe Horwath LLP was approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

New Jersey corporate law requires that the notice of shareholders'shareholders’ meeting (for either a regular or special meeting) specify the purpose or purposes of such meeting. Thus, any substantive proposals, including shareholder proposals, must be referred to in Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s notice of shareholders'shareholders’ meeting for such proposal to be properly considered at a meeting of Peapack-Gladstone.

 

Proposals of shareholders which are eligible under the rules of the SEC to be included in Peapack-Gladstone'sPeapack-Gladstone’s year 20172019 proxy materials must be received by the Secretary of Peapack-Gladstone no later than November 17, 2016.27, 2018.

 

Under the terms of our by-laws,bylaws, a shareholder who intends to nominate a person for election to our Board or to present an item of business at the 20172019 Annual Meeting (other than a proposal submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials) must deliver to the Secretary of Peapack-Gladstone Bank written notice of such business, including the information specified in the by-laws, no earlier than December 27, 2016bylaws, between January 9, 2019 and no later than January 26, 2017.February 8, 2019. Such notice must meet the requirements in our by-laws.bylaws. If Peapack-Gladstone advances its 20172019 Annual Meeting date to a date more than 30 days from the anniversary date of its 20162018 Annual Meeting or delaydelays it more than 70 days, then notice by the shareholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than 90 days prior to the annual meeting date and not later than the close of business 10 days following the day on which the public announcement of the date of the meeting is made. If Peapack-Gladstone

42

changes the date of its 20172019 Annual Meeting in a manner that alters the deadline, Peapack-Gladstone will so state under Item 5 of the first quarterly report on Form 10-Q it files with the SEC after the date change or notify its shareholders by another reasonable means.

 

OTHER MATTERS WHICH MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING

 

The Board of Directors knows of no business that will be presented for consideration at the meeting other than that stated in this proxy statement. Should any other matter properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, it is intended that proxies in the enclosed form will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.

 

WHETHER YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING OR NOT, YOU ARE URGED TO RETURN YOUR SIGNED PROXY PROMPTLY.

By Order of the Board of Directors

F. DUFFIELD MEYERCORD

CHAIRMAN

Bedminster, New Jersey

March 17, 2016

A COPY OF PEAPACK-GLADSTONE'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR-ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 CAN BE FOUND, ALONG WITH OUR PROXY STATEMENT, AThttp://www.edocumentview.com/PGC, OR IF A REGISTERED SHAREHOLDER REQUESTED A PAPER COPY, IT IS BEING MAILED WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT. HOWEVER, SUCH ANNUAL REPORT IS NOT INCORPORATED INTO THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND IS NOT DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE PROXY SOLICITING MATERIAL.In addition, a copy of our PROXY statement OR Annual Report (without exhibits) will be furnished to any REGISTERED shareholder upon written request addressed to mary m. russell, CORPORATE Secretary, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, 500 HILLS DRIVE, P.O. Box 700, BEDMINSTER, New Jersey 07921.


ExHIBIT A

PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

2012 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

(Adopted by Directors January 19, 2012)

(Approved by Shareholders April 24, 2012)

(Amended by Directors March 21, 2013, Approved by Shareholders April 23, 2013)

(Amended by Directors March 20, 2014, Approved by Shareholders April 22, 2014)

(Amended by Directors March 26, 2015)

(Amended by Directors March 16, 2016, Approved by Shareholders April __, 2016)

1.             Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to provide additional incentive to those officers and key employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries, and certain members of the Board of Directors of the Company whose substantial contributions are essential to the continued growth and success of the Company’s business in order to strengthen their commitment to the Company and its Subsidiaries, to motivate such officers, employees and Directors to faithfully and diligently perform their assigned responsibilities and to attract and retain competent and dedicated individuals whose efforts will result in the long-term growth and profitability of the Company. To accomplish such purposes, the Plan provides that the Company may grant Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights and Cash-Based Awards.

2.             Definitions. For purposes of this Plan:

(a)           “Agreement” means the written agreement between the Company and a Grantee evidencing the grant of an Option or Award and setting forth the terms and conditions thereof.

(b)           “Award” means a grant of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, or a Cash-Based Award or any combination of the foregoing.

(c)           “Bank” means Peapack-Gladstone Bank, a Subsidiary.

(d)           “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(e)           “Cash-Based Award” means any right granted under Section 10.

(f)           “Cause” means an intentional failure to perform stated duties, breach of a fiduciary duty involving personal dishonesty, or willful violation of any law, rule or regulation (other than traffic violations or similar offenses) or final cease-and-desist order. Notwithstanding anything else herein to the contrary, in the event that an employee or Director is terminated or removed for Cause, or resigns at a time when Cause exists, or if, following termination, resignation or removal it is determined that Cause existed at the time of such termination, resignation or removal, then any and all Options and Awards will automatically be terminated and void as of the date that Cause arose, and no notice to that effect is required in order to effect that result.

(g)           “Change in Capitalization” means any increase, reduction, change or exchange of Shares for a different number or kind of shares or other securities of the Company by reason of a reclassification, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, issuance of warrants or rights, extraordinary cash dividend, stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, combination or exchange of shares, repurchase of shares, change in corporate structure or otherwise.

(h)           “Change in Control” means an event of a nature that: (1) any “person” (as the term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) who is not now presently but becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25% or more of the Company’s outstanding securities except for any securities purchased by any tax-qualified employee benefit plan of the Company; or (2) individuals who constitute the Board on the date hereof (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election was approved by a vote of at least three-quarters of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board, or whose nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by the same Nominating Committee serving under an Incumbent Board, shall be, for purposes of this clause (2), considered as though he were a member of the Incumbent Board; or (3) consummation of regulatory approval to implement a plan of reorganization, merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all the assets of the Company or similar transaction in which the Company is not the resulting entity or such plan, merger, consolidation, sale or similar transaction occurs; or (4) a proxy statement soliciting proxies from shareholders of the Company shall be distributed by someone other than the current management of the Company, seeking stockholder approval of a plan of reorganization, merger or consolidation of the Company or similar transaction with one or more corporations, and, following such distribution, the outstanding shares of the class of securities then subject to the plan or transaction are exchanged for or converted into cash or property or securities not issued by the Company; or (5) a tender offer is made for 25% or more of the voting securities of the Company.

44

(i)           “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(j)           “Committee” means a committee consisting solely of two (2) or more directors who are Non-Employee Directors (as defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act as it may be amended from time to time) of the Company and outside directors as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code (as it may be amended from time to time) appointed by the Board to administer the Plan and to perform the functions set forth herein. Directors appointed by the Board to the Committee shall have the authority to act notwithstanding the failure to be so qualified.

(k)           “Company” means Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, a New Jersey corporation.

(l)           “Director” means a member of the Board who is not also serving as an employee of the Company.

(m)           “Disability” means the permanent and total inability by reason of mental or physical infirmity, or both, of an employee or Director to perform the work customarily assigned to him. Additionally, a medical doctor selected or approved by the Board must advise the Committee that it is either not possible to determine when such Disability will terminate or that it appears probable that such Disability will be permanent during the remainder of the individual’s lifetime.

(n)           “Eligible Employee” means any officer or other key employee of the Company or a Subsidiary designated by the Committee as eligible to receive Options or Awards subject to the conditions set forth herein.

(o)           “Escrow Agent” means the escrow agent under the Escrow Agreement, designated by the Committee. The Bank may be appointed as the Escrow Agent.

(p)           “Escrow Agreement” means an agreement between the Company, the Escrow Agent and a Grantee, in the form specified by the Committee, under which shares of Restricted Stock awarded pursuant hereto shall be held by the Escrow Agent until either (a) the restrictions relating to such shares expire and the shares are delivered to the Grantee or (b) the Company reacquires the shares pursuant hereto and the shares are delivered to the Company.

(q)           “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(r)           “Fair Market Value” means the fair market value of the Shares as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion using a method that complies with Section 409A of the Code; provided, however, that (A) if the Shares are listed on NASDAQ, the New York Stock Exchange or other national securities exchange, Fair Market Value on any date shall be the last sale price reported for the Shares on such exchange on such date or on the last date preceding such date on which a sale was reported, or (B) if the Shares are then traded in an over-the-counter market, Fair Market Value on any date shall be the mean of the high bid and low asked prices for the Shares in such over-the-counter market for such date or on the last date preceding such date on which high bid and low asked prices exist.

(s)           “Grantee” means a person to whom an Option or Award has been granted under the Plan.

(t)           “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

(u)           “Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option which is not an Incentive Stock Option.

(v)           “Option” means an Incentive Stock Option, a Nonqualified Stock Option, or either or both of them.

(w)           “Parent” means any corporation in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company, if each of the corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of one of the other corporations in such chain.

(x)           “Plan” means the Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan as set forth in this instrument and as it may be amended from time to time.

(y)           “Restricted Stock” means Shares issued or transferred to an Eligible Employee or Director which may be subject to restrictions as provided in Section 8 hereof.

(z)           “Restricted Stock Unit” means a right to receive one Share upon the satisfaction of terms and conditions as provided in Section 9 hereof, including without limitation the satisfaction of specified performance or other criteria. Restricted Stock Units represent an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company, except as otherwise provided by the Committee.

(aa)           “Retirement” means the retirement from active employment of an employee or officer, but only if such person meets all of the following requirements: (i) he has a minimum combined total of years of service to the Company or any Subsidiary (excluding service to any acquired company) and age equal to eighty (80), (ii) he is age sixty-two (62) or older, and (iii) he provides six (6) months prior written notice to the Company of the retirement. For Directors, the term “Retirement” shall mean the date on which the Director ceases to be a member of the Board after both attaining age sixty (60) and completing at least ten (10) years of service on the Board.

(bb)            “Shares” means the common stock, no par value, of the Company (including any new, additional or different stock or securities resulting from a Change in Capitalization).

45

(cc)           “Stock Appreciation Right” means a right to receive all or some portion of the increase in the value of shares of Common Stock as provided in Section 7 hereof.

(dd)           “Subsidiary” means any corporation in an unbroken chain of corporations, beginning with the Company, if each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

(ee)           “Ten-Percent Shareholder” means an Eligible Employee, who, at the time an Incentive Stock Option is to be granted to him, owns (within the meaning of Section 422(b)(6) of the Code) stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company, a Parent or a Subsidiary within the meaning of Section 422(b)(6) of the Code.

3.             Administration.

(a)           The Plan shall be administered by the Committee which shall hold meetings at such times as may be necessary for the proper administration of the Plan. The Committee shall keep minutes of its meetings. A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum and a majority of a quorum may authorize any action. Each member of the Committee shall be a Non-Employee Director (as defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act as it may be amended from time to time) and an outside director as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code as it may be amended from time to time. No failure to be so qualified shall invalidate any Option or Award or any action or inaction under the Plan. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action, determination or interpretation made in good faith with respect to the Plan, the Options or the Awards, and all members of the Committee shall be fully indemnified by the Company with respect to any such action, determination or interpretation.

Subject to the express terms and conditions set forth herein, the Committee shall have the power from time to time:

(1)           to determine those Eligible Employees to whom Options shall be granted under the Plan and the number of Incentive Stock Options and/or Nonqualified Options to be granted to each Eligible Employee and to prescribe the terms and conditions (which need not be identical) of each Option, including the purchase price per share of each Option;

(2)           to select those Eligible Employees to whom Awards shall be granted under the Plan and to determine the number of shares of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and/or Stock Appreciation Rights to be granted pursuant to each Award and the amount or value of Cash-Based Awards, the terms and conditions of each Award, including the restrictions or performance criteria relating to such shares, units or rights, the purchase price per share, if any, of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units and whether Stock Appreciation Rights will be granted alone or in conjunction with an Option;

(3)           to construe and interpret the Plan and the Options and Awards granted thereunder and to establish, amend and revoke rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan, including, but not limited to, correcting any defect or supplying any omission, or reconciling any inconsistency in the Plan or in any Agreement, in the manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or advisable to make the Plan fully effective, and all decisions and determinations by the Committee in the exercise of this power shall be final and binding upon the Company or a Subsidiary and Grantees;

(4)           to determine the duration and purposes for leaves of absence which may be granted to a Grantee without constituting a termination of employment or service for purposes of the Plan; and

(5)           generally, to exercise such powers and to perform such acts as are deemed necessary or advisable to promote the best interests of the Company with respect to the Plan.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Committee may, from time to time, recommend the grant of Options and Awards to the Directors in such numbers and upon such terms as it deems appropriate, but all such grants must be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

4.             Stock Subject to Plan; Individual Award Limits.

(a)           The maximum number of Shares that may be issued or transferred pursuant to all Options and Awards under this Plan is 1,200,000, of which not more than 200,000 Shares may be issued or transferred pursuant to Options, Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Unit Awards and/or Stock Appreciation Rights to any one Eligible Employee during any one calendar year. Not more than 10,000 Shares may be issued or transferred pursuant to Options and/or Awards to any Director during any one calendar year. The maximum number of Shares that may be issued or transferred pursuant to Incentive Stock Options shall be 200,000. Upon a Change in Capitalization after the adoption of this Plan by the Board, the Shares shall be adjusted to the number andkind of Shares of stock or other securities existing after such Change in Capitalization. The maximum aggregate amount of any Cash-Based Awards that may be paid to any one Grantee in any one calendar year shall be $2 million dollars.

(b)           Whenever any outstanding Option or portion thereof expires, is cancelled or is otherwise terminated (other than by exercise of the Option or any related Stock Appreciation Right), the shares of Common Stock allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option may again be the subject of Options and Awards hereunder.

(c)           Whenever any Shares subject to an Award or Option are (i) resold to the Company, (ii) retained by the

46

Company upon exercise of an Award or Option in order to satisfy the exercise price for such Award or Option or any withholding or other taxes due with respect to such Option or Award, or (iii) forfeited for any reason pursuant to the terms of the Plan, such Shares may again be the subject of Options and Awards hereunder.

5.             Eligibility. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee (or, with respect to Directors, the Board) shall have full and final authority to select those Eligible Employees who will receive Options and/or Awards, but no person shall receive any Options or Awards unless he or she is an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary, or a Director, at the time the Option or Award is granted.

6.             Stock Options. The Committee (or, with respect to Directors, the Board) may grant Options in accordance with the Plan, the terms and conditions of which shall be set forth in an Agreement. Each Option and Option Agreement shall be subject to the following conditions:

(a)           Purchase Price. The purchase price or the manner in which the purchase price is to be determined for Shares under each Option shall be set forth in the Agreement, provided that the purchase price per Share under each Incentive Stock Option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share at the time the Option is granted (110% in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten-Percent Shareholder) and under each Nonqualified Stock Option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share at the time the Option is granted. Incentive Stock Options cannot be granted to Directors.

(b)           Duration. Options granted hereunder shall be for such term as the Committee shall determine, provided that (i) no Incentive Stock Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date it is granted (five (5) years in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten-Percent Shareholder) and (ii) no Nonqualified Stock Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years and one (1) day from the date it is granted.

(c)           Non-Transferability. No Option granted hereunder shall be transferable by the Grantee to whom granted otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and an Option may be exercised during the lifetime of such Grantee only by the Grantee or his guardian or legal representative. The terms of such Option shall be binding upon the beneficiaries, executors, administrators, heirs and successors of the Grantee.

(d)           Stock Options; Vesting. Each Option shall be exercisable in such installments (which need not be equal) and at such times as may be designated by the Committee or the Board as set forth in the Option Agreement. Unless otherwise provided in the Agreement, to the extent not exercised, installments shall accumulate and be exercisable, in whole or in part, at any time after becoming exercisable, but not later than the date the Option expires. Upon the death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee, all Options shall become immediately exercisable, provided, however, that the Committee shall have the authority to grant Options that do not become immediately exercisable in the event of the death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee by including such provision in the Option Agreement evidencing such Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee (or, with respect to Directors, the Board) may accelerate the exercisability of any Option or portion thereof at any time.

(e)           Method of Exercise. The exercise of an Option shall be made only by a written notice delivered in person or by mail (including electronic mail) to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive office, specifying the number of Shares to be purchased and accompanied by payment therefor, as well as for any required tax withholding, and otherwise in accordance with the Agreement pursuant to which the Option was granted. The purchase price for any Shares purchased pursuant to the exercise of an Option and required tax withholding shall be paid in full upon such exercise in cash, by check, or, at the discretion of the Committee and upon such terms and conditions as the Committee shall approve, by transferring Shares to the Company or by having Shares that would otherwise have been delivered to the Grantee upon exercise of an Option withheld by the Company. Any Shares transferred to or withheld by the Company as payment of the purchase price or tax withholding under an Option shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the day preceding the date of exercise of such Option. If requested by the Committee, the Grantee shall deliver the Agreement evidencing the Option and the Agreement evidencing any related Stock Appreciation Right to the Secretary of the Company who shall endorse thereon a notation of such exercise and return such Agreement to the Grantee.

(f)           Rights of Grantees. No Grantee shall be deemed for any purpose to be the owner of any Shares subject to any Option unless and until (i) the Option shall have been exercised pursuant to the terms thereof, (ii) the Company shall have issued and delivered the Shares to the Grantee, and (iii) the Grantee’s name shall have been entered as a shareholder of record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Grantee shall have full voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such Shares.

(g)           Termination of Employment. In the event that a Grantee who is not a Director ceases to be employed by the Company or any Subsidiary, any outstanding Options held by such Grantee shall, unless the Option Agreement evidencing such Option provides otherwise, terminate as follows:

(1)           If the Grantee’s termination of employment is due to his death or Disability, the Options shall become fully vested and shall be exercisable for a period of three years following such termination of employment, and shall thereafter terminate;

(2)           If the Grantee’s termination of employment is by the Grantee (other than due to the Grantee’s Retirement), the Option shall terminate on the date of the termination of employment;

47

(3)           If the termination of employment is due to the Grantee’s Retirement, the Option shall become fully vested and shall be exercisable for 90 days (three years for an Option designated initially as a Nonqualified Stock Option); and

(4)           If the Grantee’s termination of employment is for any other reason, the Option (to the extent exercisable at the time of the Grantee’s termination of employment) shall be exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days following such termination of employment, and shall thereafter terminate.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may provide, either at the time an Option is granted or thereafter, that the Option may be exercised after the periods provided for in this Section 6(g), but in no event beyond the term of the Option. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 6(g), no Option shall be exercisable beyond the term of the Option.

(h)           Termination of Service for Directors. Unless otherwise provided in the Option Agreement, upon the termination of a Director’s service as a member of the Board for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, Change in Control or death, the Director’s Options shall be exercisable only as to those Shares which were immediately exercisable by the Director at the date of termination. Unless otherwise provided in the Option Agreement, in the event of the death, Retirement or Disability of a Director, all Options held by the Director shall become immediately exercisable; and upon termination of the Director’s service due to or within 12 months after a Change in Control, all Options held by the Director shall become immediately exercisable. Options granted to a Director shall expire and no longer be exercisable upon the earlier of (i) one hundred twenty (120) months following the date of grant, or (ii) three (3) years following the date on which the Director ceases to serve as a Director (for any reason other than Cause).

7.           Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may, in its discretion, either alone or in connection with the grant of an Option, grant Stock Appreciation Rights in accordance with the Plan, the terms and conditions of which shall be set forth in an Agreement. If granted in connection with an Option, a Stock Appreciation Right shall cover the same shares covered by the Option (or such lesser number of shares as the Committee may determine) and shall, except as provided in this Section 7, be subject to the same terms and conditions as the related Option.

(a)           Time of Grant. A Stock Appreciation Right may be granted:

(i)           at any time if unrelated to an Option; or

(ii)           if related to an Option, at the time of grant of the Option.

(b)           Stock Appreciation Rights Related to an Option.

(1)           Payment. A Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Option shall entitle the holder thereof, upon exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right or any portion thereof, to receive payment of an amount computed pursuant to Section 7(b)(3).

(2)           Exercise. A Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Option shall be exercisable at such time or times and only to the extent that the related Option is exercisable, and will not be transferable except to the extent the related Option may be transferable. A Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Incentive Stock Option shall be exercisable only if the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise exceeds the purchase price specified in the related Incentive Stock Option.

(3)           Amount Payable. Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right related to an Option, the Grantee shall be entitled to receive an amount determined by multiplying (A) the excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise of such Stock Appreciation Right over the per Share purchase price under the related Option, by (B) the number of Shares as to which such Stock Appreciation Right is being exercised. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may limit in any manner the amount payable with respect to any Stock Appreciation Right by including such a limit in the Agreement evidencing the Stock Appreciation Right at the time it is granted.

(4)           Treatment of Related Options and Stock Appreciation Rights Upon Exercise. Except as provided in Section 7(b)(5), (A) upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Option, the Option shall be cancelled to the extent of the number of Shares as to which the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised and (B) upon the exercise of an Option granted in connection with a Stock Appreciation Right, the Stock Appreciation Right shall be cancelled to the extent of the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised.

(5)           Simultaneous Exercise of Stock Appreciation Right and Option. The Committee may provide, either at the time a Stock Appreciation Right is granted in connection with a Nonqualified Stock Option or thereafter during the term of the Stock Appreciation Right, that upon exercise of such Option, the Stock Appreciation Right shall automatically be deemed to be exercised to the extent of the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised. In such event, the Grantee shall be entitled to receive the amount described in Section 7(b)(3) (or some percentage of such amount if so provided in the Agreement evidencing the Stock Appreciation Right), in addition to the Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of the Option. The inclusion in an Agreement evidencing a Stock Appreciation Right of a provision described in this Section 7(b)(5) may be in addition to and not in lieu of the right to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right as otherwise provided herein and in the Agreement.

48

(c)           Stock Appreciation Rights Unrelated to an Option. The Committee may grant to Eligible Employees (and the Board may grant to Directors) Stock Appreciation Rights unrelated to Options. Stock Appreciation Rights unrelated to Options shall contain such terms and conditions as to exercisability, vesting and duration as the Committee or the Board shall determine, but in no event shall they have a term of greater than ten (10) years. Upon the death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee, all Stock Appreciation Rights shall become immediately exercisable provided, however, that the Committee or Board shall have the authority to grant Stock Appreciation Rights that do not become immediately exercisable in the event of the death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee by including such provision in the Agreement evidencing such Stock Appreciation Right. Unless otherwise provided in the Agreement, upon the death or Disability of a Grantee, the exercisable portion of Stock Appreciation Rights held by that Grantee shall be exercisable for a period of one (1) year following such termination of employment or service, and shall thereafter terminate; and upon the Retirement of a Grantee, the exercisable portion of Stock Appreciation Rights held by that Grantee shall be exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days following such Retirement, and shall thereafter terminate. The amount payable upon exercise of such Stock Appreciation Rights shall be determined in accordance with Section 7(b)(3), except that “Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of the grant of the Stock Appreciation Right” shall be substituted for “purchase price under the related Option.”

(d)           Method of Exercise. Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercised by a Grantee only by a written notice delivered in person or by mail to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive office, specifying the number of Shares with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right is being exercised. If requested by the Committee, the Grantee shall deliver the Agreement evidencing the Stock Appreciation Right being exercised and the Agreement evidencing any related Option to the Secretary of the Company who shall endorse thereon a notation of such exercise and return such Agreements to the Grantee.

(e)           Form of Payment. Payment of the amount determined under Sections 7(b)(3) or 7(c), may be made solely in whole shares of Common Stock in a number determined at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right or, alternatively, at the sole discretion of the Committee, solely in cash, or in a combination of cash and Shares as the Committee deems advisable. If the Committee decides to make full payment in Shares, and the amount payable results in a fractional Share, payment for the fractional Share will be made in cash.

8.           Restricted Stock. The Committee (or, with respect to Directors, the Board) may grant Awards of Restricted Stock which shall be evidenced by an Agreement between the Company and the Grantee. Each Agreement shall contain such restrictions, terms and conditions as the Committee or Board may require and (without limiting the generality of the foregoing) such Agreements may require that an appropriate legend be placed on Share certificates. Awards of Restricted Stock shall be subject to the following terms and provisions:

(a)           Rights of Grantee. Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to an Award hereunder shall be issued in the name of the Grantee as soon as reasonably practicable after the Award is granted and the purchase price, if any, is paid by the Grantee; provided, that the Grantee has executed an Agreement evidencing the Award, an Escrow Agreement, appropriate blank stock powers and any other documents which the Committee, in its absolute discretion, may require as a condition to the issuance of such Shares. If a Grantee shall fail to execute the Agreement evidencing a Restricted Stock Award, an Escrow Agreement or appropriate blank stock powers or shall fail to pay the purchase price, if any, for the Restricted Stock, the Award shall be null and void. Shares issued in connection with a Restricted Stock Award, together with the stock powers, shall be deposited with the Escrow Agent. Except as restricted by the terms of the Agreement, upon the delivery of the Shares to the Escrow Agent, the Grantee shall have all of the rights of a shareholder with respect to such Shares, including the right to vote the shares and to receive, subject to Section 8(d), all dividends or other distributions paid or made with respect to the Shares.

(b)           Non-Transferability. Until any restrictions upon the Shares of Restricted Stock awarded to a Grantee shall have lapsed in the manner set forth in Section 8(c), such Shares shall not be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and shall not be pledged or otherwise hypothecated, nor shall they be delivered to the Grantee. Upon the termination of employment of the Grantee, all of such Shares with respect to which restrictions have not lapsed shall be resold by the Grantee to the Company at the same price paid by the Grantee for such Shares or shall be forfeited and automatically transferred to and reacquired by the Company at no cost to the Company if no purchase price had been paid for such Shares. The Committee may also impose such other restrictions and conditions on the Shares as it deems appropriate.

(c)           Lapse of Restrictions.

(1)           Restrictions, if any, upon Shares of Restricted Stock awarded hereunder shall lapse at such time or times and on such terms, conditions and satisfaction of performance criteria as the Committee (or, when applicable, the Board) may determine;provided, however, that the restrictions upon such Shares shall lapse only if the Grantee on the date of such lapse is then and has continuously been an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary (or a member of the Board) from the date the Award was granted, or unless the Committee sets a later date for the lapse of such restrictions.

(2)           In the event of termination of employment (or termination of service as a Director) as a result of death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee, all restrictions upon Shares of Restricted Stock awarded to such Grantee shall thereupon immediately lapse, provided, however, that the Committee or Board shall have the authority to grant Awards the restrictions on which do not lapse in the event of the termination of employment or service as a result of the death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee by including such provision

49

in the Agreement evidencing such Award.

(3)           The Committee or Board may also decide at any time in its absolute discretion and on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, to remove or modify the restrictions upon Shares of Restricted Stock awarded hereunder.

(d)           Treatment of Cash Dividends. At the time of an Award of Shares of Restricted Stock, the Committee may, in its discretion, determine that the payment to the Grantee of cash dividends, or a specified portion thereof, declared or paid on Shares of Restricted Stock by the Company, shall be deferred until the earlier to occur of (i) the lapsing of the restrictions, if any, imposed upon such Shares, in which case such cash dividends shall be paid over to the Grantee, or (ii) the forfeiture of such Shares under Section 8(b) hereof, in which case such cash dividends shall be forfeited to the Company, and such dividends shall be held by the Company for the account of the Grantee until such time. In the event of such deferral, interest may be credited on the amount of any such cash dividends held by the Company for the account of the Grantee from time to time at such rate per annum as the Committee, in its discretion, may determine. Payment of deferred cash dividends, together with any interest accrued thereon as aforesaid, shall be made upon the earlier to occur of the events specified in (i) and (ii) of the immediately preceding sentence, in the manner specified therein.

(e)           Delivery of Shares. When any restrictions imposed hereunder and in the Plan expire or have been cancelled with respect to one or more shares of Restricted Stock, the Company shall notify the Grantee and the Escrow Agent of same. The Escrow Agent shall then return the certificate covering the Shares of Restricted Stock to the Company and upon receipt of such certificate the Company shall deliver to the Grantee (or such Grantee’s legal representative, beneficiary or heir) a certificate for a number of shares of Common Stock, without any legend or restrictions (except those required by any federal or state securities laws), equivalent to the number of Shares of Restricted Stock for which restrictions have been cancelled or have expired (or alternatively, an applicable book entry shall be made for uncertificated Shares). If applicable, a new certificate covering Shares of Restricted Stock previously awarded to the Grantee which remain restricted shall be issued to the Grantee and held by the Escrow Agent and the Agreement, as it relates to such shares, shall remain in effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if requested by the Grantee, the Committee or the Board, in its discretion, has the right to cancel Shares of Restricted Stock to be delivered to the Grantee having a Fair Market Value, on the day preceding the date of vesting of the Restricted Stock, equal to the aggregate required tax withholding in connection with such vesting, and to apply the value of such Shares of Restricted Stock as payment for the Grantee’s aggregate required tax withholding for the vesting of any Shares of Restricted Stock.

(f)           Unrestricted Shares. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, the Committee shall have the right to grant Awards of Restricted Stock to employees of the Company that are not evidenced by an Agreement, which are fully vested as of the grant date of the Award and which do not contain a restrictive legend. The amount of any aggregate Awards under this Section 8(f) shall not exceed 10,000 shares and any individual Award under this Section 8(f) shall not exceed 5 shares.

9.             Restricted Stock Units. The Committee (or, with respect to Directors, the Board) may grant Awards of Restricted Stock Units which shall be evidenced by an Agreement between the Company and the Grantee. Each Agreement shall contain such restrictions, terms and conditions as the Committee or Board may require. Awards of Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the following terms and provisions:

(a)           Rights of Grantee. Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to an Award hereunder shall be issued in the name of the Grantee as soon as reasonably practicable after the Award is granted and the purchase price, if any, is paid by the Grantee, provided that the Grantee has executed an Agreement evidencing the Award and any other documents which the Committee, in its absolute discretion, may require as a condition to the issuance of such Restricted Stock Units. If a Grantee shall fail to execute the Agreement evidencing a Restricted Stock Unit Award or shall fail to pay the purchase price, if any, for the Restricted Stock Units, the Award shall be null and void. The Grantee shall not have any of the rights of a shareholder with respect to Restricted Stock Units, subject to Section 9(d).

(b)           Non-Transferability. Until any restrictions upon the Restricted Stock Units awarded to a Grantee shall have lapsed in the manner set forth in Section 9(c), such Restricted Stock Units shall not be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and shall not be pledged or otherwise hypothecated. Upon the termination of employment of the Grantee, all of such Restricted Stock Units with respect to which restrictions have not lapsed shall be forfeited at no cost to the Company if no purchase price had been paid for such Restricted Stock Units. The Committee may also impose such other restrictions and conditions on the Restricted Stock Units as it deems appropriate.

(c)           Lapse of Restrictions.

(1)           Restrictions upon Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder shall lapse at such time or times and on such terms, conditions and satisfaction of performance criteria as the Committee (or, when applicable, the Board) may determine; provided, however, that the restrictions upon such Restricted Stock Units shall lapse only if the Grantee on the date of such lapse is then and has continuously been an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary (or a member of the Board) from the date the Award was granted, or unless the Committee sets a later date for the lapse of such restrictions.

50

(2)           In the event of termination of employment (or termination of service as a Director) as a result of death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee, all restrictions upon Restricted Stock Units awarded to such Grantee shall thereupon immediately lapse, provided, however, that the Committee or Board shall have the authority to grant Awards of Restricted Stock Units the restrictions on which do not lapse in the event of the termination of employment or service as a result of the death, Disability or Retirement of a Grantee by including such provision in the Agreement evidencing such Award.

(3)           The Committee or Board may also decide at any time in its absolute discretion and on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, to remove or modify the restrictions upon Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder.

(d)           Treatment of Cash Dividends. At the time of an Award of Restricted Stock Units, the Committee may, in its discretion, determine to provide the Grantee with the right to receive cash Dividend Equivalents with respect to the Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award, or a specified portion thereof. A “Dividend Equivalent” is an amount equal to the cash dividend payable per Share, if any, multiplied by the number of Shares then underlying the Award with respect to any cash dividends declared or paid by the Company while the Award is outstanding. Any such Dividend Equivalents shall be credited to the Grantee at the time the Company pays any cash dividend on its Shares. Until such time as the Dividend Equivalents vest or are forfeited, interest may be credited on the amount of such Dividend Equivalents held by the Company for the account of the Grantee from time to time at such rate per annum as the Committee, in its discretion, may determine. Any Dividend Equivalents credited to the Grantee shall vest at the same time as the underlying Restricted Stock Units, and payment of credited Dividend Equivalents, together with any interest accrued thereon, shall be made at the time when the underlying Restricted Stock Units convert to Shares. In the event any Restricted Stock Units are forfeited under Section 9(c) hereof, any Dividend Equivalents credited to Grantee with respect to such forfeited Restricted Stock Units and any interest accrued thereon shall be forfeited to the Company, and the Grantee shall have no rights and the Company shall have no liability as to such Dividend Equivalents or interest.

(e)           Delivery of Shares. When the restrictions imposed hereunder and in the Plan expire or have been cancelled with respect to one or more of the Restricted Stock Units granted under the Plan, the Company shall notify the Grantee of same. The Company shall then deliver to the Grantee (or such Grantee’s legal representative, beneficiary or heir) a certificate for a number of Shares, without any legend or restrictions (except those required by any federal or state securities laws), equivalent to the number of Restricted Stock Units for which restrictions have been cancelled or have expired (or alternatively, an applicable book entry shall be made for uncertificated Shares). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if requested by the Grantee, the Committee or the Board, in its discretion, has the right to cancel Shares to be delivered to the Grantee having a Fair Market Value, on the day preceding the date of vesting of the Restricted Stock Units, equal to the aggregate required tax withholding in connection with such vesting, and to apply the value of such Shares as payment for the Grantee’s aggregate required tax withholding for the vesting of any Restricted Stock Units.

(f)           Compliance with Section 409A of the Code. Restricted Stock Units are intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code and provisions of the Plan and Awards shall be interpreted in a manner intended to be consistent with Section 409A.

10.           Cash-Based Awards. The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Cash-Based Awards to Grantees denominated in cash in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine. Each such Cash-Based Award shall specify a payment amount, payment range or a value determined with respect to the Fair Market Value of the Shares, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may designate Cash-Based Awards as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) by conditioning the Award or the lapse of restrictions on the achievement of performance goals in accordance with Section 11(a) and by administering the Award to otherwise comply with the requirements of Section 11 and Code Section 162(m). The Committee is authorized at any time during or after a Performance Period to exercise negative discretion to reduce or eliminate a Cash-Based Award of any Grantee for any reason in its discretion, including, without limitation, changes in the position or duties of any Grantee with the Company or any Subsidiary during or after a Performance Period, whether due to any termination of employment (including death, disability, retirement, voluntary termination or termination with or without cause) or otherwise.

11.           Performance Goals

(a)           If, at the time of grant, the Committee intends a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit Award or Cash-Based Award to qualify as “other performance based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m), the Committee must establish performance goals for the applicable Performance Period no later than 90 days after the Performance Period begins (or by such other date as may be required under Code Section 162(m)). Such performance goals must be based on one or more of the criteria described in Section 11(b). “Performance Period” means the period selected by the Committee during which performance is measured for purpose of determining the extent to which an award of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or a Cash-Based Award has been earned.


(b)           A performance goal described in Section 11(a) shall be based on one or more of the following criteria: earnings, earnings growth, earnings per share, stock price (including growth measures and total shareholder return), improvement of financial ratings, internal rate of return, market share, cash flow, operating income, operating margin, net profit after tax, earnings before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization, whether or not on a continuing operations or an aggregate or per share basis, gross profit, operating profit, cash generation, revenues, asset quality, return on equity, return on assets, return on operating assets, cost saving levels, efficiency ratio, net income, marketing-spending efficiency, core non-interest income, change in working capital, return on capital, book value or tangible book value, or shareholder return. The performance goals may be described in terms of objectives that are related to the individual Grantee or objectives that are Company-wide or related to a Subsidiary, division, department, region, branch, function or business unit and may, but need not be, measured on an absolute or cumulative basis or on the basis of percentage of improvement over time, measured in terms of Company performance (or performance of the applicable Subsidiary, division, department, region, branch, function or business unit) or measured relative to selected peer companies or a market index. Any performance goals that are financial metrics, may be determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), or may be adjusted when established to include or exclude any items otherwise includable or excludable under GAAP. For any Award not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 162(m), the Committee may establish performance goals based on any other performance criteria it deems appropriate. These performance goals are subject to approval by shareholders at the Company’s 2016 annual meeting, and once approved, should be submitted for re-approval by the Company’s shareholders no later than the 2021 annual shareholder meeting, and thereafter, once every five years.

(c)           When the Committee determines whether a performance goal has been satisfied for any period, the Committee may include or exclude unusual, infrequently occurring or non-recurring charges, asset write downs, losses from discontinued operations, restatements and accounting changes and other unplanned special charges such as restructuring expenses, acquisitions, acquisition or disposition expenses, including expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, stock offerings, stock repurchases and loan loss provisions; provided that in the case of an Award intended to qualify for the exemption from the limitation on deductibility imposed by Code Section 162(m), such inclusion or exclusion shall be made in compliance with Code Section 162(m).

(d)           If the Committee determines that a performance goal has been satisfied and the satisfaction of such goal was intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 162(m), the Committee shall certify that the goal has been satisfied in accordance with the requirements set forth under Code Section 162(m).

12.           Effect of a Change in Control. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary (with the exception of Sec. 6(h)), the provisions of this Section 12 shall apply in the case of a Change in Control of the Company, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Agreement and as supplemented by Section 14.

(a)           Awards Assumed or Substituted by Surviving Entity. With respect to Options and Awards assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection with a Change in Control: if within two years after the effective date of the Change in Control, a Grantee’s employment is terminated without Cause or the Grantee resigns for Good Reason, then (i) all of the Grantee’s outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested and exercisable and shall remain exercisable for three years following such termination, provided no Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable beyond the term of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right, (ii) all time-based vesting restrictions on his or her outstanding Awards shall lapse, and (iii) unless otherwise provided in the Agreement, the payout level under all of the Grantee’s performance-based that were outstanding immediately prior to effective time of the Change in Control shall be determined and deemed to have been earned as of the date of termination based upon an assumed achievement of all relevant performance goals at the target level, or at a level in excess of target in the Committee’s discretion, and there shall be a pro rata payout to such Grantee within sixty (60) days following the date of termination of employment based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the date of termination of employment. With regard to each Award or Option, a Grantee shall not be considered to have resigned for Good Reason unless either (i) the Agreement provides for a Good Reason termination or (ii) the Grantee is party to an employment, severance or similar agreement with the Company or a Subsidiary that includes provisions in which the Grantee is permitted to resign for Good Reason. To the extent that this provision causes Incentive Stock Options to no longer satisfy the requirements of Code Section 422, the affected Options shall be deemed to be Nonqualified Stock Options.

(b)           Awards not Assumed or Substituted by Surviving Entity. Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, and except with respect to any Options or Awards assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection with the Change in Control: (i) outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested and exercisable, (ii) time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding Awards shall lapse, and (iii) unless otherwise provided in the Agreement, the target payout opportunities attainable under outstanding performance-based Awards shall be deemed to have been earned as of the effective date of the Change in Control based upon an assumed achievement of all relevant performance goals at the target level, or at a level in excess of target in the Committee’s discretion, and there shall be a pro rata payout to Grantees within sixty (60) days following the Change in Control based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the Change in Control. To

52

the extent that this provision causes Incentive Stock Options to no longer satisfy the requirements of Code Section 422, the affected Options shall be deemed to be Nonqualified Stock Options.

(c)           Definitions.

(1)           A surviving entity will be deemed to have “assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted” an Award or Option under this Plan if the surviving entity substitutes an Award or Option under this Plan or an award or stock option under a plan of the surviving entity having equivalent value to and terms and conditions no less favorable than the original Award or Option, or otherwise assumes the obligations under and/or equitably adjusts such original Award or Option. The Committee or the Board shall have sole authority to determine whether the proposed assumption of an Award or Option by a surviving entity meets the requirements listed in this Section 12(c)(1).

(2)           “Good Reason” (or a similar term denoting constructive termination) has the meaning, if any, assigned such term in the employment, severance or similar agreement, if any, between a Grantee and the Company or a Subsidiary; provided, however, if there is no such employment, severance or similar agreement in which such term is defined, “Good Reason” shall have the meaning, if any, given such term in the applicable Agreement. If not defined in either such document, the term “Good Reason” as used herein shall not apply to a particular Award.

13.           Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization.

(a)           In the event of a Change in Capitalization, the Committee shall conclusively determine the appropriate adjustments, if any, to the maximum number and class of shares of stock with respect to which Options or Awards may be granted under the Plan, the number and class of shares as to which Options or Awards have been granted under the Plan, and the purchase price therefor, if applicable.

(b)           Any such adjustment in the Shares or other securities subject to outstanding Incentive Stock Options (including any adjustments in the purchase price) shall be made in such manner as not to constitute a modification as defined by Section 424(h)(3) of the Code and only to the extent otherwise permitted by Sections 422 and 424 of the Code.

(c)           If, by reason of a Change in Capitalization, a Grantee of an Award shall be entitled to new, additional or different shares of stock or securities, such new additional or different shares shall thereupon be subject to all of the conditions, restrictions and performance criteria which were applicable to the Shares or units pursuant to the Award prior to such Change in Capitalization.

14.           Effect of Certain Transactions. Upon the occurrence or in anticipation of any corporate event or transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, combination or exchange of shares, liquidation or dissolution, sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, or any Change in Capitalization), the Committee may, in its sole discretion, notwithstanding Section 12 hereunder, provide (i) that Options or Awards will be settled in cash rather than stock or in unrestricted shares of stock of the surviving entity, (ii) that Options or Awards will become immediately vested and non-forfeitable and exercisable (in whole or in part) and will be cancelled after a designated period of time to the extent not then exercised, (iii) that Options or Awards will be assumed by another party to a transaction or otherwise be equitably converted or substituted in connection with such transaction, (iv) that outstanding Options or Awards may be settled by payment in cash or cash equivalents equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying stock, as of a specified date associated with the transaction (or the per share transaction price), over the exercise or base price of the Option or Award and those Options or Awards not eligible for payment shall be cancelled, (v) that performance targets and performance periods for performance-based Awards and Options will be modified, consistent with Code Section 162(m) where applicable, or (vi) any combination of the foregoing. The Committee’s determination need not be uniform and may be different for different Grantees whether or not such Grantees are similarly situated.

15.           Termination and Amendment of the Plan. The Plan shall terminate on the day preceding the tenth anniversary of its effective date and no Option or Award may be granted thereafter. The Board may sooner terminate or amend the Plan at any time, and from time to time;provided, however, that, except as provided in Sections 13 and 14 hereof, no amendment shall be effective unless approved by the shareholders of the Company in accordance with applicable law and regulations at an annual or special meeting held within twelve months before or after the date of adoption of such amendment, where approval of such amendment is required under applicable laws, policies or regulations or applicable listing or other requirements of the national securities exchange upon which the Shares are then listed, including amendments that will:

(a)           increase the number of Shares as to which Options or Awards may be granted under the Plan;

(b)           change the class of persons eligible to participate in the Plan; or

(c)           materially extend the term of the Plan.

53

Except as otherwise provided herein, rights and obligations under any Option or Award granted before any amendment of the Plan shall not be altered or impaired by such amendment, except with the consent of the Grantee.

16.           Non-Exclusivity of the Plan. The adoption of the Plan by the Board shall not be construed as amending, modifying or rescinding any previously approved incentive arrangement or as creating any limitations on the power of the Board to adopt such other incentive arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of stock options otherwise than under the Plan, and such arrangements may be either applicable generally or only in specific cases.

17.           Limitation of Liability. As illustrative of the limitations of liability of the Company, but not intended to be exhaustive thereof, nothing in the Plan shall be construed to:

(a)           give any person any right to be granted an Option or Award other than at the sole discretion of the Committee or the Board;

(b)           give any person any rights whatsoever with respect to Shares except as specifically provided in the Plan;

(c)           limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate the employment or service of any person at any time; or

(d)           be evidence of any agreement or understanding, expressed or implied, that the Company will employ any person in any particular position at any particular rate of compensation or for any particular period of time.

18.           Regulations and Other Approvals; Governing Law.

(a)           This Plan and the rights of all persons claiming hereunder shall be construed and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey without giving effect to the choice of law principles thereof, except to the extent that such law is preempted by federal law.

(b)           The obligation of the Company to sell or deliver Shares with respect to Options and Awards granted under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including all applicable federal and state securities laws, and the obtaining of all such approvals by governmental agencies as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee.

(c)           The Plan is intended to comply with Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act and Section 162(m) of the Code (each as amended from time to time) and the Committee shall interpret and administer the provisions of the Plan or any Agreement in a manner consistent therewith to the extent necessary. Any provisions inconsistent with such Rule or Section shall be inoperative but shall not affect the validity of the Plan or any grants thereunder.

(d)           Except as otherwise provided in Section 15, the Board may make such changes as may be necessary or appropriate to comply with the rules and regulations of any government authority or to obtain for Eligible Employees granted Incentive Stock Options the tax benefits under the applicable provisions of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder.

(e)           Each Option and Award is subject to the requirement that, if at any time the Committee determines, in its absolute discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of Shares issuable pursuant to the Plan is required by any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or the consent or approval of any governmental regulatory body is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the grant of an Option or Award or the issuance of Shares, no Options or Awards shall be granted or payment made or Shares issued, in whole or in part, unless listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval has been effected or obtained free of any conditions unacceptable to the Committee.

(f)           In the event that the disposition of Shares acquired pursuant to the Plan is not covered by a then current registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is not otherwise exempt from such registration, such Shares shall be restricted against transfer to the extent required by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or regulations thereunder, and the Committee may require any individual receiving Shares pursuant to the Plan, as a condition precedent to receipt of such Shares (including upon exercise of an Option), to represent to the Company in writing that the Shares acquired by such individual are acquired for investment only and not with a view to distribution.

19.           Miscellaneous.

(a)           Multiple Agreements. The terms of each Option or Award may differ from other Options or Awards granted under the Plan at the same time, or at some other time. The Committee may also grant more than one Option or Award to a given Eligible Employee during the term of the Plan, either in addition to, or in substitution for, one or more Options or Awards previously granted to that Eligible Employee. The grant of multiple Options and/or Awards may be evidenced by a single Agreement or multiple Agreements, as determined by the Committee.

(b)           Withholding of Taxes. The Company shall have the right to deduct from any distribution of cash to any Grantee an amount equal to the federal, state and local income taxes and other amounts required by law to be withheld with respect to any Option or Award. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if a Grantee is entitled to receive Shares upon exercise of an Option or pursuant to an Award, the Company shall have the right to require such Grantee, prior to the delivery of such Shares, to pay to the Company

54

the amount of any federal, state or local income taxes and other amounts which the Company is required by law to withhold. A Grantee who is an Eligible Employee may be permitted, in the Committee’s discretion, to satisfy any amounts required to be withheld by the Company under applicable federal, state and local tax laws in effect from time to time, by electing to have the Company withhold a portion of the Shares to be delivered for the payment of such taxes. The Agreement evidencing any Incentive Stock Options granted under this Plan shall provide that if the Grantee makes a disposition, within the meaning of Section 424(c) of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder, of any Share or Shares issued to him or her pursuant to his or her exercise of the Incentive Stock Option within the two-year period commencing on the day after the date of grant of such Option or within the one-year period commencing on the day after the date of transfer of the Share or Shares to the Grantee pursuant to the exercise of such Option, he or she shall, within ten (10) days of such disposition, notify the Company thereof.

(c)           Designation of Beneficiary. Each Grantee may, with the consent of the Committee, designate a person or persons to receive in the event of his/her death, any Option or Award or any amount payable pursuant thereto, to which he/she would then be entitled. Such designation will be made upon forms supplied by and delivered to the Company and may be revoked in writing. If a Grantee fails effectively to designate a beneficiary, then his/her estate will be deemed to be the beneficiary.

(d)           Section 409A Compliance. The Plan is intended to be administered and interpreted in a manner consistent with the requirements, where applicable, of Section 409A of the Code. Where reasonably possible and practicable, the Plan shall be administered in a manner to avoid the imposition on Grantees in the Plan of immediate tax recognition and additional taxes pursuant to Section 409A. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company, the Board nor the Committee shall have any liability to any person in the event Section 409A applies to any such Award or Option in a manner that results in adverse tax consequences for the Grantee or any of his/her beneficiaries or transferees.

(e)           Recoupment. To the extent required by applicable law (including, without limitation, Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) and/or the rules and regulations of any securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation service on which the Shares are listed or quoted, or if so required pursuant to a written policy adopted by the Company, Options and Awards shall be subject (including on a retroactive basis) to clawback, forfeiture or similar requirements.

20.           Effective Date. The effective date of the Plan shall be the date of its adoption by the Board, subject only to the approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of shareholders at which a quorum is present to be held within twelve (12) months of such adoption. No Options or Awards shall vest hereunder unless such shareholder approval is obtained.

55

 

56

 

.. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on April 26, 2016. Vote by Internet • Go to www.envisionreports.com/PGC • Or scan the QR code with your smartphone • Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone • Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X Annual Meeting Proxy Card • IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • Proposals — The Board recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. 1. Election of Directors: For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold + 01 - Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr. 02 - Dr. Susan A. Cole 03 - Anthony J. Consi, II 04 - Richard Daingerfield 05 - Edward A. Gramigna, Jr. 06 - Douglas L. Kennedy 07 - F. Duffield Meyercord 08 - John D. Kissel 09 - James R. Lamb, Esq. 10 - Philip W. Smith, III 11 - Beth Welsh For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 2. To approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the 3. The approval of the amended Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s named executive officers as determined by the Corporation 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, which Compensation Committee. includes an increase in the share reserve by 500,000 shares and certain other amendments described herein. 4. The ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016. Note: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Meeting. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. 1UPX + 02B41A .. Directions to Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s Annual Meeting From points North: From points South: • Take I-287 South to exit 22 toward US 202/US 206 N • Take I-287 North to exit 22A US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Take jughandle on right • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Turn left on US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • + Proxy — Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New JerseyProxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting – April 26, 2016 John D. Kissel, James R. Lamb and Philip W. Smith, III or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation to be held on April 26, 2016 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.) Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print your new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. +

57

 


 

.. + Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation Shareholder Meeting to be Held on April 26, 2016May 9, 2018 Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, you are receiving this notice that the proxy materials for the annual shareholders’ meeting are available on the Internet. Follow the instructions below to view the materials and vote online or request a copy. The items to be voted on and location of the annual meeting are on the reverse side. Your vote is important! This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. The proxy statement and annual report on Form 10-K are available at: www.envisionreports.com/PGC • Easy Online Access — A Convenient Way to View Proxy Materials and Vote When you go online to view materials, you can also vote your shares. Step 1: Go to www.envisionreports.com/PGC to view the materials. Step 2: Click on Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. Step 3: Follow the instructions on the screen to log in. Step 4: Make your selection as instructed on each screen to select delivery preferences and vote. When you go online, you can also help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery of future materials. Obtaining a Copy of the Proxy Materials – If you want to receive a copy of these documents, you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a copy. Please make your request for a copy as instructed on the reverse side on or before April 12, 201625, 2018 to facilitate timely delivery. 2NOT + 02B43A 02SQ0B

.. Shareholder Meeting Notice Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Tuesday, April 26, 2016Wednesday, May 9, 2018 onthe first floor of the headquarters building at 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New Jersey, at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m. Eastern Time. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3, and 4: 1. Election of Directors. 2. Advisory vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive compensation.officers. 3. Amended 2012 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.Amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 21,000,000 to 42,000,000. 4. Ratify selectionthe appointment of auditors.Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. PLEASE NOTE – YOU CANNOT VOTE BY RETURNING THIS NOTICE. To vote your shares you must vote online or request a paper copy of the proxy materials to receive a proxy card. If you wish to attend and vote at the meeting, please bring this notice with you. Directions to Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s Annual Meeting From points North: From points South: • Take I-287 South to exit 22 toward US 202/US 206 N • Take I-287 North to exit 22A US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Take jughandle on right • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Turn left on US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left Here’s how to order a copy of the proxy materials and select a future delivery preference: Paper copies: Current and future paper delivery requests can be submitted via the telephone, Internet or email options below. Email copies: Current and future email delivery requests must be submitted via the Internet following the instructions below. If you request an email copy of current materials you will receive an email with a link to the materials. PLEASE NOTE: You must use the number in the shaded bar on the reverse side when requesting a set of proxy materials. • Internet – Go to www.envisionreports.com/PGC. Click Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. Follow the instructions to log in and order a copy of the current meeting materials and submit your preference for email or paper delivery of future meeting materials. • Telephone – Call us free of charge at 1-866-641-4276 and follow the instructions to log in and order a paper copy of the materials by mail for the current meeting. You can also submit a preference to receive a paper copy for future meetings. • Email – Send email to investorvote@computershare.com with “Proxy Materials Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation” in the subject line. Include in the message your full name and address, plus the number located in the shaded bar on the reverse, and state in the email that you want a paper copy of current meeting materials. You can also state your preference to receive a paper copy for future meetings. To facilitate timely delivery, all requests for a paper copy of the proxy materials must be received by April 25, 2018. 02SQ0B

.. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern time, on May 9, 2018. Vote by Internet • Go to www.envisionreports.com/PGC • Or scan the QR code with your smartphone • Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone • Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X Annual Meeting Proxy Card • IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • Proposals — The Board recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. 1. Election of Directors to serve for a one-year term and until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold + 01 - Carmen M. Bowser 02 - Dr. Susan A. Cole 03 - Anthony J. Consi 04 - Richard Daingerfield 05 - Edward A. Gramigna, Jr. 06 - Steven A. Kass 07 - Douglas L. Kennedy 08 - John D. Kissel 09 - James R. Lamb, Esq. 10 - F. Duffield Meyercord 11 - Philip W. Smith, III 12 2016. 02B43A- Tony Spinelli 13 - Beth Welsh For Against Abstain 2. Advisory vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the 3. Amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 21,000,000 to 42,000,000. Against Abstain For 4. Ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. Note: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Meeting. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. 1UPX + 02SPYB

59

.. Directions to Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s Annual Meeting From points North: From points South: • Take I-287 South to exit 22 toward US 202/US 206 N • Take I-287 North to exit 22A US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Take jughandle on right • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Turn left on US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • + Proxy — Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New JerseyProxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting – May 9, 2018 John D. Kissel, James R. Lamb and Philip W. Smith, III or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation to be held on May 9, 2018 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3, and 4. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.) Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print your new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. +